For too many fact to squeeze in. Do yourself a favor and read this:
In a February 22, 2013 hearing, O’Mara petitioned the court to order a deposition of Crump. O’Mara sought to discover, among other information, why there were multiple interruptions in the audiotaped interview Crump conducted of Dee Dee on March 19, 2012. That interview, and Crump’s subsequent, hyperbolic statements regarding its content, were instrumental in securing Zimmerman’s eventual arrest. Crump resisted that deposition, filing a sworn affidavit with the court in which he claimed that any interruptions were entirely innocent and no matters of substance were discussed while the recorder was off.
Apparently partially based on a non-skeptical reading of Crump’s deposition, on March 4, Judge Debra Nelson denied O’Mara’s motion to depose Crump, primarily citing the work product privilege (opposing attorneys are generally not required to submit to depositions, but this privilege is not absolute). And this is where matters have suddenly become very, very interesting, and may, once again, blow up in the prosecution’s face just as Vesuvius blew up on Pompeii and Herculaneum in 79 AD. And once again, Dee Dee–the gift to the defense that just keeps on giving–is involved.
http://statelymcdanielmanor.wordpress.com/2013/03/22/the-trayvon-martin-case-update-23-2013-ad-mt-deedee-erupts/The little tyrants will be furious.
