Author Topic: How many people would Gifford's shooter have shot if automatic weapons  (Read 2469 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Odin's Hand

  • is your new god!
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5486
  • Reputation: +366/-25
  • Quarters Champion
This DUmmy puts its ignorance of federal firearm laws on display for all to see in the OP. Enjoy the emotional outbursts.


Quote
pnwmom  (1000+ posts)      Sat Jan-08-11 05:43 PM
Original message
How many people would Gifford's shooter have shot if automatic weapons
 Edited on Sat Jan-08-11 05:44 PM by pnwmom
weren't so easily available?

If he had only had access to a regular gun?

We shouldn't have let that federal law expire.

Quote
onehandle  (1000+ posts)      Sat Jan-08-11 06:55 PM
Response to Original message
8. The gungeoneers and their zombies will only berate you for not using proper terminology.
 Don't waste your time.

and a personal favorite from a newbie...

Quote
wikileaksfan (51 posts)      Sat Jan-08-11 07:37 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. Yeah , one fires 100 bullets a minute and the other 50 bullets a minute
 The 2nd misamendment has brought endless heartbreak to this nation. More people killed by domestic gunfire than from war. if the medium is the message, the gun is the crime. Most violent crimes would be impossible to contemplate without guns. The gun worshippers will say that the bad guys will find other ways but the fact is that over and over again, guns are the first, second and third choices of bad guys. The don't bring a gun and a bomb or a sword, they bring a bunch of guns. Damn America's sick gun culture to hell! 

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=118x353577

"Hell is full of good wishes and desires"~St. Bernhard of Clairvaux

"Brave men are found where brave men are honored."~Aristotle

"Generally speaking, the "Way of the Warrior" is resolute acceptance of death."~ Miyamoto Musashi

Offline JohnnyReb

  • In Memoriam
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 32063
  • Reputation: +1998/-134
Re: How many people would Gifford's shooter have shot if automatic weapons
« Reply #1 on: January 09, 2011, 08:19:24 AM »
The news just said it was a Glock pistol with 15 round clip.
“The American people will never knowingly adopt socialism. But, under the name of ‘liberalism’, they will adopt every fragment of the socialist program, until one day America will be a socialist nation, without knowing how it happened.” - Norman Thomas, U.S. Socialist Party presidential candidate 1940, 1944 and 1948

"America is like a healthy body and its resistance is threefold: its patriotism, its morality, and its spiritual life. If we can undermine these three areas, America will collapse from within."  Stalin

Offline Odin's Hand

  • is your new god!
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5486
  • Reputation: +366/-25
  • Quarters Champion
Re: How many people would Gifford's shooter have shot if automatic weapons
« Reply #2 on: January 09, 2011, 08:35:29 AM »
The news just said it was a Glock pistol with 15 round clip.

Yes, he had posted photos of a Glock 19 to his Facebook.com profile.
"Hell is full of good wishes and desires"~St. Bernhard of Clairvaux

"Brave men are found where brave men are honored."~Aristotle

"Generally speaking, the "Way of the Warrior" is resolute acceptance of death."~ Miyamoto Musashi

Offline BlueStateSaint

  • Here I come to save the day, because I'm a
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 32553
  • Reputation: +1560/-191
  • RIP FDNY Lt. Rich Nappi d. 4/16/12
Re: How many people would Gifford's shooter have shot if automatic weapons
« Reply #3 on: January 09, 2011, 08:52:09 AM »
I had heard a report that someone in the crowd had shot back at the gunman.
"Timid men prefer the calm of despotism to the tempestuous sea of Liberty." - Thomas Jefferson

"All you have to do is look straight and see the road, and when you see it, don't sit looking at it - walk!" -Ayn Rand
 
"Those that trust God with their safety must yet use proper means for their safety, otherwise they tempt Him, and do not trust Him.  God will provide, but so must we also." - Matthew Henry, Commentary on 2 Chronicles 32, from Matthew Henry's Commentary on the Whole Bible

"These anti-gun fools are more dangerous to liberty than street criminals or foreign spies."--Theodore Haas, Dachau Survivor

Chase her.
Chase her even when she's yours.
That's the only way you'll be assured to never lose her.

