Author Topic: Bradley v Prosser: the Brawl to End Them All  (Read 1186 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline SSG Snuggle Bunny

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 23049
  • Reputation: +2234/-269
  • Voted Rookie-of-the-Year, 3 years running
Bradley v Prosser: the Brawl to End Them All
« on: June 28, 2011, 05:25:16 PM »
Long thread, too long to harvest but here's a taste:

Quote
jmowreader  (1000+ posts)        Sun Jun-26-11 02:51 AM
Response to Reply #7
21. Attacking ANYONE should end his career!
 It wouldn't matter if he tried to strangle one of the men on the Wisconsin Supreme Court or a woman--they need to throw his butt off the court, then start asking the people who rigged the recent election why they were so hell-bent to put someone who'd assault one of his co-workers on the bench.

Quote
Rosa Menti (24 posts)      Sun Jun-26-11 09:41 AM
Response to Reply #18
58. The conservative brain
 has been shown to be motivated by fear. Fear often leads one to feel that defense is needed. I am in NO WAY justifying Prosser or his assault. I am suggesting that conservatives are reactionary and scared and hide behind a veneer of bravado and machismo precisely because they are unable to accept change as easily as progressive brains. The use of violence is exemplified in the military/industrial/security state. America is driven by little men and women who are afraid of their own shadows and afraid of tomorrows sunrise. Prosser needs to be "prossercuted" (new term: defined as choking a woman after she proves she is right, smart or independent. "He prossercuted her for having refused his ideas/advances.")

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=102x4896649#4896654

Still, every time we have these instant outrages it seems to blow-up on them. There's already conflicting accounts and that alone should call for prudence rather than a leap to conclusions. Moreover, Bradley has been strangely quiet about calling for an investigation, much akin to Weiner's reluctance to call for an investigation after claiming his personal security was compromised.

Yet, here they are, as they do every time.

The mere fact Prosser was--simply by coincidence--up for election on the heels of the PEU law's passage is the only reason he was targeted. But if you read the thread he is a lying, corrupt, malicious, blood-soaked, baby-killing woman beater.

Liberalism must sustain itself on morbid fantasies.

Just curious: will they be as equally vociferous in their calls for resignation if an investigation reveals Bradley came at Prosser and he was only trying to keep her from hitting him?

What if it is revealed the chief justice--who was Ploppenturd's mentor--leaked the story to leftist-friendly media rather than having a proper and formal investigation?
According to the Bible, "know" means "yes."

Offline Freeper

  • Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17779
  • Reputation: +1311/-314
  • Creepy ass cracker.
Re: Bradley v Prosser: the Brawl to End Them All
« Reply #1 on: June 28, 2011, 05:35:07 PM »
Quote
Rosa Menti (24 posts)      Sun Jun-26-11 09:41 AM
Response to Reply #18
58. The conservative brain
 has been shown to be motivated by fear. Fear often leads one to feel that defense is needed. I am in NO WAY justifying Prosser or his assault. I am suggesting that conservatives are reactionary and scared and hide behind a veneer of bravado and machismo precisely because they are unable to accept change as easily as progressive brains. The use of violence is exemplified in the military/industrial/security state. America is driven by little men and women who are afraid of their own shadows and afraid of tomorrows sunrise. Prosser needs to be "prossercuted" (new term: defined as choking a woman after she proves she is right, smart or independent. "He prossercuted her for having refused his ideas/advances.")

Liberals are scared of everything in the world. They are scared of global warming every time it gets hot in the summer. They fear guns, they fear drug tests, and they fear not having the govt right there to hold their hands all through life.

The last line about, "after she proves she is right, smart or independent" applies to DUmmies. How many of them would love to strangle Palin or Bachman?

I may not lock my doors while sitting at a red light and a black man is near, but I sure as hell grab on tight to my wallet when any democrats are close by.

Offline Ballygrl

  • Lipstick Renegade
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 14934
  • Reputation: +983/-120
Re: Bradley v Prosser: the Brawl to End Them All
« Reply #2 on: June 28, 2011, 10:53:39 PM »
Umm, the truth:

http://www.620wtmj.com/blogs/charliesykes/124652388.html

Quote
At that moment, another justice approached Bradley from behind and pulled her away from Prosser, saying, “Stop it, Ann, this isn’t like you.” Bradley then shouted, “I was choked!” Another justice present replied, “You were not choked.” In a statement following the incident, Bradley maintained Prosser “put his hands around my neck in anger in a chokehold.”
Quote
"The nation that couldn’t be conquered by foreign enemies has been conquered by its elected officials" odawg Free Republic in reference to the GOP Elites who are no difference than the Democrats

Offline thelaughingman

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 908
  • Reputation: +66/-34
Re: Bradley v Prosser: the Brawl to End Them All
« Reply #3 on: June 28, 2011, 11:19:23 PM »
Umm, the truth:

http://www.620wtmj.com/blogs/charliesykes/124652388.html


Hell, the truth gets even better than that, BG:

http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/270679/more-details-emerge-wisconsin-s-chokegate-christian-schneider

Quote
During the meeting, Chief Justice Abrahamson actually reenacted the incident on Chief Tubbs — no doubt an amusing sight, as the diminutive Abrahamson mimicked choking the tall, portly police chief. During her demonstration, Abrahamson emphasized that Prosser had exerted “pressure” on Bradley’s throat.

“There was no pressure,” interrupted the justice who had initially broken up the incident between Bradley and Prosser. “That’s only because you broke us apart,” shot back Bradley. This exchange led several meeting attendees to believe Bradley was making up the charge, as they took her rejoinder as an admission that there was no pressure applied to her neck.

Gotta love liberals who lie.  Eventually, they inadvertently let the truth slip out.

(Oh, I guess that's in your link, too.)

Offline Ballygrl

  • Lipstick Renegade
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 14934
  • Reputation: +983/-120
Re: Bradley v Prosser: the Brawl to End Them All
« Reply #4 on: June 29, 2011, 08:08:15 AM »
They lie all the time, charges need to be brought against Bradley by Prosser. These regressives are losing their freaking minds.
Quote
"The nation that couldn’t be conquered by foreign enemies has been conquered by its elected officials" odawg Free Republic in reference to the GOP Elites who are no difference than the Democrats

Offline dandi

  • Live long, and piss off liberals.
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3341
  • Reputation: +553/-28
Re: Bradley v Prosser: the Brawl to End Them All
« Reply #5 on: June 29, 2011, 09:29:57 AM »
These regressives are losing their freaking minds.

It's only going to get worse as November 2012 approaches.
I don't want...anybody else
When I think about me I touch myself

Offline thelaughingman

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 908
  • Reputation: +66/-34
Re: Bradley v Prosser: the Brawl to End Them All
« Reply #6 on: June 29, 2011, 09:52:43 AM »
They lie all the time, charges need to be brought against Bradley by Prosser. These regressives are losing their freaking minds.

Wrong tense.  They lost their minds a while ago.

Offline SSG Snuggle Bunny

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 23049
  • Reputation: +2234/-269
  • Voted Rookie-of-the-Year, 3 years running
Re: Bradley v Prosser: the Brawl to End Them All
« Reply #7 on: June 29, 2011, 10:15:25 AM »
Wrong tense.  They lost their minds a while ago.

I reject the implication you can first have a mind and *then* become a liberal.
According to the Bible, "know" means "yes."