Manny's jackass primitives still won't support Messalina Agrippina

[franksolich]

http://jackpineradicals.com/boards/topic/a-president-clinton-would-be-out-of-controlusa-today/

Oh my.

Still kicking a lady--their lady, by the way, not ours--when she's down, showing real class.

Ichingcarpenter    (1504 posts)    October 31, 2016 at 3:06 am
 
A President Clinton would be out of control:USA Today

“Someone somewhere should have told her no.” Those are the words of a Clinton ally quoted in a roundup of Democratic reactions to Hillary Clinton’s FBI news by congressional newspaper The Hill. And, despite the fact that they come from a Clinton supporter, albeit an angry and disappointed one, they may illustrate the best reason for choosing Donald Trump instead of Clinton.

Here’s the full quote:

“I’m livid, actually. . . .This has turned into malpractice. It’s an unforced error at this point. I have no idea what Comey is up to but the idea this email issue is popping back up again is outrageous. It never should have occurred in the first place. Someone somewhere should have told her no. And they didn’t and now we’re all paying the price.”

Someone, somewhere, should have told her no. Well, yes. But who? That was the problem with Secretary of State Clinton, and it will be a bigger problem with a President Clinton. Because, by all appearances, nobody tells Clinton no, and Clinton has no compunction about breaking the rules when it suits her purposes.

Thus the Clinton Foundation became a global money-laundering and influence-peddling organization without precedent in American history. Donors to the foundation were encouraged to steer money to what one employee called “Bill Clinton, Inc.,” and later to Clinton. State Department personnel did favors for people who donated moneyto the Foundation. And to make sure that nobody found out what was going on, Clinton ran her own homebrew server operation designed to ensure that Freedom of Information Act requests turned up nothing — and even President Obama, rather than saying no, went along, sending her emails at her non-government address under a fake name.

Someone somewhere should have told her no. But if the president wasn’t going to tell her no, who would? Staff at the State Department? They might have been willing to tell some other secretary of state no, but Clinton? Too risky, it seems. They certainly went along without visible objection, and without even leaks.

The press? When The New York Times reported Clinton’s secret, illegal server, Politico’s Glenn Thrush, far from condemning it, called it “badass.”

Congress? Clinton has stonewalled and run rings around numerous committees investigating her. Besides, Congress had already told her no,…………..

http://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/2016/10/30/hillary-clinton-email-investigation-trump-president-glenn-reynolds/93006320/

Goes on to say Trump is bad but Hillary doesn’t know the word no and he will have to……….

Demeter     (4582 posts)  (Reply to original post)    October 31, 2016 at 3:24 am
 
2. It's fortunate for the nation that the cops and military hate Her

because otherwise, we’d be couped like Nazi Germany was.

Talk about your close shaves–this one was a Sweeney Todd special, just waiting!

Yep, two close shaves in one year.

The first being the gimme crowd didn't get the Democrat nomination for the presidency.

notesdev     (1210 posts)  (Reply to original post)    October 31, 2016 at 3:30 am
 
3. No shit

Even for the naifs who believe Trump is every bit as bad as Clinton, fact is that Clinton will have friendly press and bureaucracy and political establishment where Trump would face hostile ones. So Her would have a free hand while he would be tightly restrained by all the pushback.

[Carl]

I have no argument with anything the jackasses said.
Obummer ordered her to keep Sid Vicious away from State Department business and she spit on that her first day.

[DumbAss Tanker]

Ichingcarpenter    (1504 posts)    October 31, 2016 at 3:06 am
 
A President Clinton would be out of control:USA Today

“Someone somewhere should have told her no.” Those are the words of a Clinton ally quoted in a roundup of Democratic reactions to Hillary Clinton’s FBI news by congressional newspaper The Hill.

Left unsaid by the same Clinton ally:  "And by that I mean 'Someone else.'  Someone who is unhappy with life, and who has a Hell of an insurance policy, or just no family left at all.  Someone with nothing left to lose, who longs for the sweet release of death."

[BadCat]

Why has no one pointed out, that when one obtains a security clearance and signs the form (which everybody has to do), the form says that you are REQUIRED to report any security violation of which you become aware?  Consequences for not doing so could be almost as bad as the violations itself.

So, EVERYONE who knew of the server and even had the slightest inkling that it may have classified data, had a DUTY to report it.  None of them did.

[BadCat]

Look at this picture of a Hillary rally...



The same people are photoshopped all over it.  Actual attendance maybe 20?

[franksolich]

Look at this picture of a Hillary rally...

The same people are photoshopped all over it.  Actual attendance maybe 20?

Good find, and there's more duplicates than just that one woman who's circled.

[landofconfusion80]

Good find, and there's more duplicates than just that one woman who's circled.

Same chunk done like 8 times

Sent from my SCH-I545 using Tapatalk

[DumbAss Tanker]

Same chunk done like 8 times

Sent from my SCH-I545 using Tapatalk

Frank is right, and not only are there a dozen cases circled in the pic, there are at least two more instances of the same group in that pic which aren't circled, one at the bottom center and one off to the right top (The gal with the curly hair is off the frame, but the bald guys to her left are there.

[USA4ME]

The jackals are only interested in one thing; they want to shove into the faces of the hillbots that the bern should have gotten the Dem nomination. That's all they want; to say "we told you so."

It's no different than the primitives wanting a dem to win just because they're a dem. Ask them anything beyond why they want a dem to win and all you'll get back is a bunch of LW talking points about how great gov't is and name calling. There's no thought. There never has been thought. It's just "we won" and now let me blame everything wrong in my life (which is virtually everything) on my political opponents until I can vote dem again and start the process over. The concept that their own voting patterns are what builds the dungeon around them is so far beyond their ability to think that it's non-existent to them.

.

[franksolich]

The jackals are only interested in one thing; they want to shove into the faces of the hillbots that the bern should have gotten the Dem nomination. That's all they want; to say "we told you so."

That's it, and it betrays their personal gross immaturity.

These are people in middle age and older, who think that if they act and think like teenagers, they'll be young forever.  I give you the example--one of many--of the idiot girl on Manny's jackass message board, with her "bunnies," a word most 63-year-old women would be embarrassed to use.

[BadCat]

That's it, and it betrays their personal gross immaturity.

These are people in middle age and older, who think that if they act and think like teenagers, they'll be young forever.  I give you the example--one of many--of the idiot girl on Manny's jackass message board, with her "bunnies," a word most 63-year-old women would be embarrassed to use.

It's not as bad as "pink bits"

[franksolich]

It's not as bad as "pink bits"

Right, especially as used by the 66-year-old defrocked warped primitive, "Warpy," the one with a face like Hindenberg's.

[Bad Dog]

I want to change my vote from the coach's survey about Skinner letting them come home.  I said they should be allowed back after a few very public executions.  I now see that they all have to be cast into the wilderness.

[Gina]

Good find, and there's more duplicates than just that one woman who's circled.

That's a woman?

[Bad Dog]

That's a woman?

With the whole self identity thing, I don't even try anymore.

[Big Dog]

Right, especially as used by the 66-year-old defrocked warped primitive, "Warpy," the one with a face like Hindenberg's.

Maybe her "bits" were pink during the Carter administration, but now they look like rancid Arby's roast beef.