I'm not trying to stir up @#$%, but how does that compare to a similar 2-year period from, e.g., 2003-2006 or 1993-1996? IOW, is that 1/3-3/8 rate of infection typical, higher than typical, or even lower than typical?
That said, the problem is real, and with the Feds in charge of where at least some refugees get dum ... errrrr ... located, states and communities are getting blind-sided with public health issues for which they are at best only partly (i.e. hypothetically) prepared. And the Feds aren't going to inform the states and communities of those prospective concerns, since that would stir up questions and opposition - more than there already is - to what the Feds are doing.