« previous next »
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: PHDD: Why I think the vote count is more or less accurate  (Read 1256 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline fatboy

  • Does this gun make me look fat?
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2436
  • Reputation: +621/-54
  • skinnier than the average primitive
PHDD: Why I think the vote count is more or less accurate
« on: November 25, 2016, 02:01:09 AM »
One of the Four Horsewomen of the Femapocalypse set off a smoldering campfire....

Quote
Fri Nov 25, 2016, 01:31 AM

Star Member BainsBane (38,059 posts)

Why I think the vote count is more or less accurate
 
 
 Minnesota. Trump came within 1.5 points of winning Minnesota. Minnesota hasn't gone Republican since Nixon was reelected, but it came close this time. http://www.politico.com/2016-election/results/map/president/minnesota/

Our Governor and Secretary of State are Democrats. We had no voter repression. In fact, the state made it easier to vote by opening up early voting locations and no-excuse absentee voting. We also have same-day voter registration. I trust the count in my state. For Minnesota to come so close to going for Trump, there had to be a pro-Trump effect across the country.

I don't think the recount will alter the outcome. Remember, Clinton has to win all three states (WI, MI, and PA) to overturn Trump. I think the Dems aren't asking for recounts because they don't think it will alter the outcome.

I would like nothing more than to be wrong, but I have to think logically about this so as not to get my hopes up.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/12512625067


Quote
Response to LisaL (Reply #1)

Fri Nov 25, 2016, 01:36 AM

Star Member BainsBane (38,059 posts)

2. He did better than anticipated
 
and well enough to win the electoral college. That's what I meant.

Quote
Response to BainsBane (Original post)

Fri Nov 25, 2016, 02:08 AM

Star Member msongs (42,226 posts)

6. likely voter suppression was way more effective than any actual cheating issues. nt

Quote
Response to BainsBane (Original post)

Fri Nov 25, 2016, 02:21 AM

Star Member ucrdem (10,697 posts)

9. Here's why I disagree:
 
Michigan - More African-American voters than MN, and many thousands of ballots reported with no presidential vote from Detroit;
Wisconsin - 85% voter turnout and other anomalies in the county reports;
Pennsylvania - Anomalous R wins in Luzerne and similar counties.

So if the recounts go forward I'm prepared to be disappointed but I'd say the odds of waking up and finding out that Hillary is going be inaugurated are about 50-50

There are not going to be any recounts you retard.

Quote
Response to BainsBane (Reply #10)

Fri Nov 25, 2016, 02:29 AM

Star Member ucrdem (10,697 posts)

11. PA won't be easy but if the other two are reversed
 
all bets are off and I would not rule out a revote. Don't forget that the designated perp is Russia which will make extraordinary measures acceptable, also that the Supreme Court is likely to be invoked at some point and if Kennedy sides with the recount she wins.

Another retard. Everywhere I look.... retards.

 
 
 

Logged
"We will bring back our jobs. We will bring back our borders. We will bring back our wealth - and we will bring back our dreams!" -President Donald J. Trump 1/20/17

Offline Patriot Guard Rider

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2651
  • Reputation: +650/-18
  • Yes, really. Liberals DO disgust me.
Re: PHDD: Why I think the vote count is more or less accurate
« Reply #1 on: November 25, 2016, 05:41:15 AM »
They set themselves up for disappointment.

Hopes of a recount
Hopes of a redo of the election
Hopes of intimidating electoral college members
Hopes of the DNC doing something.

When nothing comes through, they fall further and further into despair.

I only wish that site had been up on election night. The responses as one state after another fell to Trump would have made me stand up and give myself a high five. But $kimmer, with his wifes ties to the DNC, knew the exit polling and knew Pickles Von Cankles was going to lose. He turned the site off and blamed a hacker, all so the place wouldn't absolutely explode election night.
Logged
Liberals disgust me. (Now I don't have to remember to put it on each post).

Because only the left goes searching for that which is not there in a desperate attempt to be offended about something.

"If ye love wealth better than liberty, the tranquility of servitude better than the animating contest of freedom, go home from us in peace. We ask not your counsels or your arms. Crouch down and lick the hands which feed you. May your chains set lightly upon you, and may posterity forget that you were our countrymen." - Samuel Adams

Many people do not see evil until the gas is flowing into the chamber. That is why they get on the trains in the first place.

