Liberals choose to support Hillary even knowing she broke the law.

[Mr Mannn]

http://www.discussionist.com/1015690549#post17
It's only been up 30 minutes and already a majority would vote for her knowing that she broke the law. The standard lib response is to deny everything.
~~I was hoping to shame them into saying no, but they will support a candidate no matter what law is broken. The ends justifies the means.

Da Mannn (5,278 posts)

Liberals only please, A question (not a gotcha question)
What if Hillary email scandal turned out to be TRUE, and she did send 1000+ classified docs on her private servers?


What would you do?
I really want to know if you would still vote for Hillary in spite of breaking the law.

Now I'm not looking for arguments to the contrary....stick with the thread...or start your own.

The poll is 9 votes for YES they would vote for a known lawbreaker
tp 4 votes they would not vote for a law breaker

I will try to keep a running tally for you. I really didn't think they would be honest with me.

[Mr Mannn]

It is nor 12 to 6 Liberal supporting obvious lawbreaking in office.
Most of the replies are nasty, obnoxious, or just plain denials of reality.

Here is one from a fellow conservative warrior at this site.

Zimm_Man_Fan (5,339 posts)
43. The majority of replies you've gotten so far shows why any kind of civil or good

faith discourse and debate with most liberals - not all; but MOST - is simply futile: they are not interested in dialogue. They are interested in their opponents sitting down and shutting up, and allowing only their childish, self-loathing ideology the run of the field in public discourse.

But good try - you showed once again that conservatives are on the Right Side of Human Decency with your efforts to discuss something with the Left in good faith. They're just not up to acting like decent human beings in most instances.

[Texacon]

She has deleted over 30,000 email!  What is that equal to in Nixon tape minutes?

KC

[miskie]

She has deleted over 30,000 email!  What is that equal to in Nixon tape minutes?

KC

IIRC, that was about half of the Emails she reportedly started off with, so I'd say half of the total run time.

[fatboy]

She has deleted over 30,000 email!  What is that equal to in Nixon tape minutes?

KC

Dude, It's not anything serious like one of her staff ordering a lane closure at the George Washington Bridge or she insulted some rapists.

Perspective is everything.   

[Delmar]

It is nor 12 to 6 Liberal supporting obvious lawbreaking in office.
Most of the replies are nasty, obnoxious, or just plain denials of reality.

Here is one from a fellow conservative warrior at this site.

Now it's 15 to 10 in favor of lawlessness.  And of the 10 that are saying that they wouldn't vote for Hillary I would estimate that 10 of them answered that way because they are Bernie bots, not for virtuous reasons.

[thundley4]

Now it's 15 to 10 in favor of lawlessness.  And of the 10 that are saying that they wouldn't vote for Hillary I would estimate that 10 of them answered that way because they are Bernie bots, not for virtuous reasons.

They're democrats, all 25 of them will vote for Hillary when she is crowned with the nomination.

[obumazombie]

There are only a few ways to get a lib to tell the truth.
Let them talk long enough, and they run out of lies.
Let them talk long enough, and they accidentally let the truth slip.
Trick them into telling the truth.

[SSG Snuggle Bunny]

I'd wager that half of those who claim they would not vote for her if she broke the law are lying because they're embarrassed by their own partisanship.

[98ZJUSMC]

They're democrats, all 25 of them will vote for Hillary when she is crowned with the nomination.

I don't know.  Story links a Reuters Poll.  To early to tell, of course, but I think the (D)Marxists are in deep shit and not just in the presidential.  I think a lot of disgruntled Bernouts are going to Trump when the DNC®LLC kicks Gramps Hippie to the curb.  They seriously hate PIAPS.

If, .....she's not indicted. I know, I know....

http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2016/01/10/white-flight-trump-holds-20-point-lead-over-hillary-among-white-working-class/

Poll is saying he leads the despicable hag with the working-class, regardless of race.

Not good for the (D)Marxists.

[SVPete]

This side of November, 2017 (assuming she gets the nomination), these messes are albatrosses around Tsaritsa Chill's political neck. And not just in direct PR. Whether she gets indicted or not is in BHO's hands. If she hoes too far off the Obamian Plantation, if she takes a crap on his "legacy" (such as it is), the Indictment Hammer falls. Tsaritsa Chill needs separation between herself and BHO, and all this tethers her to him, and gags/muffles her political speech.

OTOH, if the Rs and conservatives get enough of what Tsaritsa Chill did "out there" - bypassing the MSM or swamping/shaming them into covering it - and she doesn't get the D nomination, she may become a liability and a convenient scapegoat.

[BlueStateSaint]

This side of November, 2017 (assuming she gets the nomination), these messes are albatrosses around Tsaritsa Chill's political neck. And not just in direct PR. Whether she gets indicted or not is in BHO's hands. If she hoes too far off the Obamian Plantation, if she takes a crap on his "legacy" (such as it is), the Indictment Hammer falls. Tsaritsa Chill needs separation between herself and BHO, and all this tethers her to him, and gags/muffles her political speech.

OTOH, if the Rs and conservatives get enough of what Tsaritsa Chill did "out there" - bypassing the MSM or swamping/shaming them into covering it - and she doesn't get the D nomination, she may become a liability and a convenient scapegoat.

The 'wild card' in all of this is the Federal Bureau of Investigation.  They know, without a shadow of a doubt, what came out last weekend about HilLIARy instructing an aide to retransmit classified information after removing the classification markings--in 2011.  IIRC, each message that had its' classification removed, then retransmitted via nonsecure means is a felony.  The FBI does not look lightly on such egregious flaunting of the nation's cybersecurity laws.  Remember the story that came out two weeks ago about the former US Attorney under President Bush that said that HilLIARy would be indicted in 60 days?  I'd wager that he's been 'in the know' for some time, and he's merely 'leaking' information that he's been provided--and told that he'd be protected over.

