I work at one.
I've run them, maintained them, and dare say I know as much as most, not only from a technology standpoint, but from an economic one as well.
No, DUmmies, the "safety" aspect (or lack thereof as you claim) is all in your ****ing head. So is the waste issue. Seabrook has been up and running for 20 years, and all the used fuel would fit into an Olympic-sized swimming pool. DAT is correct that if we reprocessed it (CPP up in Idaho, anyone?) it we'd end up with far less, but guess which president shut that little idea down (hint: Carter.)
And memo to DUmmies--you might want to look into it and find out what sources of energy have the highest subsidies from the government. IOW, my company loves to brag that they've got so much wind power, solar, etc. But guess what? The CNO (Chief Nuclear Officer) spoke with us a few weeks ago and stated that the new Congress would have a HUGE impact on how much expansion in those areas they did, solely because of the tax breaks they get from putting up new wind farms, etc. Bottom line, it's not a viable technology and it's certainly not cheaper. But hey, what do you care if you don't see it on your electric bill, right? Problem is, you ARE paying for it, whether you realize it or not.