Author Topic: NYT Environment Reporter Floats Idea: Give Carbon Credits to Couples That Limit  (Read 1260 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Chris_

  • Little Lebowski Urban Achiever
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 46845
  • Reputation: +2028/-266
Quote
NYT Environment Reporter Floats Idea: Give Carbon Credits to Couples That Limit Themselves to One Child

Washington (CNSNews.com) – Andrew Revkin, who reports on environmental issues for The New York Times, floated an idea last week for combating global warming: Give carbon credits to couples that limit themselves to having one child.

Revkin later told CNSNews.com that he was not endorsing the idea, just trying to provoke some thinking on the topic.
 
Revkin participated via Web camera in an Oct. 14 panel discussion on “Covering Climate: What’s Population Got to Do With It” that was held at the Woodrow Wilson Center in Washington, D.C.  The other participants on the panel were Dennis Dimick, executive editor of National Geographic, and Emily Douglas, web editor for The Nation magazine.

*snip*

“So should there be, eventually you get, should you get credit--If we're going to become carbon-centric--for having a one-child family when you could have had two or three," said Revkin. "And obviously it's just a thought experiment, but it raises some interesting questions about all this.”

*snip*

“More children equal more carbon dioxide emissions,” blogged Revkin. “And recent research has resulted in renewed coverage of the notion that one of the cheapest ways to curb emissions in coming decades would be to provide access to birth control for tens of millions of women around the world who say they desire it.

“I recently raised the question of whether this means we’ll soon see a market in baby-avoidance carbon credits similar to efforts to sell CO2 credits for avoiding deforestation,” he later added. “This is purely a thought experiment, not a proposal.”

What a moron.  He must bathe in algore's kool-aid.   :bs:

MORE
If you want to worship an orange pile of garbage with a reckless disregard for everything, get on down to Arbys & try our loaded curly fries.

Offline jtyangel

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9116
  • Reputation: +497/-110
Ok, let's play his game. Give 'social security credits' to those with more then one kid since those extra children will be funding the actual system. If the person with one kid can't make their ss check off that one kid then reduce their benefits by the difference. Just sayin' :uhsure:(sorry peeps, trying to use some liberal logic here) :-)

Offline JohnnyReb

  • In Memoriam
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 32063
  • Reputation: +1998/-134
Just sayin' :uhsure:(sorry peeps, trying to use some liberal logic here) :-)

Liberals should be required to put warning labels on their 'logic'.
“The American people will never knowingly adopt socialism. But, under the name of ‘liberalism’, they will adopt every fragment of the socialist program, until one day America will be a socialist nation, without knowing how it happened.” - Norman Thomas, U.S. Socialist Party presidential candidate 1940, 1944 and 1948

"America is like a healthy body and its resistance is threefold: its patriotism, its morality, and its spiritual life. If we can undermine these three areas, America will collapse from within."  Stalin

Offline jinxmchue

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3841
  • Reputation: +114/-26
Oh. yay!  Great idea!  Let's be just like China!

Offline Deuce

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 174
  • Reputation: +0/-0
Quote
“This is purely a thought experiment, not a proposal.”

That is the warning label.

Offline SSG Snuggle Bunny

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 23544
  • Reputation: +2473/-270
  • Voted Rookie-of-the-Year, 3 years running
And if you can kill 1 limousine liberal to be allowed to have up to 8 more children.
According to the Bible, "know" means "yes."