Movie glorifies the political murder of a family. DI liberals won't condemn it.

[Mr Mannn]

http://www.discussionist.com/1016219587

Da Mannn (11,618 posts)

Democrat class warfare...new movie glorifying the MURDER of the one percent
THEY WANT TO GET VIOLENT. this depicts a guy infected with occupy mentality killing a family, because they are rich. with all the class warfare the Left has been playing..with all the death threats coming out of occupy-eat the rich...is any one surprised that murder is being glorified on movie screens?
[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mdOr2q6Gl8s[/youtube]

Tovera (3,751 posts)
18. The Democratic Party is barely even "left."

It's certainly not socialist (which I, on the other hand, certainly am). The far left has been moving away from that joke of a party for a while now, and the movement gained momentum last year after the corrupt DNC ****ed over Bernie Sanders.

As for class warfare, I think it's not unreasonable to view it as self-defense on the part of working-class people at this point. 35+ years of ever-increasing earning gaps and steadily-increasing monopolization of political power by the oligarch class tends to rile people up. The "1%'ers" (more like .01%...) may well reap what they've sown. I hope it never comes to that (civil wars are in many ways the very worst wars), but I find it hard to condemn the more militant folk on my side for saying enough is enough.

Again, I don't advocate violence and I think a lot of our problems can be solved without it (in large part by breaking up the current union). But if it does come to bloodshed, I'm not going to blame the working class for firing the first shots, if that's how it goes down. It's not unlike a kicked dog finally snapping and taking a bite out of its abuser.

And yeah, I realize this post is going to piss off some of my conservative friends here (friends in part because we share a hobby: shooting). So be it.

kcci (7,074 posts)
11. Different country, different citizenship, different history, different laws, different heritage

different head of state, different head of govt, different flag, different continent, different education systems....
It would be shorter to list the similarities than differences....
They share a better education than you.
They share a better war record than the CSA

Da Mannn (11,618 posts)
13. Well then, Liberals here should have no problem saying this is wrong

kcci (7,074 posts)
17. Thus them doing so throughout this idiotic OP

Glad to see you pay attention

Da Mannn (11,618 posts)
20. Not a single Leftist here condemned the movie

The only one who came close was Tovera, who said both yes and no-he would not blame the 99% who murdered families/fired the first shot.

Tovera (3,751 posts)
26. Please don't misrepresent my statements.

I haven't condemned the movie because I haven't seen the movie...and have no intention of doing so. It doesn't interest me sufficiently to waste my time on it.

And I'm not a "he."

Da Mannn (11,618 posts)
28. How hard is it to say, "Murder is wrong, even if it's a 1% family."

Da Mannn (11,618 posts)
32. KCCI, is it wrong to murder a family?

can you answer that?

kcci (7,074 posts)
33. Did you think Transformers was a documentary?

Movies aren't real.

If you continue being terrified by foreign movies I encourage you to call your mommy, because nobody else gives a **** about your sniveling cowardice.

Da Mannn (11,618 posts)
34. you can't even condemn a call to murder.

pathetic.

this is basic humanity 101. I am amazed at the lengths people will go to avoid a simple question.

Banshee 3 Actual (33,240 posts)
10. Fatwad and digiboob must need sports drinks from the fapping to this

Da Mannn (11,618 posts)
25. As of 10 AM. Not a single Lefty has said, "Murdering Families is wrong."

this is central standard time. the only person on the left to even address the issue was "neither condoning nor endorsing" murder.

(it is now 12:30 my time. no one can condemn a call to murder.)

[BattleHymn]

You'll be as likely to get a leftist that to condemn murdering the one percent as you will a Muzzie condemning  terrorist acts. 



They may not participate in it, but you can be damn sure they're in favor of it by their silence.

[Linda]

You know the left thinks it is OK to murder the 1% just as well as they think it is OK to murder unborn babies.
After all those 1% have more than they do, and we all know that is a major no-no.

Now if you suggest killing the criminal element that actually does murder innocent people, then they get their dandruff up and
and scream like a wounded banshee.

[jukin]

AGAIN, how does anyone think that this ends peacefully other than us going to the camps...and leftists that means we exterminate you.

[Movie buff- The Sequel]

That movie looks hideous (And I'm no cinematic sissy; I am fasting from R- rated films for Lent).
Don't forget, these same DUmmies openly cheered on the film 'Death of a President' about what would happen if Bush was assassinated, and yet viewed any remotely negative portrayal of Obama as an evil abomination.
Tovera has the gall to refer to those kinds of hideous murders as not only justified, but "Self- defense"?
He/ she/ it perfectly embodies why ultra- liberals should have as little influence as possible in our justice system; Their concept of justice is almost as @$$- backwards as those who believe in Sharia Law.

[SVPete]

Has "Us and Them" been nominated for an Academy Award, yet?

[DumbAss Tanker]

Wonder how they'll react to 'Bitter Harvest,' about the Stalin-imposed Ukrainian famine.

[Linda]

They aren't done yet...

http://uproxx.com/tv/last-man-on-earth-trump-dead/

[SVPete]

Wonder how they'll react to 'Bitter Harvest,' about the Stalin-imposed Ukrainian famine.

A very interesting question. Traditionally, the MSM - "news" and entertainment - have denied Stalinist atrocities, even in the face of compelling evidence. OTOH, the Russians are bogey-critters nowadays, so ...

[SVPete]

Just a random straying thought ...

In the 2000s, Hollyweird defied economics and normal people by dumping 10s or 100s of millions of $$ into sure-flop Hate-Bush movies with the WoT as their focus. What will be the focus of Hollyweird's sure-flop Hate-trump movies? Russian election-hacking?

[DumbAss Tanker]

Just a random straying thought ...

In the 2000s, Hollyweird defied economics and normal people by dumping 10s or 100s of million of $$ into sure-flop Hate-Bush movies with the WoT as their focus. What will be the focus of Hollyweird's sure-flop Hate-trump movies?

I'm sure they'll be fielding plenty of their staple 'Evil corporate billionaire fatcat conspiracy to take over the government foiled by Populist man of action and courageous but quirky young female reporter' genre, it's a perennial favorite theme with them.

[BlueStateSaint]

A very interesting question. Traditionally, the MSM - "news" and entertainment - have denied Stalinist atrocities, even in the face of compelling evidence. OTOH, the Russians are bogey-critters nowadays, so ...

Here's an interesting theory for y'all.  My wife was commenting that the timing of the release of the movie was "interesting."  My reply was that the release date was probably scheduled for this time frame sometime at the beginning of 2016, with the premise that HilLIARy would win the election, and she would be building the case for war with Russia.  When the witch lost, they had no 'Plan B,' so they released it anyway.

Can anyone see this line of thought?

[DumbAss Tanker]

Here's an interesting theory for y'all.  My wife was commenting that the timing of the release of the movie was "interesting."  My reply was that the release date was probably scheduled for this time frame sometime at the beginning of 2016, with the premise that HilLIARy would win the election, and she would be building the case for war with Russia.  When the witch lost, they had no 'Plan B,' so they released it anyway.

Can anyone see this line of thought?

It's a reasonable hypothesis, but with the protracted Russian antics in Ukraine, and with their massive manpower and material support to their puppet Don Republic state, it's also possible that it was topical enough that it was coming anyway.  Of course I've only seen the trailer once so far, I don't know how damning the film will actually turn out to be, but it would have to be X-rated to fully portray the horrors that transpired.  Nobody who's ever seen the survivor interviews could possibly buy the politically-acceptable death numbers historians toss around to minimize it.