It does address quite a few failings in logic on their part. Including one that is a problem over here too: The concept that no bread is better than half a loaf.
Actually, that is a bit of anguish that quite a few conservatives need to think over. Here in Oregon the last senate contest was between a RINO or a dimmi Jihadi. Is the Dimmi Jihadi better than the RINO? Are you going to sit out and let the Jihadi win because the RINO is a RINO?
Oh, I agree wholeheartedly, sir.
When the choice is between a RINO and a Democrat, the RINO is always the better choice.
One has to look at the whole picture, the big picture.
Republicans are generally conservative, and it best serves conservatism when Republicans control Congress.
If it takes a RINO to give Republicans control of the Senate or the House, well, Hell, no contest.
We're not Democrats, liberals, or primitives, after all.