The FBI is making sure that they have an absolutely ironclad case against her before announcing said action, IMO.

[SVPete]

The 'wild card' in all of this is the Federal Bureau of Investigation.  They know, without a shadow of a doubt, what came out last weekend about HilLIARy instructing an aide to retransmit classified information after removing the classification markings--in 2011.  IIRC, each message that had its' classification removed, then retransmitted via nonsecure means is a felony.  The FBI does not look lightly on such egregious flaunting of the nation's cybersecurity laws.  Remember the story that came out two weeks ago about the former US Attorney under President Bush that said that HilLIARy would be indicted in 60 days?  I'd wager that he's been 'in the know' for some time, and he's merely 'leaking' information that he's been provided--and told that he'd be protected over.

The FBI is making sure that they have an absolutely ironclad case against her before announcing said action, IMO.

Frankly, I hope you are correct and I'm being pessimistic. The arrogant lawlessness and tyranny of the Obama regime needs to be exposed, clearly, for what it was and is. Exposing The Chill's flaunting of the law and endangering the US and allies would be a good start, and not just because she is running for the D nomination (exposing the Ds' readiness to go with some one as arrogant, corrupt, and lawless as The Chill would be a very salutary bonus, though).

[hillneck]

I was noticing how hard it was to keep the liberals in that thread focused on the subject at hand.  They truly are dense. 

[freedumb2003b]

It is always fun when they bury themselves:

shortviking (3,586 posts)
47. A few examples

I support single payer. I think government ought to either provide me with a job or a check. It is government's perogative to tell business what it can and can't do. In fact I'd like to see corporate charters make a comeback. Most people shouldn't have to file taxes(although I differ with the left's creepy reverence for the IRS). I'm generally anti-war. I support ACTUAL freedom as opposed to the selective shit that fascist colleges and DU advocate. So really, I'm more liberal than DU. fin

It has been proven time and time again that freedom can only thrive in a capitalist economy.  This libtard wants the "freedom" of free stuff, including money, with no cost to itself at all.

[dutch508]

16 for - 12 against.

graham4anything4HC45 (18,792 posts)
6. Actually there is nothing illegal done. So of free mind, I would continue.

and voted yes, with the stipulation of my vote in the title above.

My vote is for the Democratic party

I would vote for either Underwood if they were the nominee of the Democratic party.

MrSlayer666 (6,164 posts)
12. As a liberal, I want Sanders to win.

Because he's an actual FDR style politician. I'm not big on Hillary because she's way too much like a Republican for me.

However, against any of the Republicans running, I would absolutely vote for her. We simply can't afford to have a far right extremist as President. I really don't care about the email stuff. It's ginned up nonsense. But even if there was something to it, there's no way I'm voting for a Republican.

These aren't Eisenhower Republicans. They're John Birch crazies, neo-con war mongers and religious nuts.

myohmy (239 posts)
21. I'd have to vote for Hillary.

There's too much at stake for us in this election to have a Republican in the White House and Republicans controlling Congress. I'm absolutely convinced a Republican controlled government would begin destroying Social Security and Medicare from day one.

Beyond Republican and Democrat, many of us (like me) need Social Security and Medicare just to survive.

JoePolitics (9,039 posts)
26. Absolutely.

The GOP would kill the ACA, Social Security, Medicare, PP, Medicaid, and go to full boots on the ground war with about 4 ME countries.

Its an easy decision.

The GOP can not be allowed any closer to the White House than on a visitors tour.

rumnrockets (315 posts)
31. I voted "yes".

It would take more than a Democrat using the wrong email account to send a message for me to throw my vote to the Republicans.

We have a two-party system, which allows me 3 choices: vote Republican, vote Democrat, or don't vote. I'm not voting Republican, and I'm not sitting it out.

Protecting the environment is my number one issue -- protecting the land, air, water, and the living organisms that they support. Intact ecosystems. Clear, clean running rivers. Breathable air. Healthy land. Wild, open spaces. Every things else is a side-line, as far as I'm concerned. And there isn't a shred of doubt which party is closer to my perspective.

I supported Barack Obama in 2008, Rocky Anderson in 2012, and I will be supporting Bernie Sanders in the 2016 primary

[Chris_]

They are a funny bunch.

[GOP Congress]

That's peanuts. They should be asking if they would support a rapist for president, like Joy Behar, whom would support a rapist over a republican.

http://www.newsbusters.org/blogs/nb/scott-whitlock/2016/01/05/joy-behar-id-vote-rapist-long-theyre-liberal#.ltlgnxr:wZHC

[BannedFromDU]

That's peanuts. They should be asking if they would support a rapist for president, like Joy Behar, whom would support a rapist over a republican.

http://www.newsbusters.org/blogs/nb/scott-whitlock/2016/01/05/joy-behar-id-vote-rapist-long-theyre-liberal#.ltlgnxr:wZHC

     Behar evidently chose from the two the one that would be willing to sleep with her.

[Ptarmigan]

graham4anything4HC45 (18,792 posts)
6. Actually there is nothing illegal done. So of free mind, I would continue.

and voted yes, with the stipulation of my vote in the title above.

My vote is for the Democratic party

I would vote for either Underwood if they were the nominee of the Democratic party.

Ah, Graham4Anything. Is Skinner going to unban you and let you back into DU since he is purging all the pro-Bernie Sanders people?

[Ralph Wiggum]

Ah, Graham4Anything. Is Skinner going to unban you and let you back into DU since he is purging all the pro-Bernie Sanders people?

Funny that Graham crackers is still on that same narrative of Hillary guaranteed to win.

Because his 2014 predictions were SO accurate.