Warpy gets heaping helping of Humble Pie on this one:
http://upload.democraticunderground.com/10027710126A light weight poster asks an innocent question:
Matrosov (649 posts)
Why the double standard with Abrahamic religion?
Criticize Christianity.. that's considered enlightened progressiveness.
Criticize Judaism.. that's considered enlightened progressiveness.
Criticize Islam.. GET THE **** OUT OF HERE YOU RACIST ISLAMOPHOBIC KNUCKLE-DRAGGING RIGHTWINGER!!!
We have no problem blaming Judaism when Jewish extremists attack and kill Palestinians. We have no problem blaming Christianity when Christian extremists shoot up or blow up abortion clinics. But when Islamic extremists kill people in Paris, San Bernardino, or Brussels? Nope, it has nothing to do with Islam, the religion of peace, and if you dare suggest otherwise then GET THE **** OUT OF HERE YOU RACIST ISLAMOPHOBIC KNUCKLE-DRAGGING RIGHTWINGER!!!
Why? Because of conservatives? We should base our approach on reason, and if we value constructive criticism of one belief system that involves an imaginary friend in the sky, we should value constructive criticism of ALL belief systems that involve imaginary friends in the sky, especially when their followers think their imaginary friends instruct them to kill. Regardless of what conservatives think about any specific such system.
If conservatives magically embraced Islam and began preaching against Christianity and Judaism, would that be a logical reason for us to suddenly allow criticism of Islam but flip out whenever someone criticized Christianity or Judaism? Nope. No belief system that encourages its followers to fight the unbelievers or discriminate against people based on their gender or sexual orientation - things all Abrahamic religions do - should be exempt from criticism.
17
Now I don't know if this might be a mole or troll but the question is certainly a valid one to ask albeit probably not in the land of heathens, haters, and hypocrites.
Star Member Nye Bevan (23,469 posts)
1. Because
(1) people here are terrified about being perceived as Islamophobic,
(2) they are reluctant to agree with the Republicans about anything, and
(3) they mistakenly believe that criticizing Islamic fundamentalism is tantamount to arguing in favor of US military action in the Middle East.
That's why in many DU threads about Islamic atrocities there will be replies along the lines of "yes, but the Christian fundies are just as bad / would do that here if they could" etc.
opps missed a set of quote blocks first time through...
Response to Nye Bevan (Reply #1)Wed Mar 23, 2016, 10:34 PM
Warpy (86,893 posts)
6. and (4) They know Muslims as neighbors and coworkers and like them
and that means the Islamophobes are full of shit and should be called out.
This is the kind of hysterical, fear-driven garbage that led to the wholesale internment of Japanese citizens in WWII.
This gets the ball rolling so to speak.
Nichevo11 (8 posts)
95. I see nothing hysterical in that post.
Please point out what's hysterical about criticizing a religion that demands a mixing of government and religion, demands that males and females live under different laws, and is stuck pretty much where Christianity was during th Dark Ages?
By the way, I married a Muslim. WARPY TAKE NOTE!! <- 
I'll bet I have more Muslim friends, acquaintances, and relatives than most people here.
I look forward to the day when Islam evolves out of its current widespread horrors, as the other two religions pretty much have (their lunatic fringes notwithstanding).
I concede that we outsiders often do more harm than good, with our wacky talk of, gasp!, gender equality and gay rights and protection for religious dissenters and apostates.
But yes: it is quite okay to criticize Islam. And you can do it while loving plenty of Muslims.
Warpy now begins to fight a brief rear guard action.
Response to Nichevo11 (Reply #95)Thu Mar 24, 2016, 10:53 AM
Warpy (86,893 posts)
104. "Some of my best friends are?"
And her rear is quite obviously exposed when you are reading deficient or lack comprehension skills...
There are no end of apologists, Some with questionable math skills:
Binkie The Clown (1,790 posts)
49. It's totally unfair to criticize the 1.6 billion Muslims for the actions of
the mere 160,000 or so extremists. (Best estimates put the extremists at about 10% of Muslims)
But that doesn't mean we should ignore those 160,000 extremists who really do want to see Western civilization destroyed.
Soon corrected by the best and brightest.
FreedomRain (357 posts)
54. 10% of 1.6B is 160M not 160K
and is an outrageously high best estimate, I can only hope.
I lived in Jordan for 2 years and as far as I knew I never met a single extremist.
I began this a few hours ago, this was the last post then:
Democat (10,070 posts)
107. Don't exect many DUers to have a rational response
Many spend their time attacking Christians and defending other religions.
They do it because they think it makes them sound like better people.
I just went back. The thread has since blossomed into full blown DU nuttery. Lots more great posts bashing Christianity, and just in time for Easter! Way to go DU.