Author Topic: Taverner primitive whines about being censored  (Read 1239 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline franksolich

  • Scourge of the Primitives
  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 58722
  • Reputation: +3102/-173
Taverner primitive whines about being censored
« on: March 07, 2012, 12:52:35 PM »
http://www.democraticunderground.com/124058634

Oh my.

Quote
Taverner (48,180 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore

Is this where I appeal a post being hidden?

Especially when I think that post was hidden on personal grounds, not because of any content?

Now, who would possibly have anything personal against the Taverner primitive?

Quote
maddezmom (125,924 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore

1. if it was hidden it was done by a jury, so there is no appeal process

Quote
Taverner (48,180 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore

2. Oh well, that sucks

Clearly some bugs need to be worked out

By that logic someone could be ganged up on by a group of malicious minded folks....

I think the Taverner primitive's being paranoid.

Drugs do that to one.

Quote
William769 (22,474 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore

4. Thats been tried and failed.

I'm proof positive of that.

Bwwwwaaaa-bwaaaaaa-bwwwaaa.

One of the professional gays.

Quote
SidDithers (19,807 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore

3. Link to the post, and post the jury result...

then we can all either sympathize with you on a bad jury decision, or chuckle if we agree with the jury

Quote
cynatnite (23,946 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore

5. The jury got it right...

http://www.democraticunderground.com/1002396326

REASON FOR ALERT:

This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate. (See <a href="http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=aboutus#communitystandards" target="_blank">Community Standards[/url].)

YOUR COMMENTS:

Shock content.

A randomly-selected Jury of DU members completed their review of this alert at Wed Mar 7, 2012, 01:16 PM, and voted 5-1 to HIDE IT.

Juror #1 voted to HIDE IT and said: No explanation given

Juror #2 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE and said: Nothing wrong with making a point bluntly, whether right or wrong.

Juror #3 voted to HIDE IT and said: Childish, and lacking any adult-level logic.

Juror #4 voted to HIDE IT and said: I didn't think the post was in any way constructive, just intended to be shocking.

Juror #5 voted to HIDE IT and said: You know, I might have voted to let it stand if it just had the whore comments, but the blow job comment is just too far, imo. Plus, this member has a history of posting outrageous things just for the attention and I think he should stop.

Juror #6 voted to HIDE IT and said: Taverner's biggest problem is that he doesn't know when to shut the **** up. This is one of those times where he should have just stepped away from the bong, but instead, he posted this crap. No, Taverner, I'm not a whore. You can call yourself one, but leave me the **** out. Hide this nonsense.

Quote
SidDithers (19,807 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore

7. Oh my...

Juror #6.

The Broderick primitive, to whom the old dude, Stinky the Clown, was excessively and unnecessarily rude a few weeks ago, when he inquired of the old dude's socio-economic status:

Quote
Broderick (3,437 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore

8. Those are some pretty personal jury comments in my opinion

I might have left it. Kind of fenced on it. I get the point, but it was crude.

Quote
trumad (30,311 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore

9. Hey Juror number 5...

You have a history of being a douche...

Juror number 6--- How is that Crack habit?

See how that works?

Anonymous cowards.

Quote
Taverner (48,180 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore

11. Hey man, thanks for helping me update my Jury Blacklist

Cheers!

Quote
cynatnite (23,946 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore

13. That's okay...

People have the right to alert on something they find not just offensive, but also just for the pure shock value. It was not personal at all. You have every right to alert on something of mine you believe violates TOS as well.

Quote
FSogol (11,539 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore

10. Maybe people just don't like being called whores?

Quote
Ruby the Liberal (13,806 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore

12. Never heard of an honest day's work?

Look, I lean socialist, but even this is over the top of the Marxism scale to me, and even then, Marx never said people shouldn't work and contribute to society.

I am surprised this wasn't a 6-0.
apres moi, le deluge

Milo Yiannopoulos "It has been obvious since 2016 that Trump carries an anointing of some kind. My American friends, are you so blind to reason, and deaf to Heaven? Can he do all this, and cannot get a crown? This man is your King. Coronate him, and watch every devil shriek, and every demon howl."

Offline GOBUCKS

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 24186
  • Reputation: +1812/-339
  • All in all, not bad, not bad at all
Re: Taverner primitive whines about being censored
« Reply #1 on: March 07, 2012, 01:34:21 PM »
Quote
Juror #3 voted to HIDE IT and said: Childish, and lacking any adult-level logic.

If applied consistently, this criterion would destroy the DUmp.


Offline Karin

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17752
  • Reputation: +1895/-81
Re: Taverner primitive whines about being censored
« Reply #2 on: March 07, 2012, 03:09:15 PM »
So I guess Taverner was saying that if you work, you're a whore. 

Their system is silly.  By other people's comments, you can piece together exactly what was said.  Why go through all this time-consuming drama? 

Offline GOBUCKS

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 24186
  • Reputation: +1812/-339
  • All in all, not bad, not bad at all
Re: Taverner primitive whines about being censored
« Reply #3 on: March 07, 2012, 04:16:45 PM »
So I guess Taverner was saying that if you work, you're a whore. 
The purpose of the OP, then, must be for the junkie to brag about his purity.