They want it both ways when it comes to freedom/guns

[CC27]

EnergizedLib (1,340 posts)


They want it both ways when it comes to freedom/guns

We’re told the Second Amendment is needed as a check on a tyrannical government (like they could actually take government down anyway), but who are their two leading contenders for 2024?

The worst occupant to ever sit in the Oval Office whose lies and rhetoric inspired an insurrection to try to overturn democracy.

The younger version of him who bans books, targets the marginalized, wants to register bloggers about him while also concealing his travel records.

They’re talking out of both sides of their mouths. Make it make sense. That’s because hardly anything they say or do ever does make sense.

https://www.democraticunderground.com/100217767120

I notice a hint of projection.

[67 Rover]

Quote
EnergizedLib (1,340 posts)


They want it both ways when it comes to freedom/guns

We’re told the Second Amendment is needed as a check on a tyrannical government (like they could actually take government down anyway), but who are their two leading contenders for 2024?

The worst occupant to ever sit in the Oval Office whose lies and rhetoric inspired an insurrection to try to overturn democracy.

 

Which is it?

[enslaved1]

Which is it?

Doublethink is a moonbat's primary language, so it's both.  Right after saying the ebil reichwing (assuming that's who "they" is) wants things both ways. 

It has to be hard work staying so far removed from reality and self awareness.   

[ADsOutburst]

I'm a lot more worried about the people who suppress speech, don't a liquid shit if you're deprived of legal rights, and think the Bill of Right is basically just a list suggestions than I am about a guy who removes books from public school curricula (or what the dems call "banning books").