Offline DumbAss Tanker

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 28493
  • Reputation: +1710/-151
Re: PHDD: Why I think the vote count is more or less accurate
« Reply #2 on: November 25, 2016, 05:51:40 AM »
They're REALLY suckin' on a bong when they start talking about a re-vote.

 :stoner: :stoner: :stoner: :stoner: :stoner:

ETA - by the way, a lot of my family members left the 'President' line blank, though I have to say none of them are Black Detroit voters.
« Last Edit: November 25, 2016, 05:55:12 AM by DumbAss Tanker »
Logged
Go and tell the Spartans, O traveler passing by
That here, obedient to their law, we lie.

Anything worth shooting once is worth shooting at least twice.

Offline Carl

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 19838
  • Reputation: +1618/-100
Re: PHDD: Why I think the vote count is more or less accurate
« Reply #3 on: November 25, 2016, 05:57:06 AM »
Even if Stein doesn`t run off with their money while laughing the first recount that comes through and says Trump won the state will be rejected out of hand with some new conspiracy theory.

The fact is that,as usual,they come up with a notion and then believe it to be true.
A recount is not a repeat of the hanging chad debacle,it is simply a recheck of ballot totals.
Logged

Offline FlippyDoo

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2479
  • Reputation: +1262/-14
  • Your president, too.
Re: PHDD: Why I think the vote count is more or less accurate
« Reply #4 on: November 25, 2016, 06:23:51 AM »
Quote
Response to BainsBane (Original post)

Fri Nov 25, 2016, 02:21 AM

Star Member ucrdem (10,697 posts)

9. Here's why I disagree:
 
Michigan - More African-American voters than MN, and many thousands of ballots reported with no presidential vote from Detroit;
Wisconsin - 85% voter turnout and other anomalies in the county reports;
Pennsylvania - Anomalous R wins in Luzerne and similar counties.


We lost so it had to be stolen. We told everyone that if they didn't vote for her royal majesty that they were stupid, racist, sexist, homophobic, and yada, yada, yada so it had to be stolen.

So if the recounts go forward I'm prepared to be disappointed but I'd say the odds of waking up and finding out that Hillary is going be inaugurated are about 50-50

Fixed it.
Logged
Fictional spirit-guiding by appointment.
conservativecave.com & conservativeunderground.com

For new members and lurkers: I am a fictional spirit-guide with no smell whatsoever. I am part irish setter and part pigeon. If you don't smell any strange smells it means I'm probably standing next to you. As I am a fictional character anything I post should possibly be considered fictional.

Offline Ralph Wiggum

  • It's unpossible that I'm a
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 19495
  • Reputation: +2554/-49
Re: PHDD: Why I think the vote count is more or less accurate
« Reply #5 on: November 25, 2016, 08:43:36 AM »
The Democrat memes have become awfully clear.  The latest seems to be "blame Russia".
Logged
Voted hottest "chick" at CU - My hotness transcends gender

Offline 98ZJUSMC

  • The Most Deplorable
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8424
  • Reputation: +436/-76
  • Now, with 99% less yellow!
Re: PHDD: Why I think the vote count is more or less accurate
« Reply #6 on: November 25, 2016, 09:08:19 AM »
Quote from: Patriot Guard Rider on November 25, 2016, 05:41:15 AM
They set themselves up for disappointment.

Hopes of a recount
Hopes of a redo of the election
Hopes of intimidating electoral college members
Hopes of the DNC doing something.

When nothing comes through, they fall further and further into despair.



Quote
I only wish that site had been up on election night. The responses as one state after another fell to Trump would have made me stand up and give myself a high five. But $kimmer, with his wifes ties to the DNC, knew the exit polling and knew Pickles Von Cankles was going to lose. He turned the site off and blamed a hacker, all so the place wouldn't absolutely explode election night.

We should sue for Refusal of Services.
Logged
              

Liberal thinking is a two-legged stool and magical thinking is one of the legs, the other is a combination of self-loating and misanthropy.  To understand it, you would have to be able to sit on that stool while juggling two elephants, an anvil and a fragmentation grenade, sans pin.

"Accuse others of what you do." - Karl Marx
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »