Author Topic: Jodi Corzine  (Read 1703 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline NHSparky

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 24431
  • Reputation: +1280/-617
  • Where are you going? I was gonna make espresso!
Jodi Corzine
« on: September 09, 2009, 09:07:38 AM »
Jodi Corzine (RINO-CT)
Connecticut follows Trenton and Albany up the tax charts.

August 29, 2009

WSJ.com

LINK

<excerpt>

Connecticut grabs $7,007 in state and local taxes per man, woman and child resident, according to the Tax Foundation, more per capita than every state but New York and New Jersey. That's hardly the company any state would want to keep these days, but the politicians in Hartford seem intent on following Trenton and Albany off the tax-and-spend cliff.

This week Republican Governor Jodi Rell proposed a $1-billion-plus income tax hike, raising the top tax rate to 6.5% from 5% on individuals with incomes above $500,000 and couples with earnings above $1 million to close an expected two-year $8.5 billion budget deficit. The tax hike would be retroactive to January 1, meaning the government would snatch money that residents have already earned. Perhaps she aspires to the nether-world approval ratings of New Jersey Governor Jon Corzine.

Given the size of its deficit, it's hard to believe that for 200 years Connecticut balanced its budget without any income tax and became the richest state in the bargain. That changed in 1991 when then-Governor Lowell Weicker pushed the state's first-ever personal income tax with a promise that the rate would remain flat at 4.5%. But the next time the state couldn't pay its bills, in 2001, the legislature raised Mr. Weicker's tax to 5%. In 2007, Ms. Rell wanted more money for the schools, so she proposed raising the income tax again. That plan failed, but now comes her "millionaire surcharge," which Democrats have eagerly endorsed.

But why? Since the income tax became law, Connecticut has experienced a long, slow exodus of jobs and people. The Yankee Institute notes the astounding fact that since 1992, the year the income tax went into effect, businesses in Connecticut have hired a grand total of zero net new workers. This is while the nation added 22 million jobs and despite the Wall Street boom. As the tax burden has surged, the state lost population to other states (a net 113,000) in every year but one over the last decade.

What the income tax did stimulate was a spending binge and big pay raises for the state's unionized government workers. The year before the income tax was enacted, Connecticut's government expenditures per capita ranked right in the middle of all states; now it ranks in the top 10. Per capita real spending has nearly doubled since the income tax was enacted.

===================================================================================================

And to think there are a ton of 'Rats in NH who want to enact both a sales and income tax.  If that happens, color me gone.  It's already bad enough with the increase in property taxes and other "fees" they've thrown on us over the past two years.
“Any man who thinks he can be happy and prosperous by letting the government take care of him better take a closer look at the American Indian.”  -Henry Ford

Offline DumbAss Tanker

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 28493
  • Reputation: +1710/-151
Re: Jodi Corzine
« Reply #1 on: September 09, 2009, 10:01:38 AM »
A 6.5% top income tax rate for the state is really not far out of the norm, I believe it's 6% here in my sleepy little corner of flyover country.  Of course just the top income tax rate does not come close to telling the whole tax story for a state, without looking at whether they allow additional county surtaxes (Like Maryland - brutal!) or major city surtaxes (Like NYC - double brutal!), as well as ad valorem taxes on vehicles, excise taxes, sales taxes, etc.
Go and tell the Spartans, O traveler passing by
That here, obedient to their law, we lie.

Anything worth shooting once is worth shooting at least twice.

Offline thundley4

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 40571
  • Reputation: +2224/-127
Re: Jodi Corzine
« Reply #2 on: September 09, 2009, 10:14:37 AM »
A 6.5% top income tax rate for the state is really not far out of the norm, I believe it's 6% here in my sleepy little corner of flyover country.  Of course just the top income tax rate does not come close to telling the whole tax story for a state, without looking at whether they allow additional county surtaxes (Like Maryland - brutal!) or major city surtaxes (Like NYC - double brutal!), as well as ad valorem taxes on vehicles, excise taxes, sales taxes, etc.

Illinois currently has a flat 3% income tax for everyone, but Governor Quinn has proposed to more than double that on the "rich". I'm not sure about what he considers rich.

Offline DumbAss Tanker

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 28493
  • Reputation: +1710/-151
Re: Jodi Corzine
« Reply #3 on: September 09, 2009, 10:27:27 AM »
Illinois currently has a flat 3% income tax for everyone, but Governor Quinn has proposed to more than double that on the "rich". I'm not sure about what he considers rich.

They get it in other ways; gas, for instance, is generally considerably more expensive on his side of the River, due to taxes.
Go and tell the Spartans, O traveler passing by
That here, obedient to their law, we lie.

Anything worth shooting once is worth shooting at least twice.

Offline NHSparky

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 24431
  • Reputation: +1280/-617
  • Where are you going? I was gonna make espresso!
Re: Jodi Corzine
« Reply #4 on: September 09, 2009, 10:57:20 AM »
They get it in other ways; gas, for instance, is generally considerably more expensive on his side of the River, due to taxes.

NH, like a lot of other New England states, is adopting a, "tax your neighbor" mentality, or as I like to call it, "buddy-****er taxes".  Not all them apply as heavily to local residents, such as the 9 percent meals/lodging tax (which this year extended to campgrounds as well), but gas, cigarette, and alcohol taxes are just marginally lower than Mass/Maine as to attract border-dashers.  The main sources of taxes here are property taxes (3rd highest in the nation) and business taxes (2nd only to Mass.). 

So, in order to overcome any shortfall, Lynch has jacked up fees and other taxes such as vehicle registration (already ungodly), real estate transfer taxes (also proposed to cover refinances), gravel tax, timber tax, VIEW taxes on top of the state/local property taxes, etc.  Of course, when asked, nobody says the property taxes will come down if or when a sales/income tax is implemented.
“Any man who thinks he can be happy and prosperous by letting the government take care of him better take a closer look at the American Indian.”  -Henry Ford