I don't own any firearms myself, so I have no dog in this fight, but I still recognize that what the DUmmies are proposing is sheer tyranny, openly discarding people's basic God- given rights in the name of their twisted political goals.
Nothing will flat out STOP (As in, they'll never happen again) mass shootings or gun violence in general, but I think a good way to greatly lessen the number of mass shootings is a kind of mass- education campaign to raise awareness of the warning signs that a person may be at risk of committing a violent act, with an emphasis on the importance of coming forward and notifying the proper authorities if they know of someone demonstrating a lot of these signs. Pair that with greater standards of accountability on law- enforcement personnel to act swiftly and decisively if they receive such warnings from people (That, in particular, would have prevented the Parkland school shooting). The overwhelming majority of the time, these mass shootings are committed by people who were noticeably disturbed for a long time and amply demonstrating such warning signs, their friends and family KNEW they were dangerous, but they didn't do anything until it was too late. Find a way to fix THAT problem, and I guarantee the number of mass shootings WILL plummet.
"LonePirate (9,310 posts)
9. Buy backs and then house to house searches, if necessary."
House to house searches?
1. Please propose this as part of the official platform for the Dems' presidential candidate in 2020, I'm sure the American voters will LOVE it! LOL!
2. Okay, since you've made it clear you're eager to discard the Second Amendment, I guess it's not surprising that you don't hold strongly to the Fourth Amendment (The Amendment which guarantees protection from unreasonable searches of property, and also decrees that warrants for such searches may only be issued if there is probable cause), either.
3. How about house to house searches to check for illegal drugs? Or, to check for child pornography? How would those grab you DUmmies?
"Voting fairness should be added."
Voting fairness? What the hell does that even mean?
"The 1st needs to remain of course, but it does need tweaking. Things like Nazism should be allowed to be banned."
No, just no. I hate Nazism as much as the next guy, but declaring that the espousal of certain belief systems should no longer be protected by the First Amendment, even belief systems that the majority of Americans rightfully abhor, is creating a VERY dangerous precedent/ slippery slope. To put it another way, DUmmies, how about next we declare that the vermin in Antifa should no longer have the right to Freedom of Speech or of the Press on the grounds that they regularly encourage vandalism and violence? Heck, maybe we should declare that you DUmmies no longer have the right to Freedom of Speech or of the Press, on the grounds that some in your numbers have openly encouraged the assassination of President Trump (A few weeks ago, Bigman Pigman openly proposed slipping highly poisonous mushrooms into President Trump's food, and just yesterday, a DUmmy named Haggis for Breakfast said, regarding President Trump saying things that offend people, "What we need is a patriotic sniper") and other prominent conservatives?
The price of living in a free society is that those freedoms extend even to people whose views you find completely abhorrent. I'd take that kind of society over one in which the government gets to decide who has the right to Free Speech and who doesn't any day of the week.