Doug's poor, stupid ex-wife Beth, pacing back and forth in the Airstream out there in the midst of cactus and tumbleweed, as she waits to see how the voting turned out, starts worrying about how Shameeka and Tameeka, or whatever their names are, will come up with the cash for their abortions someday:
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Sat Dec-19-09 06:03 PM
Doesn't Barack Obama have TWO daughters?
What is he thinking?
What kind of empath is he that he will take this "victory" on the backs of low income women's access to abortion?
I thought he was better than that.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x7275186Is the Kenyan an empath? What is an empath? Can they, like, channel the dead? Is it anything like a psychopath?
leftstreet (1000+ posts) Sat Dec-19-09 06:04 PM
2. His daughters will never be working class
Rich people won't be troubled by this bill
Wrong, dogbreath. "Rich" people, i.e., those who are gainfully employed, will have to pay for this monstrous boondoggle.
They hate it even more than you deadbeats do.
AllentownJake (1000+ posts) Sat Dec-19-09 06:05 PM
Response to Original message
3. Do you honestly think a Presidents children
will be ever for want.
The children argument, is low class to make, and holds no weight in any regard.
Yeah, Beth. Leave Shameela and Takeela out of this!
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Sat Dec-19-09 06:07 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Wrong. What is good enough for the president's daughters
is good enough for my nieces.
Oh, I don't think that's right, Beth. Your nieces have been unfortunate to be born in to a family of deranged losers.
Maleeka and Dasheeka have been born into the Chicago democrat machine. Huge difference.
AllentownJake (1000+ posts) Sat Dec-19-09 06:10 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Leave Sasha and Malia out of policy discussions
I do not believe bringing the spouses or children of politicians is fair game for political commentary.
What? Did those skanky Bush twins finally enlist? At least there have never been any DUmp comments about the Palin kids.
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Sat Dec-19-09 06:15 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. Sasha and Malia will never have to contend with the reality
that most women will with this curtailing of access to abortion.
****ing spare me your scruples for these two privileged girls while you overlook the consequences for most working class women.
You have to be kidding! Are those really their names?!?
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Sat Dec-19-09 06:23 PM
Original message
Nope. Obama is willing to get his "victory" at the cost of abortion access.
His family should be no more protected than any woman who is being denied medical care.
I understand what you are saying about the girls. But, denying abortion access amounts to the same kind of invasiveness.
And I'm fully willing to be tasteless in support of access to abortion.
I must have missed it. Does this boondoggle bill outlaw the killing of infants? Maybe there is something to support.
stray cat (1000+ posts) Sat Dec-19-09 06:15 PM
9. Thats cheap - like Rush and McCain making fun of Amy Carter
McCain?
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Sat Dec-19-09 06:17 PM
11. Well, no. That's calling out hypocrisy.
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Sat Dec-19-09 06:26 PM
Response to Reply #20
26. Because abortion rights are somehow under your radar. Cool.
You might think for a minute about that.
They're not under mine.
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Sat Dec-19-09 06:24 PM
Response to Reply #17
21. Bullshit. Obama is going to claim victory on the back of women's rights.
There's nothing cheaper than that.
Clinton put even more women on their backs, but the DUmp loves him.
HipChick (1000+ posts) Sat Dec-19-09 06:26 PM
Response to Original message
27. OP using kids to make a point here is pretty sick..
These DUmmies who are slamming poor, stupid Beth don't realize she's campaigning for votes.
But unfortunately, she's too dumb to realize the voting ended at midnight.
