Author Topic: CR would slash EPA, White House energy office  (Read 2124 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Janice

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1446
  • Reputation: +169/-101
  • This election is about paychecks v. food stamps
CR would slash EPA, White House energy office
« on: February 11, 2011, 09:52:08 PM »
CR would slash EPA, White House energy office

House Republicans threw down the gauntlet at the Obama administration's energy and environmental agenda Friday night, proposing to defund the White House energy adviser's office and block EPA from regulating greenhouse gas emissions.

In addition to slashing the Environmental Protection Agency’s budget by $3 billion – nearly twice as much as they originally proposed – GOP lawmakers included language in the continuing resolution to strip the agency of its ability to implement climate change rules.

And despite the fact that Obama's energy and climate adviser Carol Browner is leaving the administration, the bill would defund the post of "Assistant to the President for Energy and Climate Change, or any substantially similar position." The White House has not said if it will replace Browner or dissolve the office, which was created for her in 2009. >>>

Meanwhile, the EPA's bank accounts would take a big hit under the CR. The bill proposes $3 billion in cuts, including a $107 million hit for climate change programs – 29 percent less than the 2010 enacted level. The Interior Department also took a massive hit – the Republican draft would cut the agency budget by $1.4 billion. Specifically, the CR goes after the department’s “wildlands” policy, the Obama administration’s signature initiative for public lands.

---------------------------------

This is greaat news! Way to go tea party freshmen!

The marxists and the commies are going to be gnashing their teeth over this one ... starting in the White House.
Reagan bankrupted the Soviet Empire ...

Obama is bankrupting the American Republic

Offline diesel driver

  • Creepy Ass Cracker and Smart-Ass White Boy!
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9130
  • Reputation: +609/-55
  • Enhancing My Carbon Footprint!
Re: CR would slash EPA, White House energy office
« Reply #1 on: February 12, 2011, 04:06:24 AM »
CR would slash EPA, White House energy office

House Republicans threw down the gauntlet at the Obama administration's energy and environmental agenda Friday night, proposing to defund the White House energy adviser's office and block EPA from regulating greenhouse gas emissions.

In addition to slashing the Environmental Protection Agency’s budget by $3 billion – nearly twice as much as they originally proposed – GOP lawmakers included language in the continuing resolution to strip the agency of its ability to implement climate change rules.

And despite the fact that Obama's energy and climate adviser Carol Browner is leaving the administration, the bill would defund the post of "Assistant to the President for Energy and Climate Change, or any substantially similar position." The White House has not said if it will replace Browner or dissolve the office, which was created for her in 2009. >>>

Meanwhile, the EPA's bank accounts would take a big hit under the CR. The bill proposes $3 billion in cuts, including a $107 million hit for climate change programs – 29 percent less than the 2010 enacted level. The Interior Department also took a massive hit – the Republican draft would cut the agency budget by $1.4 billion. Specifically, the CR goes after the department’s “wildlands” policy, the Obama administration’s signature initiative for public lands.

---------------------------------

This is greaat news! Way to go tea party freshmen!

The marxists and the commies are going to be gnashing their teeth over this one ... starting in the White House.


This should be GOOD!

It's about time the EPA (Eternal Pain in the ASS) got defunded.   :yahoo:   :II:
Murphy's 3rd Law:  "You can't make anything 'idiot DUmmie proof'.  The world will just create a better idiot DUmmie."

Liberals are like Slinkys.  Basically useless, but they do bring a smile to your face when you push them down a flight of stairs...
 
Global warming supporters believe that a few hundred million tons of CO2 has more control over our climate than a million mile in diameter, unshielded thermo-nuclear fusion reactor at the middle of the solar system.

"A dead enemy is a peaceful enemy.  Blessed be the peacemakers". - U.S. Marine Corp

You can't fix stupid, but you can vote it out of office.

Offline compaqxp

  • The Canadian
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1449
  • Reputation: +743/-808
Re: CR would slash EPA, White House energy office
« Reply #2 on: February 13, 2011, 10:44:48 PM »
This should be GOOD!

It's about time the EPA (Eternal Pain in the ASS) got defunded.   :yahoo:   :II:

I agree, the EPA is a pain for everyone.

Offline Thor

  • General Ne'er Do Well, Troublemaker & All Around Meanie!!
  • In Memoriam
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13103
  • Reputation: +363/-297
  • Native Texan & US Navy (ret)
Re: CR would slash EPA, White House energy office
« Reply #3 on: February 14, 2011, 03:30:48 AM »
No Governmental Agency should be able to make laws without Congressional approval. I WISH that they'd defund a few other agencies and have it to apply to a few other Governmental agencies. The BATF immediately comes to mind.
"The state must declare the child to be the most precious treasure of the people. As long as the government is perceived as working for the benefit of the children, the people will happily endure almost any curtailment of liberty and almost any deprivation."- IBID

I AM your General Ne'er Do Well, Troublemaker & All Around Meanie!!

"Congress has not unlimited powers to provide for the general welfare, but only those specifically enumerated."-Thomas Jefferson

Offline SSG Snuggle Bunny

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 23558
  • Reputation: +2480/-270
  • Voted Rookie-of-the-Year, 3 years running
Re: CR would slash EPA, White House energy office
« Reply #4 on: February 14, 2011, 07:27:34 AM »
Quote
...a $107 million hit for climate change programs – 29 percent less than the 2010 enacted level...

A dubious number. How much was their budget increased under Pelosi's tenure?
According to the Bible, "know" means "yes."