proglodytes have melt down over Oregon verdict

[Charlespg]

http://www.democraticunderground.com/10141608768#post1

          dbackjon (5,993 posts)
8. What other evidence did they need?

We need to occupy these idiot jurors houses and trash them.             

There was a Spanish  gentleman by the last name of Franco  who knew how to deal with folks like this

[Carl]

Response to Coyotl (Original post)

Thu Oct 27, 2016, 07:35 PM

Star Member geek tragedy (65,269 posts)
9. Next time the feds just need to use armed force

very clear that unless they fear death they have zero reason to worry about the idiot jurors in that part of the country actually applying the law

Hope you feel the same about BLM rioters.

[jukin]

Now I hope there is justice for the man murdered by the Obama regime.

[I_B_Perky]

Frank has a thread here with more comments from the dump:

http://conservativecave.com/index.php?topic=109579.0

[franksolich]

Frank has a thread here with more comments from the dump:

http://conservativecave.com/index.php?topic=109579.0

He posted this as a favor, because I was having problems copying-and-pasting.

This is one of those things that needs dispersed far and wide, spread around as much as possible--the disturbing fact that apparently we harbor Nazis among us.

[Ptarmigan]

DU is in full nuclear meltdown. Time to get my Geiger counter out again.

[Karin]

Response to Coyotl (Original post)

Thu Oct 27, 2016, 07:32 PM

Red Mountain (329 posts)

7. So you can do that and it's OK?
 
Holy shit I never thought this country was that far gone........that the rule of law is meaningless.

It certainly is.  Both your POS president and your POS candidate are criminals, off scot free. 

Response to Coyotl (Original post)

Thu Oct 27, 2016, 07:51 PM

alarimer (14,439 posts)

17. I bet there were anti-government ****ers on the jury
 
They need to investigate them all. This is a ****ing travesty. Maybe get rid of the jury system, since Americans are too ducking stupid to understand anything anymore. The government should have gone in, guns blazing, and killed every last one of those assholes. They do not get to own this country !!!!!!!!!

Wow!     That's off the charts. 

And in reply, this asshole:

Response to alarimer (Reply #17)

Thu Oct 27, 2016, 09:47 PM

philosslayer (2,792 posts)

65. AMEN!!!
 
Investigate the jurors. Possible charges of collusion and conspiracy. 

And here we have the stupidest post of the day:

Response to Coyotl (Original post)

Fri Oct 28, 2016, 03:38 AM

DonCoquixote (11,315 posts)

78. Same reason Zimmerman got off
 
The purpose of the NRA is to protect the right of White Males to shoot minorities and Federal officers.

[Carl]

What you see at the DUmp is exactly what the founders envisioned when they wrote the Bill of Rights,the 2nd in particular.

[SVPete]

Well, I'm glad DU-folk are having their much-deserved meltdown.

[jukin]

The DUchebags are in such an uproar some are even thinking about taking a shower.

[Karin]

On this thread, http://www.democraticunderground.com/10028256760  geek tragedy wants to go all Waco over everyone's ass.

Response to appal_jack (Reply #16)

Fri Oct 28, 2016, 11:15 AM

Star Member geek tragedy (65,299 posts)

18. which is why cases of armed insurrection should not be trusted to juries, outsourcing
 
the stability of the Republic to 12 wackos in a room is unwise. The criminal justice system exists to prosecute crime, not to prevent armed rebellion and armed insurgencies.

Armed insurrections should be defeated via force, not prosecuted.
 

appal_jack (3,035 posts)

23. Fine: advocate murderous dictatorship if you want.
 
Bookmarking this response of yours. What shall we use instead of juries of peers? Secret tribunals? Star Chambers, perhaps?

I hope other DU'ers distance themselves from your autocratic, anti-democratic position. I visit this site as an American who believes in Constitutional governance first, and an advocate for progressives and Democrats to pursue that end second. You, on the other hand, seem to be here to advocate murdering innocents who happen to disagree with your positions.
 

Response to appal_jack (Reply #23)

Fri Oct 28, 2016, 11:26 AM

Star Member geek tragedy (65,299 posts)

25. lol, the Bundy occupiers are now 'innocents' in your estimation? cool story bro
 
They should have been dealt with in Nevada.

Very simple rule: if you use armed force against the US government, you should be dealt with harshly and decisively so that future insurrectionists draw the appropriate lesson.

that jury of anti-government fanatics just put other federal workers in danger through their waving of pom-poms for armed insurrection.

As I said, when it comes to armed attacks and insurrection, juries are not an appropriate tool for prevention
 

[franksolich]

On this thread, http://www.democraticunderground.com/10028256760  geek tragedy wants to go all Waco over everyone's ass.

Why are some primitives so worried about "protecting" the government from its citizens?

Given how overwhelmingly powerful the government is, and that the primitives usually allege themselves to sympathize with the underdogs, it doesn't make sense.

To some of us, it seems as if the people need protected from the government.

[Carl]

Response to NaturalHigh (Original post)

Fri Oct 28, 2016, 01:52 PM

awoke_in_2003 (33,890 posts)
42. We need to rid ourselves

of this whole "jury of peers" nonsense. The only people who serve on juries are those dumb enough not to figure out how to get themselves out of it. Replace them with people whose job is being and have at least a little bit of knowledge of the law.

Any doubt that they want tyranny?

[franksolich]

Any doubt that they want tyranny?

It's been a while, but the day George Zimmerman was adjudged innocent in the murder of the thug Trayvon, the "OmahaBlueDog" primitive on Skins's island advocated that juries be abolished and replaced by "experts."

It chills the bones.