Author Topic: More panic setting in  (Read 5385 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Ballygrl

  • Lipstick Renegade
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 14934
  • Reputation: +983/-120
Re: More panic setting in
« Reply #25 on: March 30, 2012, 01:22:55 PM »
I know this is a DUmp thread. But I have a semi-serious question.

Do the liberal thinkers really believe that conservatives are as stupid as some portray us on the MSM? Matthews was absolutely shocked when conservatives put up a well-reasoned defense of the overturning of Obamacare. The SG was shockingly unprepared for the reasoned attacks put up against the constitutionality of the individual mandate, after 2 full years to prepare.

I'm not talking DUmmies here, or the assholes on MSNBC or the idiots leading the charge against Zimmerman in Florida. Does the majority of the left actually buy into the idea that those on the right are not as intelligent?

The left are a bunch of overhyped know nothings who do not have an expansive view of the world.  They're in a prison that's created by their own conceit.  They're in a prison that's the result of their own arrogance and they live in a place where there is no reality. Rush Limbaugh
Quote
"The nation that couldn’t be conquered by foreign enemies has been conquered by its elected officials" odawg Free Republic in reference to the GOP Elites who are no difference than the Democrats

Offline Karin

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17752
  • Reputation: +1895/-81
Re: More panic setting in
« Reply #26 on: March 30, 2012, 01:41:37 PM »
From the link that BEG put up; that Tom Paine commenter sounds just like a DUmmie.  He'd be so at-home there. 

Offline Karin

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17752
  • Reputation: +1895/-81
Re: More panic setting in
« Reply #27 on: March 30, 2012, 02:24:04 PM »
I re-sorted the comments for newest first.  902 of them.  They are fantastic.  I like this one:

Quote

 Walljasper   9 minutes ago   2 Likes
Politicaly INFECTED? With what?  A vestigial memory that we are a free people with inalienable rights?  That these corrupt politicians and their supporting army of attorneys and toadies are an assault on our rights and freedoms?

Then I welcome that very type of infection.


Bob Shrum is being skinned alive over there...

Offline BEG

  • "Mile Marker"
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17277
  • Reputation: +1062/-301
Re: More panic setting in
« Reply #28 on: March 30, 2012, 03:00:34 PM »
This has something to do with the Shrum link I posted above. Today I heard Rush talking about what Kagan said during the deliberations earlier this week.  

And the left wonder why we keep winning.

Quote
KAGAN: Why is a big gift from the federal government a matter of coercion? In other words, the federal government is here saying: We're giving you a boatload of money. There are no matching funds requirement. There are no extraneous conditions attached to it. It's just a boatload of federal money for you to take and spend on poor people's health care. It doesn't sound coercive to me, I have to tell you.

Quote
RUSH: I am sitting here, if you're not watching on Dittocam you can't see me with my mouth all the way open, in stunned disbelief. Folks, this is why all week I have been urging you: Don't think they're smarter than you are. Don't fall for that. Don't grant them that. These are some of the most uninformed, ill-informed, arrogant, conceited people you will ever encounter. I'm not even gonna assume she knows what she's talking about. What it could be is that the federal government is passing the burden of Medicaid to the states. In Obamacare they are off-loading some of the costs to the states. They're demanding that states pick up Medicaid costs, and she is of the belief that the states are gonna get the money that the federal government currently spends on Medicaid, but they aren't. The states aren't going to be able to afford this. And unlike the federal government, they can't go print money.

Offline Ballygrl

  • Lipstick Renegade
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 14934
  • Reputation: +983/-120
Re: More panic setting in
« Reply #29 on: March 30, 2012, 03:24:28 PM »
Kagan actually said that? WOW!
Quote
"The nation that couldn’t be conquered by foreign enemies has been conquered by its elected officials" odawg Free Republic in reference to the GOP Elites who are no difference than the Democrats

Offline BEG

  • "Mile Marker"
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17277
  • Reputation: +1062/-301
Re: More panic setting in
« Reply #30 on: March 30, 2012, 03:28:01 PM »

Offline Duke Nukum

  • Assistant Chair of the Committee on Neighborhood Services
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8015
  • Reputation: +561/-202
  • O frabjous day! Callooh! Callay!'
Re: More panic setting in
« Reply #31 on: March 30, 2012, 07:58:35 PM »
.



There is going to be violence when Obama loses, mark my words. They are waiting for an excuse.
I'm skeptical. I don't doubt it could happen, but even with top-down encouragement from the likes of Van Jones, violence has been relatively limited. Lots of disgusting stuff and OWS on OWS crime and some isolated attacks but I don't know that the OWS/DUmmie types have the courage to start an all-out civil war. Their plan seems to be to provoke us into violence. Shame us. And thus win public opinion, and with that the election.