Offline PatriotGame

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4285
  • Reputation: +227/-96
  • Look at my BIG feet! Woof!
Re: How many people would Gifford's shooter have shot if automatic weapons
« Reply #4 on: January 09, 2011, 08:55:28 AM »
Quote
wikileaksfan (51 posts)      Sat Jan-08-11 07:37 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. Yeah , one fires 100 bullets a minute and the other 50 bullets a minute
 The 2nd misamendment has brought endless heartbreak to this nation. More people killed by domestic gunfire than from war. if the medium is the message, the gun is the crime. Most violent crimes would be impossible to contemplate without guns. The gun worshippers will say that the bad guys will find other ways but the fact is that over and over again, guns are the first, second and third choices of bad guys. The don't bring a gun and a bomb or a sword, they bring a bunch of guns. Damn America's sick gun culture to hell! 

Ok, I fully understand.

What you're saying is you have a very small (or zero) penis and the gun just doesn't compensate as the salesman at the Bass Pro Shop stated it would.

Sigh...

However, if you chamber a round, point the gun under your chin, and pull the trigger, the firearm will faithfully perform its socially positive supporting function...check it out...
           ►☼Liberals Are THE Root of ALL Evil!☼◄

Offline GOBUCKS

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 24186
  • Reputation: +1812/-339
  • All in all, not bad, not bad at all
Re: How many people would Gifford's shooter have shot if automatic weapons
« Reply #5 on: January 09, 2011, 09:07:52 AM »
If you subtract the ghetto rats using firearms to perform public service on one another, the rate of firearms crime in the United States among the civilized population isn't much different from the European socialist hellholes the DUmp democrats want to emulate. When violent crime strikes decent people, as it did yesterday, it's tragic, but we should nonetheless recognize and give thanks that it is also exceedingly rare.

Offline JohnnyReb

  • In Memoriam
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 32063
  • Reputation: +1998/-134
Re: How many people would Gifford's shooter have shot if automatic weapons
« Reply #6 on: January 09, 2011, 09:08:43 AM »

However, if you chamber a round, point the gun under your chin, and pull the trigger, the firearm will faithfully perform its socially positive supporting function...check it out...

Didn't one of his postings state that he tried that last January and screwed it up.
“The American people will never knowingly adopt socialism. But, under the name of ‘liberalism’, they will adopt every fragment of the socialist program, until one day America will be a socialist nation, without knowing how it happened.” - Norman Thomas, U.S. Socialist Party presidential candidate 1940, 1944 and 1948

"America is like a healthy body and its resistance is threefold: its patriotism, its morality, and its spiritual life. If we can undermine these three areas, America will collapse from within."  Stalin

Offline diesel driver

  • Creepy Ass Cracker and Smart-Ass White Boy!
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9130
  • Reputation: +609/-55
  • Enhancing My Carbon Footprint!
Re: How many people would Gifford's shooter have shot if automatic weapons
« Reply #7 on: January 09, 2011, 10:07:08 AM »
Didn't one of his postings state that he tried that last January and screwed it up.

I wouldn't be surprised.

DUmmies can **** up an anvil in a sandbox with a rubber hammer.   :hammer:
Murphy's 3rd Law:  "You can't make anything 'idiot DUmmie proof'.  The world will just create a better idiot DUmmie."

Liberals are like Slinkys.  Basically useless, but they do bring a smile to your face when you push them down a flight of stairs...
 
Global warming supporters believe that a few hundred million tons of CO2 has more control over our climate than a million mile in diameter, unshielded thermo-nuclear fusion reactor at the middle of the solar system.

"A dead enemy is a peaceful enemy.  Blessed be the peacemakers". - U.S. Marine Corp

You can't fix stupid, but you can vote it out of office.

Offline Evil_Conservative

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7845
  • Reputation: +554/-194
  • Oh snap!
Re: How many people would Gifford's shooter have shot if automatic weapons
« Reply #8 on: January 09, 2011, 10:07:17 AM »
The news just said it was a Glock pistol with 15 round clip.

