« previous next »
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: New study claims Bush actually won in 2000  (Read 2144 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Carl

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 19837
  • Reputation: +1617/-100
New study claims Bush actually won in 2000
« on: November 05, 2015, 12:27:51 PM »
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10027318705

Quote
Thu Nov 5, 2015, 12:57 PM

StrongBad (2,047 posts)

New study claims Bush actually won in 2000
Apparently the newest counting of undervotes puts him on top:

http://www.cnn.com/2015/10/31/politics/bush-gore-2000-election-results-studies/

Not sure what to think about this. Why all of a sudden is this result being produced?

It still shows double vote inclusion going to Gore. So confusing.

The article in the link seems pretty straightforward and shows that under any possible legal counting Bush would have won.

The misfits and reality will never mix. :lmao:

Quote
Response to StrongBad (Original post)

Thu Nov 5, 2015, 01:03 PM

Star Member joeybee12 (52,357 posts)
4. Gore won...the judge in charge of the recount that never happened...

SAid he intended to use a standard that would have shown Gore won...all these hypotheticals about what standard would have been used is just BS to try and blur the fact that Gore won and on December 10, 2000, democracy ceaesed to exist in this country.

 :hyper:

Quote
Response to joeybee12 (Reply #4)

Thu Nov 5, 2015, 01:04 PM

StrongBad (2,047 posts)
5. But isn't citing a judge that would have used a certain standard a hypothetical itself?

That argument kind of collapses on itself.

Quote
Response to StrongBad (Reply #5)

Thu Nov 5, 2015, 01:06 PM

Star Member joeybee12 (52,357 posts)
6. NO, no and no...

The recount was set to begin, the judge who was to oversee it had been chosen, then SCOTUS stopped everything...all these studies about what he might have used are BS...the judge had chosen his standard, and that standard would have shown Gore won...google it

Quote
Response to StrongBad (Original post)

Thu Nov 5, 2015, 01:07 PM

Star Member underpants (113,568 posts)
8. A. BS B. BS

Quote
Response to StrongBad (Original post)

Thu Nov 5, 2015, 01:12 PM

CJCRANE (17,500 posts)
10. So it's not April 1st and this isn't the Onion...

Lurking DUmbasses...



 :tongue: :tongue: :tongue:
Logged

Offline thundley4

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 40571
  • Reputation: +2224/-127
Re: New study claims Bush actually won in 2000
« Reply #1 on: November 05, 2015, 12:32:13 PM »
The New York Slime and several other liberal rags did their own study/recount after President Bush was in office and concluded that if a recount was done statewide using the same standards that Gore wanted in select democrat strongholds, that Bush would have won by a larger margin.
Logged

Offline Happy Fun Ball

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2939
  • Reputation: +1035/-11
Re: New study claims Bush actually won in 2000
« Reply #2 on: November 05, 2015, 12:34:37 PM »
Logged

Offline hillneck

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1519
  • Reputation: +120/-5
Re: New study claims Bush actually won in 2000
« Reply #3 on: November 05, 2015, 12:40:17 PM »
Everyday that passes these idiots come up with a new standard of "batshit crazy".     :mental:
Logged
In battle you have to show no mercy for mercy comes after the war when you still have the freedom to ask for it.

"Montani Semper Liberi"

Pray as if God will take care of all; act as if all is up to you.

Offline Duke Nukum

  • Assistant Chair of the Committee on Neighborhood Services
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8015
  • Reputation: +561/-202
  • O frabjous day! Callooh! Callay!'
Re: New study claims Bush actually won in 2000
« Reply #4 on: November 05, 2015, 12:41:08 PM »
joeybee12's gibberish comes off as gibberish.
Logged
“A man who has been through bitter experiences and travelled far enjoys even his sufferings after a time”
― Homer, The Odyssey

Offline Texacon

  • Super
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13063
  • Reputation: +1674/-55
  • All The Way!
Re: New study claims Bush actually won in 2000
« Reply #5 on: November 05, 2015, 01:22:37 PM »
They always leave out the part about the MULTIPLE recounts that were done and the reason the USSC stepped in was because it was getting stupid.  Gore lost all of the recounts, if I remember correctly, but every time the ballots were handled he was getting closer and closer to being the winner.

KC
Logged
  Build a man a fire and he'll be warm for a day.  Set a man on fire and he will be warm for the rest of his life.

*Stolen

Offline Patriot Guard Rider

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2651
  • Reputation: +650/-18
  • Yes, really. Liberals DO disgust me.
Re: New study claims Bush actually won in 2000
« Reply #6 on: November 05, 2015, 02:18:53 PM »
Quote from: Texacon on November 05, 2015, 01:22:37 PM
They always leave out the part about the MULTIPLE recounts that were done and the reason the USSC stepped in was because it was getting stupid.  Gore lost all of the recounts, if I remember correctly, but every time the ballots were handled he was getting closer and closer to being the winner.