If Scott Walker wins his recall election, that could be the bellwether for an 0bama loss.

If Wisconsin can hold the line against the moonbats and flip to "R" in the Presidential election for the first time since 1984, I think, that is all-she-wrote for a second 0bama term.
“A man who has been through bitter experiences and travelled far enjoys even his sufferings after a time”
― Homer, The Odyssey

Offline BEG

  • "Mile Marker"
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17277
  • Reputation: +1062/-301
Re: More panic setting in
« Reply #32 on: March 30, 2012, 08:02:40 PM »
I'm skeptical. I don't doubt it could happen, but even with top-down encouragement from the likes of Van Jones, violence has been relatively limited. Lots of disgusting stuff and OWS on OWS crime and some isolated attacks but I don't know that the OWS/DUmmie types have the courage to start an all-out civil war. Their plan seems to be to provoke us into violence. Shame us. And thus win public opinion, and with that the election.

If Scott Walker wins his recall election, that could be the bellwether for an 0bama loss.

If Wisconsin can hold the line against the moonbats and flip to "R" in the Presidential election for the first time since 1984, I think, that is all-she-wrote for a second 0bama term.

Wanna make a bet?  We can bet dinner or something.  :-)

Offline Duke Nukum

  • Assistant Chair of the Committee on Neighborhood Services
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8015
  • Reputation: +561/-202
  • O frabjous day! Callooh! Callay!'
Re: More panic setting in
« Reply #33 on: March 30, 2012, 10:05:53 PM »
Wanna make a bet?  We can bet dinner or something.  :-)
If either of us are alive after the apocalypse, sure.
“A man who has been through bitter experiences and travelled far enjoys even his sufferings after a time”
― Homer, The Odyssey

Offline BEG

  • "Mile Marker"
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17277
  • Reputation: +1062/-301
Re: More panic setting in
« Reply #34 on: March 30, 2012, 10:27:17 PM »
If either of us are alive after the apocalypse, sure.

Oh it's on, like Donkey Kong.   :p

Offline GOBUCKS

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 24186
  • Reputation: +1812/-339
  • All in all, not bad, not bad at all
Re: More panic setting in
« Reply #35 on: March 31, 2012, 12:12:43 AM »
There is going to be violence when Obama loses, mark my words. They are waiting for an excuse.
If he loses (a big IF, I'm afraid), there will be no widespread violence.

You may have a few pockets of 0bamaites setting fire to their own neighborhood, as they are wont to do from time to time, but nothing hazardous to normal people.

The rioters are always looking only for the chance to loot a Best Buy for iPads and widescreens.

The fact is, the vast, vast majority of Americans are either happy with their lives and their country, or are not inclined to become criminals.

The handful of ghetto rats who look for an excuse to score widescreens will be easily crushed by normal law enforcement.

The DUmp's keyboard commandos will never be more than just that.

Offline docstew

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4741
  • Reputation: +282/-187
  • My Wife is awesome!
Re: More panic setting in
« Reply #36 on: March 31, 2012, 01:05:21 AM »
Kagan actually said that? WOW!

How about this for 3 dimensional Chess DUmmies?

1) Kagan enters her vote for full Constitutional status for obamacare like a good socialist.
2) In January, the new supermajority (of both houses) Republican HOR impeaches her for violation of federal law (specifically, the one that would require her to recuse herself from this case) and the supermajority Republican Senate convicts, removing her from the USSC.
3) By February 1, 2013, President Romney (or Santorum, or Gingrich) nominates a younger version of Robert Bork to the USSC to replace not only Kennedy (who is widely expected to retire) but also Kagan, guaranteeing a constructionalist majority on the court for decades to come.

Check and Mate you DUmb bitches.

Offline whiffleball

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2161
  • Reputation: +95/-21
Re: More panic setting in
« Reply #37 on: March 31, 2012, 04:43:32 AM »
.



There is going to be violence when Obama loses, mark my words. They are waiting for an excuse.

With all the egging on by professional race baiters I don't see how it can be avoided.  I have to admit that I'm worried for my daughter and her family who live in a city.  I'm pretty safe where I am, but she might not be.  The next time I visit I'm taking her to the range for lessons.  Then I'm talking her into buying a gun instead of the motorcycle she wants so much.