A DUmmie would shit their pants as soon as I list what my husband carries:

A .357 sig, it holds 13+1 in the chamber and he ALSO carries one backup magazine.

You may call me Jessica or Jess.

Offline GOBUCKS

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 24186
  • Reputation: +1812/-339
  • All in all, not bad, not bad at all
Re: How many people would Gifford's shooter have shot if automatic weapons
« Reply #9 on: January 09, 2011, 10:39:20 AM »
A DUmmie would shit their pants as soon as I list what my husband carries:

A .357 sig, it holds 13+1 in the chamber and he ALSO carries one backup magazine.
There isn't a single DUmmy slithering around the DUmp who would know the difference between a .357 Magnum and a 9mm. They'd probably think the 9mm is more deadly because the "mm" sounds so European, and you know they're better.

Offline NHSparky

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 24431
  • Reputation: +1280/-617
  • Where are you going? I was gonna make espresso!
Re: How many people would Gifford's shooter have shot if automatic weapons
« Reply #10 on: January 09, 2011, 11:17:35 AM »
Dear DUmmies,

Klebold and Harris didn't have automatic weapons and they killed 15 people.

Seung-Hui Cho didn't have automatic weapons and he killed 32 people.

Gang-bangers in this country (mostly) don't have automatic weapons and they're responsible for THOUSANDS of deaths every year.

Maybe if you pulled your head out of your asses you'd realize it's not the weapon, it's the one pulling the trigger.  Then again, Freud did say that a fear of weapons is a sign of retarded sexual and emotional maturity.
“Any man who thinks he can be happy and prosperous by letting the government take care of him better take a closer look at the American Indian.”  -Henry Ford

Offline Thor

  • General Ne'er Do Well, Troublemaker & All Around Meanie!!
  • Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13103
  • Reputation: +363/-297
  • Native Texan & US Navy (ret)
Re: How many people would Gifford's shooter have shot if automatic weapons
« Reply #11 on: January 09, 2011, 11:29:02 AM »
Automatic weapons are not easy to get. I'm sure that if Loughner applied for a class 3 tax stamp, he would have been denied. Even then, he might have slid through. He didn't use an automatic weapon, he used a semi-auto.
"The state must declare the child to be the most precious treasure of the people. As long as the government is perceived as working for the benefit of the children, the people will happily endure almost any curtailment of liberty and almost any deprivation."- IBID

I AM your General Ne'er Do Well, Troublemaker & All Around Meanie!!

"Congress has not unlimited powers to provide for the general welfare, but only those specifically enumerated."-Thomas Jefferson

Offline Freeper

  • Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17779
  • Reputation: +1311/-314
  • Creepy ass cracker.
Re: How many people would Gifford's shooter have shot if automatic weapons
« Reply #12 on: January 09, 2011, 11:33:11 AM »
Automatic weapons are not easy to get. I'm sure that if Loughner applied for a class 3 tax stamp, he would have been denied. Even then, he might have slid through. He didn't use an automatic weapon, he used a semi-auto.

It doesn't matter if he used a a BB gun the libs would still be in, ban all guns mode over this.
All the libs care about is getting political points from this. You know, never let a crisis go to waste, as a certain presidential adviser once said, and no I don't mean KKKarl Rove.

I may not lock my doors while sitting at a red light and a black man is near, but I sure as hell grab on tight to my wallet when any democrats are close by.

Offline jukin

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 16232
  • Reputation: +2115/-170
Re: How many people would Gifford's shooter have shot if automatic weapons
« Reply #13 on: January 09, 2011, 11:37:22 AM »
Weak argument.
When you are the beneficiary of someone’s kindness and generosity, it produces a sense of gratitude and community.

When you are the beneficiary of a policy that steals from someone and gives it to you in return for your vote, it produces a sense of entitlement and dependency.

Offline vesta111

  • In Memoriam
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9712
  • Reputation: +493/-1154
Re: How many people would Gifford's shooter have shot if automatic weapons
« Reply #14 on: January 09, 2011, 12:35:00 PM »
Automatic weapons are not easy to get. I'm sure that if Loughner applied for a class 3 tax stamp, he would have been denied. Even then, he might have slid through. He didn't use an automatic weapon, he used a semi-auto.

