The 1/6 Committee Is Planning To Write A Jaw Dropping Report

[dutch508]

Star Member applegrove (105,623 posts)


The 1/6 Committee Is Planning To Write A Jaw Dropping Report
BY JASON EASLEY at PoliticusUSA

The 1/6 Committee Is Planning To Write A Jaw Dropping Report

https://www.politicususa.com/2022/03/19/the-1-6-committee-is-planning-to-write-a-jaw-dropping-report.html

"SNIP......

The 1/6 Committee isn’t planning on a dry report written by staffers. They want to issue a gripping report that tells the story of the Capitol attack.

The Washington Post reported:

It’s unclear whether the committee will succeed in bringing on a high-profile journalist or if the committee has finalized a choice to author the report. But the committee’s leaders are keenly aware of the difficulty in breaking through to hard-to-reach audiences, according to staffers and members involved in the process.

“We do not want a bureaucrat to write this report but rather a historian or a journalist — or someone who writes and can tell a story in a compelling way so that people can actually understand what happened,” said Rep. Stephanie Murphy (D-Fla.), a member of the committee.

Two people with knowledge of the report say the committee wants it to include gripping testimony and quotes, along with starring roles for key players in the events leading up to and on Jan. 6, 2021.

The Committee isn’t going to release some boring report full of jargon and terminology written by staffers who in most cases aren’t writers. The 1/6 Committee understands that the best way to make the very complicated plot surrounding Trump’s effort to overturn an election understandable is to present it as a story.

.....SNIP"

let me paraphrase...

We're not telling the truth, we're telling a made up story full of adventure and excitement~!!!!!

 

Star Member Hoyt (52,647 posts)

3. Better write a very specific, easy to grasp, report with hard evidence

if they want to get trump.

Star Member Ocelot II (98,985 posts)

7. I hope they don't let the lawyers write it. They should vet it for accuracy, but

a good journalist, preferably one without obvious partisan leanings that can be attacked, should do the actual writing.

Star Member Ocelot II (98,985 posts)

8. I'd love to see a graphic novel of it.

And I hope someday some outfit like Netflix does a series. It's too complicated for a movie.

Star Member dixiechiken1 (1,484 posts)

12. I thought they were going to have public hearings???

helpisontheway (4,731 posts)

13. Probably does not matter because Garland will not allow Trump to be prosecuted

Just as the people in NY are protecting him. I think he will get off for those phone calls to GA too. He is like Teflon..nothing sticks to that crook.

 

[SVPete]

Facts are "dry" and "boring", accurate in use of terms that demagogues denigrate as "jargon".

Fiction is "jaw-dropping", "gripping", and "compelling".

[BannedFromDU]

     Last thing DUmmies dropped their jaws for was when Slick Willie unexpectedly showed up at a DU Meetup in 2003.

[Old n Grumpy]

The 1/6 Committee Is Planning To Write A Jaw Dropping Report

It was all aa nothing burger, a HOAX just like the Russian collusion.

[Tess Anderson]

A jaw dropping report, Wendy? Look, I know you're just another Canadian dummy but this committee is a sham and everybody knows it:

https://www.judicialwatch.org/pelosi-congress-claims-immunity-in-court/

bet she doesn't release that

[FlaGator]

I remember when reports like this were called fiction.

[dandi]

In other words, they don't want a report, they want a dramatization. And like all dramatizations, facts and context are sacrificed in favor of entertainment.

This is why I  can't cut Cheney or Kinzinger any slack for participating in this farce, despite their wrapping themselves in the flag of "truth." They knew damn well the Dims were going to turn it into a grandstanding political sideshow and proceeded anyway, enabling their bullshit.

[Drafe Hoblin]

The Trump Rallies are developing a Jaws-soundtrack atmosphere at a faster clip.

 

[CollectivismMustDie]

a good journalist, preferably one without obvious partisan leanings

Hahahahahahahahaha.

First, good luck finding one.

Second, even if one turned up, the minute they tried to be even handed you and your scumbag lefty friends would be screaming that the 'journalist' is a far righty - because he isn't a far lefty.

Silly DUmmy.

[SVPete]

a good journalist, preferably one without obvious partisan leanings

Hahahahahahahahaha.

First, good luck finding one.

Second, even if one turned up, the minute they tried to be even handed you and your scumbag lefty friends would be screaming that the 'journalist' is a far righty - because he isn't a far lefty.

Silly DUmmy.

  Yeah, those that keep their partisanship out of their reportage are rare and exiled or ostracized.  It's telling, though, that Star Member Ocelot II would make a point of this. It's an acknowledgement that MSM-folks are mostly openly partisan.

It'd be a Fox News people, etc., need not apply job, though they probably aren't stupid enough to apply. I wonder, though, how many MSM-folk who aren't Reid-MadCow-Lemon grade crazy would sacrifice whatever smokescreen of non-partisanship they have left to produce such a hyper-partisan fiction that it would be shredded within 24 clock hours.

Documentary and history works don't get hyped build-up and advance publicity. The WashPost is evidencing that this "report" will be a highly fictional piece of partisanship.

[ADsOutburst]

So... they're goin to continue using the exact same strategy they've been using? Continue the 1/6 narrative. No, like, really drive it home this time!

[SVPete]

So... they're goin to continue using the exact same strategy they've been using? Continue the 1/6 narrative. No, like, really drive it home this time!

DUpipo are committed to the idea that failure to communicate their message is their problem, not the message itself.

[Ralph Wiggum]

In other words, they don't want a report, they want a dramatization. And like all dramatizations, facts and context are sacrificed in favor of entertainment.

This is why I  can't cut Cheney or Kinzinger any slack for participating in this farce, despite their wrapping themselves in the flag of "truth." They knew damn well the Dims were going to turn it into a grandstanding political sideshow and proceeded anyway, enabling their bullshit.

They want it to be an Aaron Sorkin "The West Wing" melodrama.

[CollectivismMustDie]

Hahahahahahahahaha.

First, good luck finding one.

Second, even if one turned up, the minute they tried to be even handed you and your scumbag lefty friends would be screaming that the 'journalist' is a far righty - because he isn't a far lefty.

Silly DUmmy.


  Yeah, those that keep their partisanship out of their reportage are rare and exiled or ostracized.  It's telling, though, that Star Member Ocelot II would make a point of this. It's an acknowledgement that MSM-folks are mostly openly partisan.

It'd be a Fox News people, etc., need not apply job, though they probably aren't stupid enough to apply. I wonder, though, how many MSM-folk who aren't Reid-MadCow-Lemon grade crazy would sacrifice whatever smokescreen of non-partisanship they have left to produce such a hyper-partisan fiction that it would be shredded within 24 clock hours.

Documentary and history works don't get hyped build-up and advance publicity. The WashPost is evidencing that this "report" will be a highly fictional piece of partisanship.

Exactly!

They (DUers and dem pols alike) want a non-partisan author just like they (DUers and dem pols alike) wanted  non-partisan j6 members.

 

[freedumb2003b]

By the time the report drops and any action can be taken the adults will be back in charge and 1/6 will just be a mewling bleat by leftists.

[SVPete]

So, when, between September 15th and October 21st do y'all think this piece of fiction will be published? In October Surprises, timing matters. Has to be early enough to have impact, must be late enough that debunkings do not. An example of bad timing would be Memogate, which SeeBS excreted too early, and the debunkers were more effective than the Rather/Mapes fraud.