« previous next »
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: Why not a national maximum wage?  (Read 1904 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Carl

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 19837
  • Reputation: +1617/-100
Why not a national maximum wage?
« on: September 21, 2008, 12:20:46 PM »
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x4051300

Quote
randr  (1000+ posts)         Sun Sep-21-08 01:03 PM
Original message
Why not a national maximum wage?
   Advertisements [?]

If we can accept minimum wage standards why not maximum standards?


DUmmy economics...this should get funny.

Quote
RUMMYisFROSTED  (1000+ posts)        Sun Sep-21-08 01:15 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. A progressive rate that hits 100% does the job nicely. Totally legal.
   If loopholes are closed.
Yeah,everyone will stand for that. :whatever:

Quote
dkofos (1000+ posts)        Sun Sep-21-08 01:15 PM
Response to Original message
5. I'd rather we tax the rich at 50% or more.
   The govt. does need the money.

 :bird:
Logged

Offline Zeus

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3265
  • Reputation: +174/-112
Re: Why not a national maximum wage?
« Reply #1 on: September 21, 2008, 12:24:14 PM »
Unfortunately for many of the dummies the mininum wage is the maxinum wage. Sometimes you gotta be careful what you ask for.
Logged
It is said that branches draw their life from the vine. Each is separate yet all are one as they share one life giving stem . The Bible tells us we are called to a similar union in life, our lives with the life of God. We are incorporated into him; made sharers in his life. Apart from this union we can do nothing.

Offline Chris

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1476
  • Reputation: +522/-16
Re: Why not a national maximum wage?
« Reply #2 on: September 21, 2008, 12:32:35 PM »
I'd love to see the brain trusts over there get together and come up with a workable definition of "rich".  The top tax rate starts at $300,000 a year.  So, there's no difference between some Hollywood liberal who gets $20 million for a single movie and the small-business owner who works 90 hours a week and claims his entire business earnings on his 1040A. 
Logged
This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate.

Offline GOBUCKS

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 24186
  • Reputation: +1812/-339
  • All in all, not bad, not bad at all
Re: Why not a national maximum wage?
« Reply #3 on: September 21, 2008, 01:02:24 PM »
This thread is a really good illustration of DUmmy motivation. Of course a few DUmmies are truly evil traitorous scum. But I believe the vast majority of non-moles, while clearly contemptible, are far, far too stupid to be effectively evil or traitorous. For them, what they think is a political philosophy is simply blind, stupid envy. They are no more capable of embracing a philosophy than is an ant, carrying the wing of a dismembered fly down its tunnel. Their "politics" is to hate anything good or happy, because they instinctively know they will never be either.
Logged

Offline djones520

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4207
  • Reputation: +181/-146
Re: Why not a national maximum wage?
« Reply #4 on: September 21, 2008, 01:05:27 PM »
Nope...  no communists over there...   :whatever:
Logged
"Chuck Norris once had sex in an 18 wheeler. Some of his semen dripped onto the engine. We now call that truck Optimus Prime."

Offline ScubaGuy

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1199
  • Reputation: +91/-4
Re: Why not a national maximum wage?
« Reply #5 on: September 21, 2008, 01:10:16 PM »
Quote from: Chris on September 21, 2008, 12:32:35 PM
I'd love to see the brain trusts over there get together and come up with a workable definition of "rich".  The top tax rate starts at $300,000 a year.  So, there's no difference between some Hollywood liberal who gets $20 million for a single movie and the small-business owner who works 90 hours a week and claims his entire business earnings on his 1040A. 

That's easy.  The DUmmie definition of rich is anyone who make more that I do.

DUmmie tax table.

Me - -100%
Everyone who makes more than me +100%

Logged
25 years ago we had Ronald Reagan, Johnny Cash and Bob Hope.  Now we have Obama, no hope and no cash.

Offline DarkHalo

  • Wannabe Photographer
  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 532
  • Reputation: +40/-18
  • Yes, everything you heard about me is true
Re: Why not a national maximum wage?
« Reply #6 on: September 21, 2008, 01:59:16 PM »
These yutzes are so far from understanding the whole concept of 'incentive' they will just never get it. DUmmie economics, yeah, that sums it up perfectly. 

Yet every one of them thinks they should be the one making the rules for everyone else...that of course wont apply to them.


Logged
"People sleep peaceably in their beds at night only because rough men stand ready to do violence on their behalf" - George Orwell

Offline MrsSmith

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5977
  • Reputation: +466/-54
Re: Why not a national maximum wage?
« Reply #7 on: September 21, 2008, 03:05:08 PM »
To a conservative, a higher wage is an incentive to work harder.

To a liberal, a higher wage means the wage earners in that category are judged as better than himself, so must be brought back to their correct final wage...which is just under his wage.  Otherwise, it's not "fair."  :bawl: :bawl: :bawl:
Logged
.
.

Antifa - the only fascists in America today.
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »