Well, doc, I didn't say he wasn't a very successful dumbass, I feel pretty much the same way about Stephen King. Formula, yawn.
'Glaring historical inaccuracies,' unless the story is clearly supposed to be set in an alternate timeline or alternate reality, totally shatter my willing suspension of disbelief.
I would argue that King "jumped the shark" a long time ago, inasmuch as his work has become boring, and not nearly as imaginative as his early stuff (IMO, the
"Stand" was the last readable piece that he did) ........further, he writes in a completely different genre than Brown.
I find Brown's work entertaining.......I'm not part of the cult that evolved around
"The DaVinci Code", it is just interesting historical fiction, and he spins a good yarn. He does well what most successful fiction writers have learned to do.....take a kernel of history, and expand it into a tale........
You might not like his stuff, but he laughs all the way to the bank.........everything that he writes is an instant "best seller", and so far most are either presently adapted to film, or are in the pipeline.....
It's hard to argue with success......
doc