Cars and trucks make dandy weapons, they have, in the wrong hands taken out more lives then a single hand gun. Thousands every year.  A few cars have taken out 20-30 people at a time by running into street fairs or parades.  Strange but Gay Parades have not yet had that problem.
 
A single oil lamp in the wrong hands burned down Chicago when Mrs. Murphy's cow kicked it over.

A dozen men, with just box cutters, 3 hijacked planes, 3000+ lives lost.

Guns are like fire.   Both are necessary for the protection and lives of the worlds people---in the right hands.  Put either in the wrong hands and devastation happens

Family's large and small have one or two members that are all ways in trouble for one thing or another. Not only do we have to protect ourselves from strangers but at times our own kin folk.

Fire arms have been around as a protection for people since they were invented.  There would not be a USA without the fire arm for hunting for food and protection.  The 6 gun revolver was a peace keeper and won the west.

I as an American demand my right to continue my American tradition and right by the COTUS.

I have great fear the anti-protection people will now demand stronger laws against personal protection.They may gloom onto this incident to cause us peace keeping folks unarmed.

So sad what happend but, when Lincoln was shot, Kennedy and his brother also there was no hue and cry until Brady and Regan were shot .

This incidence is going to stir up the sleeping Libs that wish to disarm us.


Offline catsmtrods

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2216
  • Reputation: +229/-24
Re: How many people would Gifford's shooter have shot if automatic weapons
« Reply #15 on: January 09, 2011, 01:20:23 PM »
Gun banners are just stoooopid!
Lets ck history,
Prohibition, what happen?
OK lets look at now,
There has been a war on drugs for the last 30 or so years, what is happening?
Gee, murder is outlawed and he still did that!
What makes people think that banning things will make them go away? There is a black market for every illegal thing you can think of! I stand by the old saying "If guns are out lawed only outlaws will have guns" and of course we will all be outlaws!
"Liberalism is an essentially feminine, submissive world view. Perhaps a better adjective than feminine is infantile. It is the world view of men who do not have the moral toughness, the spiritual strength to stand up and do single combat with life, who cannot adjust to the reality that the world is not a huge, pink-and-blue, padded nursery in which the lions lie down with the lambs and everyone lives happily ever after."


~ Dr. William Pierce


 

"How many more times are we going to cower under tables and chairs, whimpering like mindless dogs, thinking that someone else has the responsibility to save and protect us?"

Offline Randy

  • Resident Grouch with a
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4244
  • Reputation: +202/-39
  • Odd
Re: How many people would Gifford's shooter have shot if automatic weapons
« Reply #16 on: January 09, 2011, 01:36:46 PM »
There was some moron on Fox this morning that said if his gun hadn't been able to fire that many round he wouldn't have been able to shoot that many people.

I knew the dipshit had never heard of the word reload before.

Besides he shot 13 and killed 6 so he had to have reloaded at least once.

Offline GOBUCKS

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 24186
  • Reputation: +1812/-339
  • All in all, not bad, not bad at all
Re: How many people would Gifford's shooter have shot if automatic weapons
« Reply #17 on: January 09, 2011, 03:01:33 PM »
Quote
pnwmom  (1000+ posts)      Sat Jan-08-11 05:43 PM
Original message
How many people would Gifford's shooter have shot if automatic weapons
weren't so easily available?

If he had only had access to a regular gun?

We shouldn't have let that federal law expire.

There is apparently some kind of quirk in the DUmpmonkey genome that prevents them from understanding the difference between semi-automatic and automatic.

And they steadfastly ignore the fact that this blue dog democrat, for whom the DUmp had a burning hatred until Saturday morning, was a Glock owner herself:

Quote
yarisa69 (13 posts)      Sun Jan-09-11 02:50 PM
Response to Original message
4. I'm not sure but....
the congresswoman said she owned one.

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/03/26/us/politics/26threat....

'Ms. Giffords, at least, said she would uphold Arizona’s tradition of self-protection.

“I have a Glock 9-millimeter, and I’m a pretty good shot,” she said.'

I wonder if the weapon was chosen specifically because of this quote.