is Messalina Agrippina messing with Manny's jackass message board?

[franksolich]

Earlier, there was a thread over there in which the cousin nadin officiously informed management of Manny's jackass message board that they were under a "denial of service" attack.

But as usual nobody paid attention to nadin.

And now we got this:

http://jackpineradicals.com/boards/topic/julian-assange-my-next-leak-will-ensure-hillary-clintons-arrest-19/

Segami    (251 posts)
July 24, 2016 at 2:31 pm
 
Julian Assange: My Next Leak Will ENSURE Hillary Clinton’s Arrest

“…Wikileaks founder Julian Assange has said that Wikileaks have obtained information that, when released soon, will guarantee a Hillary Clinton indictment..."

During a recent interview with ITV, Assange said his next release will “provide enough evidence” to see Hillary arrested.

Silenceisconsent.net reports:

WikiLeaks has already published 30,322 emails from Clinton’s private email server, spanning from June 30, 2010 to August 12, 2014. While Assange didn’t specify what exactly was in the emails, he did tell ITV that WikiLeaks had “accumulated a lot of material about Hillary Clinton, which could proceed to an indictment.”

Assange hinted that the emails slated for publication contain additional information about the Clinton Foundation. He also reminded ITV’s Robert Peston that previously released emails contained one damning piece of communication from Clinton, instructing a staffer to remove the classification settings from an official State Department communication and send it through a “nonsecure” channel. Assange then pointed out that the Obama administration has previously prosecuted numerous whistleblowers for violating the government’s procedures for handling classified documents.

cont’

http://yournewswire.com/julian-assange-my-next-leak-will-ensure-hillarys-arrest/

Mosby     (47 posts)  (Reply to original post)   
July 24, 2016 at 2:36 pm
 
1. you posted this 17 times?

can this be fixed?

Infact7     (119 posts)  (Reply to Mosby - post #1)   
July 24, 2016 at 2:39 pm
 
2. yeah. it's seriously bogging bandwidth it seems.

Everything is slowing down. Not just this member… several regulars so I don’t think it’s malicious.

Segami     (251 posts)  (Reply to Mosby - post #1)   
July 24, 2016 at 2:46 pm
 
4. Trying to get help……

Beebee     (281 posts)  (Reply to Segami - post #4)   
July 24, 2016 at 3:04 pm
 
5. I've had problems all day here trying to get pages to load and difficulties

posting so I do not believe it is just you. It takes forever for something to come up or for a reply to post.

Have even tried on a different device w no better success.

Something is up.

[Carl]

With out a doubt the Clintoon machine has seen what the jackasses have said and are out to crush them.

[tanstaafl]

franksolich! I'm happy to see you back posting. Was starting to let a little worry creep in.

I doubt if it shillary's bunch doing this, unless it comes out in the next installments of wikileaks. If asked to vote, I'd say it was some one,or ones, at the DUmp.

[miskie]

It could be a lot of things, I haven't bothered to get a read on what the Jackals host their home on.

[franksolich]

Notice now posted at the top of the front page:

Hey! Sorry for the site doing weird things. Turns out that we were maxing CPU - it seems that we're  getting busier and needed more CPU. So I added more CPU. Now it seems OK.

It doesn't say if it's Manny who did that, or one of his two femme assistants.

[SVPete]

Sounds like some one wasn't paying attention to the nuts and bolts stuff, like CPU usage. I wonder how efficiently it is set up.

[FaC]

Hey! Sorry for the site doing weird things. Turns out that we were maxing CPU - it seems that we're  getting busier and needed more CPU. So I added more CPU. Now it seems OK.

I doubt you have gotten enough new readers (i.e. suckers) to significantly increase CPU requirements. Of course, depending on how well your hosting service protects against DOS attacks your CPU increase could just possibly be related to DOS attacks.

If you come back tomorrow and say that you need still more CPU because the newly added CPU has already been consumed then I would look for an  attack rather than newfound web popularity...