Author Topic: Dear Lurkers, RE: you Blood Libel outrage  (Read 691 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline SSG Snuggle Bunny

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 23596
  • Reputation: +2501/-270
  • Voted Rookie-of-the-Year, 3 years running
Dear Lurkers, RE: you Blood Libel outrage
« on: January 12, 2011, 07:15:10 PM »
Never mind the fact that you started this fight before the bodies were evac'ed.

Never mind the fact that before Palin spoke you called it an admission of guilt.

Never mind the fact that you made this about her then accuse her of trying to media-whore.

Your outrage about Palin's use of "blood libel" is, like everything else about you, a lie straight from whatever depths of hell you have chosen to dig towards:

Quote
My friend James Taranto, who writes the Wall Street Journal’s outstanding Best of the Web Today column, has been doing yeoman’s work finding examples of the media and others freely making use of the term “blood libel” in recent years.


Debunker.
He’s been posting the examples for the past several hours on his Facebook page, and he’s on a roll so keep checking.

http://www.northstarnational.com/2011/01/12/so-the-use-of-blood-libel-is-beyond-the-pale-is-it/
According to the Bible, "know" means "yes."