Send Us Hatemail ! mailbag@conservativecave.com
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
shockey80 (483 posts) https://www.democraticunderground.com/10029765080It's so difficult to find evidence against Trump. For example;Hey Russia, steal clintons e-mails and help me win the election. I fired Comey because he was investigating me. What a relief. Sally Yates warned me Flynn was subject to blackmail by Russia so I fired her. Russia did not attack our elections. Fake news. The June 2016 meeting with russians was about adoption. Believe me. What a freak show this has been. He convicted himself.
Towlie (2,406 posts) 5. Worse, he won't take the advice of the United States Intelligence CommunityWhat higher authority could he possibly appeal to in order to back up his claim that "Russia did not attack our elections."
L. Coyote (43,449 posts) 2. I know. I looked and looked and this is all I could find in a few hours online:Trump's New Impeachable Offenses: Obstruction of Justice, Conspiracy, Abuse of Power Trump is sooo going to be indicted and charged.
louis-t (17,112 posts) 6. Witness tampering.They keep forgetting to mention that.
Star Member FakeNoose (2,636 posts) 7. Trump's lies aren't evidence of crimesYes I agree = he tells nothing but lies. And everything you list is a Trump lie, that's basically how he got elected. Mueller's job is to find evidence of crimes, and as such, the constant lying is not evidence to convict. (For one thing Cheeto's not under oath.) Mueller has been following the money and interviewing people involved with the wrong-doing. Checking out alibis, meeting agendas, and travel schedules. It's a lot of follow-up and hard work. If you've ever watched a police procedural Law & Order type show, you know what I mean. We hear him lying and we think My God this guy is so guilty! But that won't cut it in court. Robert Mueller knows what he's doing.
Towlie 5. Worse, he won't take the advice of the United States Intelligence CommunityWhat higher authority could he possibly appeal to in order to back up his claim that "Russia did not attack our elections."
...there is just so much wrong in the post... it's not worth the effort to try to correct it all...