Honeycombe8 (1000+ posts) Mon Jul-04-11 02:28 PM
Original message
Check it out! Alberston's has done away with self-serve checkouts
What does that mean? That means their experiment with replacing people with machines @ self-serve checkouts was a bust.
I just got home from Albertson's. When going to check out, I saw that the self-serve stations were gone. So I went thru the express lane & asked the young man checking me out....so they've removed all the self-serves? Yeah, he says to me. Turns out that they were super expensive to buy and maintain. They were always needing repairs and maintenance, and he'd heard that once the part for repair cost $1,000, and another time it was several thousand dollars...and the machine cost thousands of dollars to begin with. Wow! I had no idea they were that expensive.
I must say that I'm glad the experiment failed, and that it turns out for Albertson's to be more cost effective to have human beings back in the store for checkout and customer service. More jobs for part-time college students and retirees, more full time jobs for cashiers. Yay!
I hope this is a sign of things to come.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=439x1413131First, this is nothing more than obedient parrots squawking along after the president yammered about ATMs.
But more importantly, what has happened is: the skilled service technician earning north of $15/hour has been replaced by unskilled cashiers. This has added to unemployment and depressed wages for those remaining as well as disincentivized the cashier to become skilled. Why invest in skills if those skills are replaced on the cheap by your already unskilled--for free--ass?
Oh and BTW: no incentive for skills = no need for teachers
See how humans are inter-connected by the desire for wealth!
Then there are the customers who must now wait longer thus losing productivity, personal maintenance and recreational time.
peace4ever (313 posts) Mon Jul-04-11 02:37 PM
Response to Original message
6. it's cheaper to have humans, hmmm... sounds a little depressing to me
don't get me wrong, I am all for folks having more jobs... I just wished we could get much better pay for being human, and providing our labor to the rich.
Feel free to give your time to people with no money just don't bitch about the natural consequences.
Honeycombe8 (1000+ posts) Tue Jul-05-11 01:37 PM
Response to Reply #18
95. I usu. use self-checkout machines. But I'm glad to see more people will get their jobs back...
It's a small thing, but important to those few people. and it helps the local economy.
That Alb. had several self-checkout machines, and always at least one was inoperable at any given time. They were always malfunctioning.
This idiot must think machines are self-creating, self-servicing beings.
If a conservative wants to keep out ilegals that depress wages with their under-the-table, unskilled wages they're evil.
If liberals want to destroy skilled technical labor with unskilled minimum wage positions it's holier-than-thou.
Citizen Worker (1000+ posts) Mon Jul-04-11 03:23 PM
Response to Original message
20. When the self check out machines appeared at my local grocery I vowed I would never go through them.
Now there is a management type who redirects customers to the automated money snatchers. When she approached me a couple of months ago to use the machine I loudly said, "no thanks, I'm going through the Union check out line." Now when she sees me she looks away.
"Money snatchers"?
Paying for the goods and services someone else produced and you consume is having your money snatched?
WTF are a rich man's taxes to prop-up welfare then?
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=439x1413131#1413237And it goes on like that.