KC

As I recall, the decision by the FSC or the USSC was that a recount could happen but it had to encompass the entire state, not just 4 or 5 targeted counties (which used confusing butterfly ballots designed and implemented by democRATS).
Logged
Liberals disgust me. (Now I don't have to remember to put it on each post).

Because only the left goes searching for that which is not there in a desperate attempt to be offended about something.

"If ye love wealth better than liberty, the tranquility of servitude better than the animating contest of freedom, go home from us in peace. We ask not your counsels or your arms. Crouch down and lick the hands which feed you. May your chains set lightly upon you, and may posterity forget that you were our countrymen." - Samuel Adams

Many people do not see evil until the gas is flowing into the chamber. That is why they get on the trains in the first place.

Offline 98ZJUSMC

  • The Most Deplorable
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8424
  • Reputation: +436/-76
  • Now, with 99% less yellow!
Re: New study claims Bush actually won in 2000
« Reply #7 on: November 05, 2015, 02:34:36 PM »
Quote from: Patriot Guard Rider on November 05, 2015, 02:18:53 PM
As I recall, the decision by the FSC or the USSC was that a recount could happen but it had to encompass the entire state, not just 4 or 5 targeted counties (which used confusing butterfly ballots designed and implemented by democRATS).

Trying to recall, but I thought that the absentee (heavily Military) ballots hadn't even been counted yet.
Logged
              

Liberal thinking is a two-legged stool and magical thinking is one of the legs, the other is a combination of self-loating and misanthropy.  To understand it, you would have to be able to sit on that stool while juggling two elephants, an anvil and a fragmentation grenade, sans pin.

"Accuse others of what you do." - Karl Marx

Offline Patriot Guard Rider

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2651
  • Reputation: +650/-18
  • Yes, really. Liberals DO disgust me.
Re: New study claims Bush actually won in 2000
« Reply #8 on: November 05, 2015, 02:37:20 PM »
Quote from: 98ZJUSMC on November 05, 2015, 02:34:36 PM
Trying to recall, but I thought that the absentee (heavily Military) ballots hadn't even been counted yet.

And Sore Loserman tried to have them disqualified due to mailing dates, etc. (Even though the ballots were sent out late).
Logged
Liberals disgust me. (Now I don't have to remember to put it on each post).

Because only the left goes searching for that which is not there in a desperate attempt to be offended about something.

"If ye love wealth better than liberty, the tranquility of servitude better than the animating contest of freedom, go home from us in peace. We ask not your counsels or your arms. Crouch down and lick the hands which feed you. May your chains set lightly upon you, and may posterity forget that you were our countrymen." - Samuel Adams

Many people do not see evil until the gas is flowing into the chamber. That is why they get on the trains in the first place.

Offline Texacon

  • Super
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13063
  • Reputation: +1674/-55
  • All The Way!
Re: New study claims Bush actually won in 2000
« Reply #9 on: November 05, 2015, 02:55:52 PM »
And, all the major news outlets called the race in FL for Gore before the polls closed in the panhandle, thereby causing a lot of voters to leave the long lines and go home since it was already over before they voted.

That whole thing was messed up from top to bottom.

KC
Logged
  Build a man a fire and he'll be warm for a day.  Set a man on fire and he will be warm for the rest of his life.

*Stolen

Offline Patriot Guard Rider

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2651
  • Reputation: +650/-18
  • Yes, really. Liberals DO disgust me.
Re: New study claims Bush actually won in 2000
« Reply #10 on: November 05, 2015, 03:04:39 PM »
Quote from: Texacon on November 05, 2015, 02:55:52 PM
And, all the major news outlets called the race in FL for Gore before the polls closed in the panhandle, thereby causing a lot of voters to leave the long lines and go home since it was already over before they voted.

That whole thing was messed up from top to bottom.

KC

The panhandle is in central time. It's why the networks are now prohibited from calling the state until the voting in the panhandle closes.
Logged
Liberals disgust me. (Now I don't have to remember to put it on each post).

Because only the left goes searching for that which is not there in a desperate attempt to be offended about something.

"If ye love wealth better than liberty, the tranquility of servitude better than the animating contest of freedom, go home from us in peace. We ask not your counsels or your arms. Crouch down and lick the hands which feed you. May your chains set lightly upon you, and may posterity forget that you were our countrymen." - Samuel Adams

Many people do not see evil until the gas is flowing into the chamber. That is why they get on the trains in the first place.

Offline obumazombie

  • Siege engine to lib fortresses
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 21814
  • Reputation: +1661/-578
  • Last of the great minorities
Re: New study claims Bush actually won in 2000
« Reply #11 on: November 05, 2015, 04:12:37 PM »
This particular conspiracy theory is not gaining any traction, and has never had any momentum.
If only it could be linked to chemtrails, and a certain experiment involving cinder blocks, chicken wire and a fire pit.
Then they would really be on to something.
Logged
There were only two options for gender. At last count there are at least 12, according to libs. By that standard, I'm a male lesbian.

