« previous next »
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: Study: Coverage of McCain Much More Negative Than That of Obama  (Read 1720 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Chris_

  • Little Lebowski Urban Achiever
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 46845
  • Reputation: +2028/-266
Study: Coverage of McCain Much More Negative Than That of Obama
« on: October 23, 2008, 07:49:59 AM »
Quote
Study: Coverage of McCain Much More Negative Than That of Obama

Media coverage of John McCain has been heavily unfavorable since the political conventions, more than three times as negative as the portrayal of Barack Obama, a new study says.

Fifty-seven percent of the print and broadcast stories about the Republican nominee were decidedly negative, the Project for Excellence in Journalism says in a report out today, while 14 percent were positive. The McCain campaign has repeatedly complained that the mainstream media are biased toward the senator from Illinois.

Obama's coverage was more balanced during the six-week period from Sept. 8 through last Thursday, with 36 percent of the stories clearly positive, 35 percent neutral or mixed and 29 percent negative.


MORE

In other news water is wet and Barry is a  :censored: liberal.
Logged
If you want to worship an orange pile of garbage with a reckless disregard for everything, get on down to Arbys & try our loaded curly fries.

Offline Flame

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4361
  • Reputation: +166/-34
Re: Study: Coverage of McCain Much More Negative Than That of Obama
« Reply #1 on: October 23, 2008, 08:09:06 AM »
I'm shocked....shocked I tell you!
Logged

Offline USA4ME

  • Evil Capitalist
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 14835
  • Reputation: +2476/-76
Re: Study: Coverage of McCain Much More Negative Than That of Obama
« Reply #2 on: October 23, 2008, 08:28:18 AM »
You mean they have to do a study to discover the obvious?

Let's help them out.  Hey Project for Excellence in Journalism, in 2 years the media will be more favorable towards Democrats than Republicans.  And then 2 years after that it'll also be true,  And in other 2 years, it'll still be true.  Now you can save yourself the time.

.
Logged
Because third world peasant labor is a good thing.

Offline djones520

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4207
  • Reputation: +181/-146
Re: Study: Coverage of McCain Much More Negative Than That of Obama
« Reply #3 on: October 23, 2008, 08:36:53 AM »
Was discussing the media being in the bag for Obama with someone...  They said I had no basis for that claim.   :lmao:
Logged
"Chuck Norris once had sex in an 18 wheeler. Some of his semen dripped onto the engine. We now call that truck Optimus Prime."

Offline Ptarmigan

  • Bunny Slayer
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 24088
  • Reputation: +1009/-226
  • God Hates Bunnies
Re: Study: Coverage of McCain Much More Negative Than That of Obama
« Reply #4 on: October 24, 2008, 11:41:33 AM »
Well gees, what do ya expect?
Logged
Never interrupt your enemy when he is making a mistake.
-Napoleon Bonaparte

Allow enemies their space to hate; they will destroy themselves in the process.
-Lisa Du
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »