Author Topic: DUmmies outraged that newspapers won't endorse "a candidate" for POTUS  (Read 3615 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline BannedFromDU

  • Gyro Member
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6705
  • Reputation: +1985/-167
  • LITERALLY HITLER
Quote
NewHendoLib (60,407 posts) Fri Oct 25, 2024, 02:04 PM

With the failure of 2 major newspapers to make a presidential

endorsement, we are now sadly receiving confirmation of what many of us realize. We don't have a free and fair media. We have a media that plays to the whim and wealth of its owners. We have a media of cowardice and fear.

Is anyone here surprised?


The LA Times and WAPO failed to bootclick for Kamala (who knows why) and the DUmmies cry.



Taste the rainbow:

Quote

Klarkashton (1,515 posts)
9. Remember how Pravda was a big joke at one time?
Reply to NewHendoLib (Original post)
Fri Oct 25, 2024, 02:10 PM

Here we are.

So what we say or it's propaganda. Yeah.

Quote

maxrandb (15,806 posts)
17. This is fascism without even voting for it
Reply to NewHendoLib (Original post)
Fri Oct 25, 2024, 02:15 PM

My belief is that Vice President Harris will win this election.

My hope is that we then do something about this fascist shit.

It's pretty simple...

Nothing will change! The racism, fascism, misogyny, hatred and white supremacy...NONE OF IT...will change, unless and until we make racism, fascism, misogyny, hatred and white supremacy UNPROFITABLE to the businesses, corporations and individuals that fund and enable it.

They can feel the loss coming...
This signature is intended to remind you that we are on conquered land.

Offline Texacon

  • Super
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13023
  • Reputation: +1662/-55
  • All The Way!
Re: DUmmies outraged that newspapers won't endorse "a candidate" for POTUS
« Reply #1 on: October 25, 2024, 02:36:02 PM »
Two newspapers and the Teamsters.

The Teamsters didn’t endorse because their membership overwhelmingly supports Trump. Maybe the DUmmies should be thankful instead of mad. These papers may have members who are supporting Hitler.

 :rotf:

KC
  Build a man a fire and he'll be warm for a day.  Set a man on fire and he will be warm for the rest of his life.

*Stolen

Offline ADsOutburst

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5188
  • Reputation: +1585/-13
Re: DUmmies outraged that newspapers won't endorse "a candidate" for POTUS
« Reply #2 on: October 25, 2024, 02:37:55 PM »
Quote
We don't have a free and fair media.

No kidding. Some of us have known this for years.

Offline zeitgeist

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6232
  • Reputation: +423/-44
Re: DUmmies outraged that newspapers won't endorse "a candidate" for POTUS
« Reply #3 on: October 25, 2024, 02:39:58 PM »
Yup.  There is no joy in Kammyville, Biden took her out. :rotf:   My favorite is the NY Post cover:

https://nypost.com/2024/10/25/opinion/the-post-endorses-donald-trump-for-president-the-clear-choice-for-a-better-future/

NY Dummy heads will be 'splodin on the trains  :yahoo: :yahoo:
< watch this space for coming distractions >

Offline Karin

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17749
  • Reputation: +1891/-81
Re: DUmmies outraged that newspapers won't endorse "a candidate" for POTUS
« Reply #4 on: October 25, 2024, 03:50:03 PM »
Quote
Coventina (27,789 posts)
5. Well, there goes my Prime subscription.

**** you, Bezos!!!

We need to tax these ****ers out of existence!!!!!

Might there be a clue found in this post? 

Offline Texacon

  • Super
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13023
  • Reputation: +1662/-55
  • All The Way!
Re: DUmmies outraged that newspapers won't endorse "a candidate" for POTUS
« Reply #5 on: October 25, 2024, 04:34:01 PM »
Might there be a clue found in this post?


Holy crap!!  Tax them out of existence because they didn’t endorse a candidate for President?

These people shouldn’t be in charge of a playground.

KC
  Build a man a fire and he'll be warm for a day.  Set a man on fire and he will be warm for the rest of his life.

*Stolen

Offline USA4ME

  • Evil Capitalist
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 14835
  • Reputation: +2476/-76
Re: DUmmies outraged that newspapers won't endorse "a candidate" for POTUS
« Reply #6 on: October 25, 2024, 05:00:06 PM »
Who votes for president based upon the endorsement of a newspaper? I bet if you asked the DUers, even they wouldn’t admit they do that. This hurt their pride. No doubt they’ll blame it on the owners or corporations, all of whom are in the back pocket of Harris and the Democrat party.

.
Because third world peasant labor is a good thing.

Offline BannedFromDU

  • Gyro Member
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6705
  • Reputation: +1985/-167
  • LITERALLY HITLER
Re: DUmmies outraged that newspapers won't endorse "a candidate" for POTUS
« Reply #7 on: October 25, 2024, 05:10:52 PM »
Who votes for president based upon the endorsement of a newspaper? I bet if you asked the DUers, even they wouldn’t admit they do that. This hurt their pride. No doubt they’ll blame it on the owners or corporations, all of whom are in the back pocket of Harris and the Democrat party.

.


     I suspect that a lot of DUmmies don't vote at all - all they want is for people to like who they like. Yes, they are that weak and stupid.
This signature is intended to remind you that we are on conquered land.

Offline Texacon

  • Super
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13023
  • Reputation: +1662/-55
  • All The Way!
Re: DUmmies outraged that newspapers won't endorse "a candidate" for POTUS
« Reply #8 on: October 25, 2024, 05:22:23 PM »

     I suspect that a lot of DUmmies don't vote at all - all they want is for people to like who they like. Yes, they are that weak and stupid.

Yup!!

KC
  Build a man a fire and he'll be warm for a day.  Set a man on fire and he will be warm for the rest of his life.

*Stolen

Offline Ralph Wiggum

  • It's unpossible that I'm a
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 19448
  • Reputation: +2534/-49
Re: DUmmies outraged that newspapers won't endorse "a candidate" for POTUS
« Reply #9 on: October 25, 2024, 06:21:23 PM »
Who votes for president based upon the endorsement of a newspaper? I bet if you asked the DUers, even they wouldn’t admit they do that. This hurt their pride. No doubt they’ll blame it on the owners or corporations, all of whom are in the back pocket of Harris and the Democrat party.

.


Amen. I've often wondered what the purpose of endorsements even serve, whether it be a newspaper or a celebrit-ard.
Voted hottest "chick" at CU - My hotness transcends gender


Offline SVPete

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 29247
  • Reputation: +3207/-248
Re: DUmmies outraged that newspapers won't endorse "a candidate" for POTUS
« Reply #10 on: October 25, 2024, 06:40:35 PM »
The LAT and WashPost stopped clapping, and DU-grade Progs are outraged by their own impotence, their inability to force the LAT and WashPost to conform.
If The Vaccine is deadly as anti-Covid-vaxxers claim, millions now living would have died.

Offline DUmpDiver

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1916
  • Reputation: +850/-5
Re: DUmmies outraged that newspapers won't endorse "a candidate" for POTUS
« Reply #11 on: October 25, 2024, 08:27:18 PM »
Think about it. If all media were actually free, fair and unbiased then they would not endorse anyone ever. They'd just report facts and let voters decide for themselves.

Offline Ptarmigan

  • Bunny Slayer
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 24088
  • Reputation: +1010/-226
  • God Hates Bunnies
Re: DUmmies outraged that newspapers won't endorse "a candidate" for POTUS
« Reply #12 on: October 25, 2024, 09:09:24 PM »
I rather have news media not endorse anyone. They should stick to reporting news. Nothing more.
Never interrupt your enemy when he is making a mistake.
-Napoleon Bonaparte

Allow enemies their space to hate; they will destroy themselves in the process.
-Lisa Du

Offline CollectivismMustDie

  • American
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4054
  • Reputation: +1584/-42
  • (D)Ummie nightmare.
Re: DUmmies outraged that newspapers won't endorse "a candidate" for POTUS
« Reply #13 on: October 26, 2024, 01:33:17 AM »

Holy crap!!  Tax them out of existence because they didn’t endorse a candidate for President?

These people shouldn’t be in charge of a playground.

KC


Particularly since so many of them are required to stay 500 feet or more away from them...
"Be not intimidated... nor suffer yourselves to be wheedled out of your liberties by any pretense of politeness, delicacy, or decency. These, as they are often used, are but three different names for hypocrisy, chicanery and cowardice." - John Adams

Hillary Clinton will never be the President of the United States.

Offline BamaMoose

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 993
  • Reputation: +521/-5
Re: DUmmies outraged that newspapers won't endorse "a candidate" for POTUS
« Reply #14 on: October 26, 2024, 04:32:52 AM »
Think about it. If all media were actually free, fair and unbiased then they would not endorse anyone ever. They'd just report facts and let voters decide for themselves.

Exactly correct.  The DUmmies go on and on about the Fairness Doctrine (without having a clue what it actually was), but the minute a news outlet reports in a non-partisan manner they have a fit.  They are so used to the MSM slanting favorably towards the Dems that they can't even consider the concept of the media being neutral and just reporting facts.

Offline Movie buff- The Sequel

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1653
  • Reputation: +290/-12
Re: DUmmies outraged that newspapers won't endorse "a candidate" for POTUS
« Reply #15 on: October 26, 2024, 05:05:09 AM »
Two newspapers and the Teamsters.

The Teamsters didn’t endorse because their membership overwhelmingly supports Trump.
The Democrats lost a good deal of the union vote in general back during the Obama administration; His attempts to destroy the coal- mining industry angered them due to the effect it had on union miners, especially since the coal- miners' union is one of the oldest and most respected labor unions in the country.

Offline Old n Grumpy

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9590
  • Reputation: +2116/-13
Re: DUmmies outraged that newspapers won't endorse "a candidate" for POTUS
« Reply #16 on: October 26, 2024, 06:01:15 AM »
The Democrats lost a good deal of the union vote in general back during the Obama administration; His attempts to destroy the coal- mining industry angered them due to the effect it had on union miners, especially since the coal- miners' union is one of the oldest and most respected labor unions in the country.

And when biden shut down the pipeline and border wall there were a lot of union jobs lost as well.
Life is tough and it’s even tougher when you’re stupid

Basking in the glow of my white Privilege and toxic masculinity while I water the Begonias with liberal tears!

I will give up my guns when the liberals give up their illegal aliens

We need a Bull Shit tax to make the Democrats go broke!

Offline 67 Rover

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6453
  • Reputation: +1699/-41
Re: DUmmies outraged that newspapers won't endorse "a candidate" for POTUS
« Reply #17 on: October 26, 2024, 07:17:11 AM »
The LAT and WashPost stopped clapping, and DU-grade Progs are outraged by their own impotence, their inability to force the LAT and WashPost to conform.

What they are failing to grasp is just how bad of a candidate do you have to be to not automatically get the endorsement of the LAT and WashPost just by being the democrat in a Presidential election.  :o
NRA Benefactor member
G.O.A. Life member
G.O.A.L. Life member
Certified Law Enforcement Sig Armorer

Offline Old n Grumpy

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9590
  • Reputation: +2116/-13
Re: DUmmies outraged that newspapers won't endorse "a candidate" for POTUS
« Reply #18 on: October 26, 2024, 09:28:38 AM »
I don’t know why they are upset, just because the company has endorsed someone it doesn’t mean the employees agree and will vote for that candidate. :thatsright:
Life is tough and it’s even tougher when you’re stupid

Basking in the glow of my white Privilege and toxic masculinity while I water the Begonias with liberal tears!

I will give up my guns when the liberals give up their illegal aliens

We need a Bull Shit tax to make the Democrats go broke!

Offline SVPete

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 29247
  • Reputation: +3207/-248
Re: DUmmies outraged that newspapers won't endorse "a candidate" for POTUS
« Reply #19 on: October 26, 2024, 10:15:27 AM »
LAT and WashPost editorial staff are in howling poutrage over their papers' owners' decision. :rotf: Maybe, just maybe, Bezos and the owner of the PAT recognize that going full Hitlerization on Trump has existentially hurt the skewspapers for which they paid gobs of $$$$.
If The Vaccine is deadly as anti-Covid-vaxxers claim, millions now living would have died.

Offline enslaved1

  • If you choke a Smurf, what color does it turn?
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2128
  • Reputation: +781/-4
Re: DUmmies outraged that newspapers won't endorse "a candidate" for POTUS
« Reply #20 on: October 28, 2024, 09:39:09 AM »
I rather have news media not endorse anyone. They should stick to reporting news. Nothing more.

I'm with you and DUmp Diver.  Newspapers should be reporting facts, not trying to sway opinions.  Not that it's every really been that way, as much as we want to pretend, but there used to be some real journalists and even editors who at least tried to disguise their agendas and preferences.  Long before most of our lifetimes, but they did exist here and there. 
Romans 6:17-18 But thanks be to God, that you who were once slaves of sin have become obedient from the heart to the standard of teaching to which you were committed, and, having been set free from sin, have become slaves of righteousness.

Offline SVPete

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 29247
  • Reputation: +3207/-248
Re: DUmmies outraged that newspapers won't endorse "a candidate" for POTUS
« Reply #21 on: October 28, 2024, 10:57:01 AM »
I rather have news media not endorse anyone. They should stick to reporting news. Nothing more.

Skewspapers started leaving the neighborhood where editorial commentary was mostly kept on the editorial page(s) some time in the late 1960s. We now have a generation of "reporters" who have no memory of that division.
If The Vaccine is deadly as anti-Covid-vaxxers claim, millions now living would have died.