Offline ChuckJ

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4796
  • Reputation: +534/-37
Re: New study claims Bush actually won in 2000
« Reply #12 on: November 05, 2015, 04:21:44 PM »
Quote from: Texacon on November 05, 2015, 01:22:37 PM
They always leave out the part about the MULTIPLE recounts that were done and the reason the USSC stepped in was because it was getting stupid.  Gore lost all of the recounts, if I remember correctly, but every time the ballots were handled he was getting closer and closer to being the winner.

KC

Didn't that happen with the gubernatorial election several years back in Washington or Oregon? I seem to remember the dem losing and demanding a recount because she wanted all of the people heard. She lost the recount, but it was closer. She demanded another recount because she wanted all of the people heard. On the third recount she pulled ahead slightly and declared that the people had spoken.
Logged
“Don’t vote for the person who tells you you deserve something. Just don’t do it if it’s something other than life, liberty, or the pursuit of possible happiness. If everyone is telling you you deserve something, vote for the one who is promising you the least. Be suspicious of the man or woman who tell you deserve everything. Because you don’t.” ---Mike Rowe

Offline thundley4

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 40571
  • Reputation: +2224/-127
Re: New study claims Bush actually won in 2000
« Reply #13 on: November 05, 2015, 04:39:41 PM »
Quote from: ChuckJ on November 05, 2015, 04:21:44 PM
Didn't that happen with the gubernatorial election several years back in Washington or Oregon? I seem to remember the dem losing and demanding a recount because she wanted all of the people heard. She lost the recount, but it was closer. She demanded another recount because she wanted all of the people heard. On the third recount she pulled ahead slightly and declared that the people had spoken.

Isn't that how Al Franken won, too?
Logged

Offline miskie

  • Mailman for the VRWC
  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10461
  • Reputation: +1035/-54
  • Make America Great Again. Deport some DUmmies.
Re: New study claims Bush actually won in 2000
« Reply #14 on: November 05, 2015, 06:09:45 PM »

"Not sure what to think about this. Why all of a sudden is this result being produced?"

It's so obvious, even The Cheat would recognize it. This is to angry all of you lefties up, to make sure you vote for Hillary either out of love, or vengeance. - just as long as you all vote.
Logged

Offline Ken8521

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 304
  • Reputation: +38/-8
  • DeSantis 2024!
Re: New study claims Bush actually won in 2000
« Reply #15 on: November 05, 2015, 06:19:00 PM »
Quote
Response to StrongBad (Original post)

Thu Nov 5, 2015, 01:03 PM

Star Member joeybee12 (52,357 posts)
4. Gore won...the judge in charge of the recount that never happened...

SAid he intended to use a standard that would have shown Gore won...all these hypotheticals about what standard would have been used is just BS to try and blur the fact that Gore won and on December 10, 2000, democracy ceaesed to exist in this country.

What kind of "standard" was he going to use that would have gave the election to Gore?  There should be one standard when tallying the votes after the polls close.  You count the ballots and whatever the ballot say, is what gets done.

These DUmmies are unbelievable.  They just can't get over the fact that Gore LOST.  Then John Kerry got DESTROYED.
Logged

Offline Ptarmigan

  • Bunny Slayer
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 24111
  • Reputation: +1020/-226
  • God Hates Bunnies
Re: New study claims Bush actually won in 2000
« Reply #16 on: November 05, 2015, 09:44:09 PM »
Quote
Thu Nov 5, 2015, 12:57 PM

StrongBad (2,047 posts)

New study claims Bush actually won in 2000
Apparently the newest counting of undervotes puts him on top:

http://www.cnn.com/2015/10/31/politics/bush-gore-2000-election-results-studies/

Not sure what to think about this. Why all of a sudden is this result being produced?

It still shows double vote inclusion going to Gore. So confusing.

Just let it go. 2000 Election is a long time ago. Why does anyone even care now?  :mental:
Logged
Never interrupt your enemy when he is making a mistake.
-Napoleon Bonaparte

Allow enemies their space to hate; they will destroy themselves in the process.
-Lisa Du

Offline obumazombie

  • Siege engine to lib fortresses
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 21814
  • Reputation: +1661/-578
  • Last of the great minorities
Re: New study claims Bush actually won in 2000
« Reply #17 on: November 06, 2015, 03:39:19 PM »
The libs are so malicious and vindictive.
They enjoy the thought that conservatives are suffering under owebuma as much as they suffered having Bush as president.
Logged
There were only two options for gender. At last count there are at least 12, according to libs. By that standard, I'm a male lesbian.
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »