Stringent PA Laws That Protect Democrat Voter Fraud May Stop Hillary from Steali

[HAPPY2BME]

 Jim Hoft Nov 29th, 2016 6:55 am

Stringent PA Laws That Protect Democrat Voter Fraud May Stop Hillary from Stealing US Election

The problem with Pennsylvania’s recount process though for Stein and Clinton is that according to state law three voters in each precinct or election district in Pennsylvania must submit a notarized affidavit to the clerk in their individual election districts in order to initiate a recount.  There are 9,163 precincts in Pennsylvania.  As of noon Monday,

   "the Philadelphia city Board of Elections had received petitions for 35 of the 1,686 voting divisions in Philadelphia, according to City Commissioner Al Schmidt. By 5:30 p.m., that number was 74— about 4 percent of the city’s total divisions."

    Stein needed more than 5,000 people in Philadelphia alone to sign petitions to file for a recount and would have had to mobilize about 30,000 people statewide to get a full recount going in Pennsylvania.

The laws in Pennsylvania are so stringent that it makes it nearly impossible to have a recount in the state.  Unfortunately for Republicans there have been numerous mentions of fraud over the years in the city of Philadelphia alone.  For example in 2012, in 59 voting divisions in the city, Mitt Romney received not one vote.

The Pennsylvania laws prevent a recount in areas like Philadelphia where there is good reason to suspect Democrat fraud. This year these same stringent laws may prevent Hillary from stealing the US election.

http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2016/11/stringent-laws-may-prevent-hillary-recount-in-pennsylvania-from-stealing-us-election/

[BlueStateSaint]

Another, unlikely, application of The Law of Unintended Consequences.

[Gretchen]

Democrats thought they would fix it so they could steal all elections. I think a recount would uncover Dem voter fraud and Trump's numbers would be even higher.