It was done years ago, late 80's I believe for an automatic pay raise. However they have to vote for it every year and have done so for the past five years. It's usually tied in with other goverment raises.
No, not quite.
I did some research on this some months back (and no, I'm not going to dig it up again), but the whole business on congressional pay raises used to be a matter of a vote, and how much.
Once upon a time, Congress used to physically vote Yea or Nay on their own pay raises. Pretty straightforward, that. But it doesn't take a rocket scientist to figure out that that kind of practice led to some political ramifications. Oh, My! What to do???
In the late Nineties, Congress changed the way they'd vote for their own pay raises. Instead of voting
for a pay raise, they changed the method such that the pay raise was automatic -- under a very complicated system -- unless they voted to
deny their pay raise.
IIRC, for 2000 and 2001, maybe even 2002, Congress actually denied their own pay raises. But then they decided to not do anything, which, of course, means they voted for it. And since that time, it's been more of the same.
I wonder if John Kerry had anything to do with drafting this legislation....."I was for it before I was against it...."
I wouldn't have such a problem with a pay raise -- hell, as an Army retiree I'm getting a healthy one for 2009 -- but I feel that this kind of bullshit is duplicitous and disengenuous. Let's be transparent about this stuff, Congress!