Author Topic: Anchors ( babies) Aweigh, my boys  (Read 1087 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline thundley4

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 40571
  • Reputation: +2224/-127
Anchors ( babies) Aweigh, my boys
« on: August 11, 2010, 03:25:20 PM »
Quote
babylonsister   (1000+ posts)             Wed Aug-11-10 02:43 PM
Original message
Public evenly split on changing 14th amendment?
   
http://voices.washingtonpost.com/plum-line/2010/08/publ...


Public evenly split on changing 14th amendment?

An amazing finding, just in from CNN:

As you may know, the Constitution says that all children born in the United States are automatically U.S. citizens regardless of their parents' status. Would you favor or oppose a Constitutional amendment to prevent children born here from becoming U.S. citizens unless their parents are also U.S. citizens?

Favor 49%

Oppose 51%

No opinion 1%


The public is just about evenly split on whether to repeal birthright citizenship. Hey, what's another Constitutional amendment between friends, anyway?

Perhaps this reflects frustration with the government's failure to solve the illegal immigration problem. Or perhaps the decision by some GOP officials to openly flirt with changing the 14th amendment is succeeding in legitimizing the idea. Or maybe both those factors are combining to produce a toxic result: The mainstreaming of ideas that by any measure should be dismissed as extreme by public officials and voters alike.

Oh, one other result in the poll: A solid majority, 60 percent, favors the $26 billion in aid for teachers. A majority of independents, 57 percent, also favors it. Only Republicans oppose it.

By Greg Sargent
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x8925875

Quote
DJ13 (1000+ posts)           Wed Aug-11-10 02:45 PM
Response to Original message
1. Supporting illegal immigration is a losing strategy with many voters
   
I dont know why that isnt acknowledged by our party, but its true.

It's supporting future criminal dem voters.

Quote
vi5 (1000+ posts)         Wed Aug-11-10 02:50 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. So the 14th amendment was put into place in 1868...
   
..to support illegal immigration?

Really? That's what it's about?

According to the left, yes.

Quote
mmonk   (1000+ posts)             Wed Aug-11-10 03:01 PM
Response to Reply #1
16. Who supports illegal immigration?

Obama and his DOJ, for starters.


Offline miskie

  • Mailman for the VRWC
  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10461
  • Reputation: +1035/-54
  • Make America Great Again. Deport some DUmmies.
Re: Anchors ( babies) Aweigh, my boys
« Reply #1 on: August 11, 2010, 04:19:27 PM »
I love the way the "Living Document" people are all hard-core Libertarians now when it comes to their view of The Constitution.

Offline Ballygrl

  • Lipstick Renegade
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 14934
  • Reputation: +983/-120
Re: Anchors ( babies) Aweigh, my boys
« Reply #2 on: August 11, 2010, 07:11:14 PM »
No reference at all to Canada and not allowing citizenship to illegal babies born there?
Quote
"The nation that couldn’t be conquered by foreign enemies has been conquered by its elected officials" odawg Free Republic in reference to the GOP Elites who are no difference than the Democrats

Offline Tucker

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10937
  • Reputation: +540/-97
  • Making money the old fashioned way- Paid Mole
Re: Anchors ( babies) Aweigh, my boys
« Reply #3 on: August 11, 2010, 09:19:27 PM »
Come to think of it, unions do create jobs. Companies have to hire two workers to do the work of one.

Offline AllosaursRus

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11672
  • Reputation: +424/-293
  • Skip Tracing by Contract Only!
Re: Anchors ( babies) Aweigh, my boys
« Reply #4 on: August 12, 2010, 01:02:33 PM »
I've always never understood how anyone can become a citizen by another party committing an illegal act.
I'm the guy your mother warned you about!