Offline diesel driver

  • Creepy Ass Cracker and Smart-Ass White Boy!
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9130
  • Reputation: +609/-55
  • Enhancing My Carbon Footprint!
Re: More panic setting in
« Reply #38 on: March 31, 2012, 05:20:01 AM »
With all the egging on by professional race baiters I don't see how it can be avoided.  I have to admit that I'm worried for my daughter and her family who live in a city.  I'm pretty safe where I am, but she might not be.  The next time I visit I'm taking her to the range for lessons.  Then I'm talking her into buying a gun instead of the motorcycle she wants so much.

Tell her that unless and until she buys a gun AND ammo (kids like to work the "fringes" like that), and becomes proficient in its use, she can kiss the Kawasaki goodbye.

Government may not be able (for now) to tell us what to buy or not buy, but PARENTS have that power, in spades!   :-)

http://www.electstevedawes.com/
« Last Edit: March 31, 2012, 05:23:10 AM by diesel driver »
Murphy's 3rd Law:  "You can't make anything 'idiot DUmmie proof'.  The world will just create a better idiot DUmmie."

Liberals are like Slinkys.  Basically useless, but they do bring a smile to your face when you push them down a flight of stairs...
 
Global warming supporters believe that a few hundred million tons of CO2 has more control over our climate than a million mile in diameter, unshielded thermo-nuclear fusion reactor at the middle of the solar system.

"A dead enemy is a peaceful enemy.  Blessed be the peacemakers". - U.S. Marine Corp

You can't fix stupid, but you can vote it out of office.

Offline BlueStateSaint

  • Here I come to save the day, because I'm a
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 32553
  • Reputation: +1560/-191
  • RIP FDNY Lt. Rich Nappi d. 4/16/12
Re: More panic setting in
« Reply #39 on: March 31, 2012, 06:54:52 AM »
How about this for 3 dimensional Chess DUmmies?

1) Kagan enters her vote for full Constitutional status for obamacare like a good socialist.
2) In January, the new supermajority (of both houses) Republican HOR impeaches her for violation of federal law (specifically, the one that would require her to recuse herself from this case) and the supermajority Republican Senate convicts, removing her from the USSC.
3) By February 1, 2013, President Romney (or Santorum, or Gingrich) nominates a younger version of Robert Bork to the USSC to replace not only Kennedy (who is widely expected to retire) but also Kagan, guaranteeing a constructionalist majority on the court for decades to come.

Check and Mate you DUmb bitches.

Exactly.  Especially if the replacement for Kagan is this judge (on the DC Circuit Court of Appeals):



The sound of lefty heads exploding would be a wonderful thing to behold! :yahoo: :yahoo: :yahoo:

ETA:  Forgot again!  I wonder what the above Federal judge would think of the information on http://www.electstevedawes.com and said info's relevance to today's events . . .
« Last Edit: March 31, 2012, 06:59:10 AM by BlueStateSaint »
"Timid men prefer the calm of despotism to the tempestuous sea of Liberty." - Thomas Jefferson

"All you have to do is look straight and see the road, and when you see it, don't sit looking at it - walk!" -Ayn Rand
 
"Those that trust God with their safety must yet use proper means for their safety, otherwise they tempt Him, and do not trust Him.  God will provide, but so must we also." - Matthew Henry, Commentary on 2 Chronicles 32, from Matthew Henry's Commentary on the Whole Bible

"These anti-gun fools are more dangerous to liberty than street criminals or foreign spies."--Theodore Haas, Dachau Survivor

Chase her.
Chase her even when she's yours.
That's the only way you'll be assured to never lose her.

Offline Gina

  • Tinker Twat
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13088
  • Reputation: +830/-102
  • Short Bus bound!
Re: More panic setting in
« Reply #40 on: April 02, 2012, 07:36:07 AM »
Quote
RUSH: I am sitting here, if you're not watching on Dittocam you can't see me with my mouth all the way open, in stunned disbelief. Folks, this is why all week I have been urging you: Don't think they're smarter than you are. Don't fall for that. Don't grant them that. These are some of the most uninformed, ill-informed, arrogant, conceited people you will ever encounter. I'm not even gonna assume she knows what she's talking about. What it could be is that the federal government is passing the burden of Medicaid to the states. In Obamacare they are off-loading some of the costs to the states. They're demanding that states pick up Medicaid costs, and she is of the belief that the states are gonna get the money that the federal government currently spends on Medicaid, but they aren't. The states aren't going to be able to afford this. And unlike the federal government, they can't go print money.

I love him. I wanted to name my last son after him but hubby was a no go  :bawl:

I would marry him in a hot minute  :naughty:






"An army of deer led by a lion is more to be feared than an army of lions led by a deer." Phillip of Macedonia, father to Alexander.