« previous next »
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: Poll:Should DUmmies names be on a national registry to prevent them owning a gun  (Read 1142 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline thundley4

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 40571
  • Reputation: +2224/-127
Poll:Should DUmmies names be on a national registry to prevent them owning a gun
« on: December 17, 2012, 12:55:24 PM »
Quote
snooper2 (14,905 posts)

I would support a national registry for all mental health patients

A persons name would be in the national registry if a licensed psychiatrist deemed that person unfit to own a firearm...

There would be an appeals process for people on the national list banning them from purchasing a firearm.

16 votes, 3 passes | Time left: Unlimited
   support national registry
0 (0%)
   don't support national registry
16 (100%)
   3 DU members did not wish to select any of the options provided.
Show usernames Disclaimer: This is an Internet poll
  http://www.democraticunderground.com/10022011479

Quote
obamanut2012 (8,082 posts)
6. An absolutely terrible idea

It literally gave me flashes of the Third Reich, as well as people put on the registry for things like being gay and black.

You do realize that sociopaths aren't mentally ill, and wouldn't be on that registry? Right?

Hitler outlawed guns.  What is it that DUmmies want to do again?

Logged

Offline dutch508

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12577
  • Reputation: +1731/-1068
  • Remember
Re: Poll:Should DUmmies names be on a national registry to prevent them owning a gun
« Reply #1 on: December 17, 2012, 01:02:43 PM »
Quote from: thundley4 on December 17, 2012, 12:55:24 PM
  http://www.democraticunderground.com/10022011479

Hitler outlawed guns.  What is it that DUmmies want to do again?



He outlawed gun and killed all the mentally insane. What's a DUmmie to do?
Logged
The torch of moral clarity since 12/18/07

2016 DOTY: 06 Omaha Steve - Is dying for ****'s face! How could you not vote for him, you heartless bastards!?!

Offline EagleKeeper

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2585
  • Reputation: +134/-100
  • ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ
Re: Poll:Should DUmmies names be on a national registry to prevent them owning a gun
« Reply #2 on: December 17, 2012, 01:05:16 PM »
I read something on the interwebs a while back.

Had something to do about courage of your convictions or some such, or maybe it mentioned something about asylums for thee but not for me.

I don't know, maybe I'm wrong about that.
Logged
Never interrupt your enemy when he is making a mistake.
- Napoleon Bonaparte

If you wait by the river long enough the bodies of your enemies will float by.
-Sun Tzu

Offline EagleKeeper

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2585
  • Reputation: +134/-100
  • ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ
Re: Poll:Should DUmmies names be on a national registry to prevent them owning a gun
« Reply #3 on: December 17, 2012, 01:20:58 PM »
This reply is in the campfire, I thought it was interesting so I towed it over.

Quote
TwilightGardener (37,170 posts)
12. Asinine. Instead I support a national registry for all gun owners.

Last edited Mon Dec 17, 2012, 01:58 PM USA/ET - Edit history (1)

With a licensed psychiatrist evaluating the circumstances and background of each and every person who wants to own a gun. And a mandated inventory of each gun owned. And a new eval, or an update of the previous eval, for each gun purchased. Edit to add: All costs to be borne by the person who wishes to be licensed and registered to own the firearm.


Don't look at me, I don't have a problem...
Logged
Never interrupt your enemy when he is making a mistake.
- Napoleon Bonaparte

If you wait by the river long enough the bodies of your enemies will float by.
-Sun Tzu

Online DefiantSix

  • Captain, IKS Defiant
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 18668
  • Reputation: +1993/-189
  • "Set Condition One throughout the ship."
Re: Poll:Should DUmmies names be on a national registry to prevent them owning a gun
« Reply #4 on: December 17, 2012, 01:21:46 PM »
Quote
snooper2 (14,905 posts)

I would support a national registry for all mental health patients

A persons name would be in the national registry if a licensed psychiatrist deemed that person unfit to own a firearm...

There would be an appeals process for people on the national list banning them from purchasing a firearm.

16 votes, 3 passes | Time left: Unlimited
   support national registry
0 (0%)
   don't support national registry
16 (100%)
   3 DU members did not wish to select any of the options provided.
Show usernames Disclaimer: This is an Internet poll

Got news for you DUmbshit: it already exists.  Question #11f on BATF Form 4473 asks:
Quote
"Have you ever been adjudicated mentally defective (which includes a determination by a court, board, commission or other lawful authority that you are a danger to yourself or to others or that you are incompetent to manage your own affairs) OR have you ever been committed to a mental institution?"

IN other words, if at any time in your life, a court has been asked to declare you, well, the typical DUmmy, you are forevermore banned from so much as simple possession of a firearm of any kind.  Oh, and the records of such adjudications are available to the NICS system: if the background check turns even one up, DING! no gun for you.  (By the way: this is why the Dear Leader Regime is going gangbusters on their efforts to get Desert Storm/OEF/OIF vets to come forward for "treatment" of their PTSD.  It counts as an adjudication of mentally defective, according to them.)

So, DUmmy, knowing that your grand idea has been in place for at least 25 years, how'd that work out in Connecticut last week?
Logged
"Stand your ground. Don't fire unless fired upon, but if they mean to have a war, let it begin here."
-- Capt. John Parker
"I'm not looking for forgiveness, and I'm way past asking permission"
-- Capt. Steve Rogers
"In this present crisis, government is not the solution to our problem, government IS the problem."
-- Ronaldus Magnus

Offline Airwolf

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12160
  • Reputation: +912/-163
Re: Poll:Should DUmmies names be on a national registry to prevent them owning a gun
« Reply #5 on: December 17, 2012, 01:32:52 PM »
You can hear the goostepping all they way acroos the internet with each keystroke they make. Next thing you know their Dear leader will be asking them to make up his new citizen corp or whatever it was he was asking for so they can come to get us and our guns.
Logged
MOLON LABE

"Someday, when all your civilization and science are likewise swept away, your kind will pray for a man with a sword."-- Conan the Barbarian

Clint Eastwood - Because God wanted Chuck Norris to have nightmares.

"I am not a Number,I am a free man"

"He's my hero, you don't put away your heros, you honor them!"

Offline DumbAss Tanker

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 28493
  • Reputation: +1710/-151
Re: Poll:Should DUmmies names be on a national registry to prevent them owning a gun
« Reply #6 on: December 17, 2012, 03:35:51 PM »
If we're going to have national ID check that includes a database on people with restraining orders and convictions because those disqualify a purchaser, then yes, we probably should have one for diagnosed mental pathologies too.  It wouldn't have changed a damned thing in CT, of course, since Lanza did not buy or register to himself the firearms he used.
Logged
Go and tell the Spartans, O traveler passing by
That here, obedient to their law, we lie.

Anything worth shooting once is worth shooting at least twice.

Offline jukin

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 16232
  • Reputation: +2115/-170
Re: Poll:Should DUmmies names be on a national registry to prevent them owning a gun
« Reply #7 on: December 17, 2012, 04:14:19 PM »
Not just yes but HELL YES! Most of the DUmp readily admits that they are mentally ill, on drugs, or both.
Logged
When you are the beneficiary of someone’s kindness and generosity, it produces a sense of gratitude and community.

When you are the beneficiary of a policy that steals from someone and gives it to you in return for your vote, it produces a sense of entitlement and dependency.
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »