Author Topic: Supreme Court Throws Out Ruling on Janet Jackson Wardrobe Malfunction  (Read 1269 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Chris_

  • Little Lebowski Urban Achiever
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 46845
  • Reputation: +2028/-266
Quote
Supreme Court Throws Out Ruling on Janet Jackson Wardrobe Malfunction

WASHINGTON —  The Supreme Court on Monday ordered a federal appeals court to re-examine its ruling in favor of CBS Corp. in a legal fight over entertainer Janet Jackson's wardrobe malfunction.

The high court on Monday directed the 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Philadelphia to consider reinstating the $550,000 fine that the Federal Communications Commission imposed on CBS over Jackson's breast-baring performance at the 2004 Super Bowl.

The order follows the high court ruling last week that narrowly upheld the FCC's policy threatening fines against even one-time uses of curse words on live television.

Last year, the appeals court threw out the fine against CBS, saying the FCC strayed from its long-held approach of applying identical standards to words and images when reviewing complaints of indecency.

Buncha Boobs

 :whatever:
If you want to worship an orange pile of garbage with a reckless disregard for everything, get on down to Arbys & try our loaded curly fries.

Offline jinxmchue

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3841
  • Reputation: +114/-26
The should be fined simply for traumatizing people with such an ugly breast.

Offline Lord Undies

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11388
  • Reputation: +639/-250
This too pleases me.  I would not be in favor of any fine if the network had been honest about the performance in the first place.  It wasn't a "wardrobe malfunction".  The wardrobe functioned exactly as designed.

Offline Chris_

  • Little Lebowski Urban Achiever
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 46845
  • Reputation: +2028/-266
This too pleases me.  I would not be in favor of any fine if the network had been honest about the performance in the first place.  It wasn't a "wardrobe malfunction".  The wardrobe functioned exactly as designed.
...it was a nuclear dress....with "fallout".   :-)
If you want to worship an orange pile of garbage with a reckless disregard for everything, get on down to Arbys & try our loaded curly fries.

Offline jinxmchue

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3841
  • Reputation: +114/-26
This too pleases me.  I would not be in favor of any fine if the network had been honest about the performance in the first place.  It wasn't a "wardrobe malfunction".  The wardrobe functioned exactly as designed.

Kind of like the "impromptu" swearing at the Billboard Awards a while back.  Totally scripted.