DUmmies wish they knew how to quit McKinney

[BannedFromDU]

HopeOverFear  (680 posts)  Journal  Click to send private message to this author  Click to view this author's profile  Click to add this author to your buddy list  Click to add this author to your Ignore list      Tue May-05-09 02:24 AM
Original message
Cynthia McKinney - Obama Buyer's Remorse   Updated at 4:17 PM
   
(I don't agree with her views but I still wanted to post this for those who hadn't seen it).

http://www.voxunion.com/?p=1085

Of late, I’m been approached by four types of voters: one voter type knew about our Power to the People campaign and enthusiastically supported it. They find themselves in the position of not wanting to say, “I told you so” too loudly, but certainly say it among themselves and to each other.

Increasingly, though, there’s another type of voter that is contacting me, expressing “Buyer’s Remorse” for having supported candidate Barack Obama. These voters can be futher subdivided into three categories: those who voted for Obama, not knowing very much about our Power to the People campaign; those who voted for Obama, knowing a lot about Rosa, me, and the Power to the People campaign, but who chose instead to vote for Obama out of fear of a McCain/Palin White House; and finally, those who knew about our Power to the People campaign and were hostile to it because they were suspicious that our campaign was designed to deny the White House to candidate Obama–the spoiler campaign. Fortunately and hopefully, because of the integrity with which we ran our campaign, those in this latter category are few in terms of their numbers in communication with me.

For me, the number of people contacting me expressing regret for having voted for Obama is a double-edged sword. That is, it indicates that prior to the election, we were not able to seal the deal with a significant number of our natural voters. There are many reasons for that, but being severely underfunded lies at the base of that failing. However, on the other hand, these expressions of “buyer’s remorse” indicate that people knowingly allowed themselves to be swept into the voting booth and vote against their values.

I am happy that more and more people are freely expressing their support for the platform of the Power to the People campaign. I am extremely happy that more and more people express their interest in supporting me in another political endeavor, be it another Congressional or White House run. I am particularly pleased that people are willing to explore the possibilities that politics outside the box of two-party conformity can provide. But I have to admit that I am saddened by the fact that so many people fail to understand that in the transaction of a political election, there is no warranty for “buyer’s remorse.” The crescendo of well-financed political propaganda is all geared toward achieving the desired result on election day and there is no denouement.

The desired result is to have as many voters as possible stay within the political confines of either of the two special interest parties because their candidates have already been vetted and have agreed to certain restrictions in the area of public policy. That’s why our Power to the People campaign was the only one talking about instituting full employment and a living wage, subsidizing education through college so that students would not have to take out loans to go to college, creating green jobs (like solar panel manufacture) in neighborhoods blighted by abandoned big box buildings, having former Comptroller of the U.S. David Walker perform audits of the companies that got bailout money, nationalizing the Federal Reserve, creating publicly owned neighborhood banks, thereby finally creating an economy that worked for the people instead of the special interests. And shutting down the military-industrial complex’s Empire America.

Our agenda provided a clear route to an end to torture, rendition for torture, warrantless wiretapping, spying on U.S. citizen activists, and an end to war. Not just an end to the war on terror, but a clear end to war and occupation. And now that the Obama Administration has used its Justice Department to argue in court in favor of those who ordered torture, and to defend Bush Administration policies of torture, rendition, warrantless wiretapping, and extra-legal treatment of so-called “enemy combatants,” most of whom have committed no crime (like six-year Guantanamo Prisoner number 345, Sami El-Hajj, who was on the Dignity with me as I tried to make it to Gaza). On these issues, the Obama Administration is consonant with the Bush Administration. No wonder Bush et al have more to worry about from the “small-d” democrats in Spain than from the “big-D” Democrats in Washington, DC.

Blah blah blah conspiracy whitey execute 5000 Katrina whitey this whitey that

They still love her, I assure you


Lots of people on that thread pointing and laughing at McKinney, but get this:

Recommend (13 votes)     

Also:

BeFree  (1000+ posts)    Tue May-05-09 01:14 PM
Response to Reply #1
37. The old head in sand approach, eh?
   
""I choose not to read it""

Yes, Gawd forbid you choose to read something that might, just might get you to question your beliefs!! That's the way to stay edumacated, right?

Thankfully not everyone is so hard-headed. What she has to say makes a lot of sense in the light that some in our party do side with the slave owners against us slaves. Given who Ms. McKinney is and her history, she does have a better picture of the slave/slave-owner realities and she elucidates that vision well.

But you choose not to read it?? And some people wonder why this country is in such a mess....

LostinVA      Tue May-05-09 02:23 PM
Response to Reply #16
72. McKinney has done so much for rights and for the downtrodden
   
Edited on Tue May-05-09 02:25 PM by LostinVA
She fought teh man. She deserves much more respect on here than she gets.

earth mom  (1000+ posts)      Tue May-05-09 04:49 PM
Response to Original message
102. McKinney is one of the few voices speaking the truth.
   
Not surprised to see the same old names on this thread-doing their best to silence her and paint her as fringe which she is not. :grr:

She's one of the few people who looks EXACTLY like you'd imagine a ****ing nutball to look:

[USA4ME]

J - E - W - S

.

[DumbAss Tanker]

She's one of the few people who looks EXACTLY like you'd imagine a ****ing nutball to look

H5 for that one!

 

[DixieBelle]

Has she slapped any cops lately?

[AllosaursRus]

She seriously thinks she could make a run at the WH???????????

Now THAT IS batshit crazy!!!!!!!!!

[delilahmused]

LOL, for some reason this thread reminded me of this:

[youtube=425,350]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Uy2tEP3I3DM[/youtube]

Cindie

[franksolich]

She seriously thinks she could make a run at the WH???????????

Now THAT IS batshit crazy!!!!!!!!!

Well now, the primitives showed their true colors during the last election.

The primitives could have gotten behind not only someone black, but someone female, thus killing two birds with one stone.

But no, the primitives showed their true colors by going for the guy rather than the girl.

If that isn't sexism, I don't know sexism.