And he could have explained to Specter that Rich’s deals in Iran and Iraq were often related to his other role — as an asset of the Mossad who gathered intelligence and helped to rescue endangered Jews from those regimes.
The Marc Rich pardon was awful, because he was still a fugitive, so even if for some reason he merited one, he needed to turn himself in first, then be pardoned. Farcenter is quoting Joe Conason:
http://www.salon.com/2009/01/16/holder_4/If you accept their premise for why Rich was pardoned, isn't it interesting what these people consider a
bad reason to pardon him?--connections that could help free Israelis being held captured in Iran and (at the time) Iraq. With extra evil sauce on top because it's the
Israeli lobby. As if people usually receive Presidential pardons without external advocacy of some kind.
On August 11, 1999, Clinton commuted the sentences of 16 members of FALN, a violent Puerto Rican terrorist group that set off 120 bombs in the United States, mostly in New York City and Chicago. There were convictions for conspiracy to commit robbery, bomb-making, and sedition, as well as firearms and explosives violations.[3] The 16 were convicted of conspiracy and sedition and sentenced with terms ranging from 35 to 105 years in prison. Congress, however, recognizes that the FALN is responsible for "6 deaths and the permanent maiming of dozens of others, including law enforcement officials." Clinton offered clemency, on condition that the prisoners renounce violence seeing as none of the 16 had been convicted of harming anyone and they had already served 19 years in prison. This action was lobbied by ten Nobel Laureates, the Archbishop of Puerto Rico and the Cardinal of New York. [4] The commutation was opposed by U.S. Attorney's Office, the FBI, and the Federal Bureau of Prisons and criticized by many including former victims of FALN terrorist activities and the Fraternal Order of Police.[5] Hillary Clinton, then campaigning for her first term in the Senate, initially supported the commutation,[6] but later withdrew her support.[7]
Congress condemned this action by President Clinton, with votes of 95-2 in the Senate and 311-41 in the House.[8][9] The U.S. House Committee on Government Reform held an investigation on the matter, but the Justice Department prevented FBI officials from testifying.[10] President Clinton cited executive privilege for his refusal to turn over some documents to Congress related to his decision to offer clemency to members of the FALN terrorist group.
Of course HC withdrew her support after she saw this as too damaging to her election in NYS, but she, and especially she, had to have really set those wheels in motion. It doesn't take Einstein to figure out who really was instrumental in getting the pardon for them, though.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bill_Clinton_pardon_controversyI did some digging and this was just fine by the DUmmies until it was Obama v Hillary in 2008, then they threw her under the bus on this one to supposedly balance out Obama's Ayers connection.
