Author Topic: Proglodyte goes there  (Read 869 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline SSG Snuggle Bunny

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 23049
  • Reputation: +2234/-269
  • Voted Rookie-of-the-Year, 3 years running
Proglodyte goes there
« on: July 07, 2015, 10:16:02 AM »
Quote
shaayecanaan (5,946 posts)

Monogamy wasn't invented for the benefit of women
   
it was invented for the benefit of men. Specifically, it was pioneered about three thousand years ago by the Greek city states who found it was necessary, for the sake of social stability, to minimise the number of discontented, socially unattached men. This was best done by maximising each man's prospects of marriage by limiting all men to one wife each. Of course, it was still perfectly fine for men to sleep with other women on the side (and it still is). But such women only had the status of concubines, floozies, prostitutes or slaves. They needed to marry to obtain any sort of station in life.

In a society without any kind of government safety net (which remains the case for three-quarters of humans living today) women typically need to marry in order to survive. Given that men die more often from infant mortality, war and famine, this means that generally women have a relatively limited pool of men from which to make their selection. It also means that in a society with strictly enforced monogamy, every man, no matter how violent or impoverished has a decent shot at obtaining a spouse.

Polygamy naturally affords women a greater variety of choices. A prospective bride doesn't necessarily have to resign herself to being the first wife of a destitute and desperate alcoholic if she has the alternative of becoming the second or third wife of a more stable and prosperous partner. It also means that in the event of war or famine depleting the pool of available men, that a woman will not necessarily have to resign herself to a life of solitude on society's margins. It is for these reasons that even the mainline Christian churches in Africa endorse polygamy, realising that it is the only viable social solution for these women.

Polygamy also tends to function as a crude form of socialism. It enables the more prosperous to have more children, which results in wealth being divided amongst more people and a tendency to avoid the over-concentration of wealth that has occurred in western societies. 

So there you have it...

Women were meant to be kept, if not by men then by The State...which is presumably run by men.

 :fuelfire:


http://www.democraticunderground.com/10026946367
According to the Bible, "know" means "yes."

Offline Big Dog

  • ^^Smokes cigars and knows things.
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 15581
  • Reputation: +1954/-213
Re: Proglodyte goes there
« Reply #1 on: July 07, 2015, 10:28:30 AM »
Polygamyy = socialism.

That should convince 'em!
Government is the negation of liberty.
  -Ludwig von Mises

CAVE FVROREM PATIENTIS.

Offline Carl

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 19742
  • Reputation: +1491/-100
Re: Proglodyte goes there
« Reply #2 on: July 07, 2015, 10:38:46 AM »
My general experience is that less then 1% of the female population will accept polygamy in practice.

Offline BannedFromDU

  • Gyro Member
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6126
  • Reputation: +1522/-166
  • Nothing personal.
Re: Proglodyte goes there
« Reply #3 on: July 07, 2015, 11:11:30 AM »
My general experience is that less then 1% of the female population will knowingly accept polygamy in practice.

FIFY
NJCher (31,658 posts)

5. IMO

a certain percentage of DU is depressed and has other mental issues.

Offline Carl

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 19742
  • Reputation: +1491/-100
Re: Proglodyte goes there
« Reply #4 on: July 07, 2015, 11:20:44 AM »
FIFY

True on that,polygamy is definitely a hedonistic benefit to men and virtually nothing for women except as was said in the op...a way for her to be kept.

Offline JohnnyReb

  • In Memoriam
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 32063
  • Reputation: +1997/-134
Re: Proglodyte goes there
« Reply #5 on: July 07, 2015, 11:43:44 AM »
Then why do some women on the government tit have a half dozen kids by a half dozen different dads?....and some dads have a half dozen kids the don't support by a half dozen different women?
“The American people will never knowingly adopt socialism. But, under the name of ‘liberalism’, they will adopt every fragment of the socialist program, until one day America will be a socialist nation, without knowing how it happened.” - Norman Thomas, U.S. Socialist Party presidential candidate 1940, 1944 and 1948

"America is like a healthy body and its resistance is threefold: its patriotism, its morality, and its spiritual life. If we can undermine these three areas, America will collapse from within."  Stalin

Offline 67 Rover

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5827
  • Reputation: +1267/-41
Re: Proglodyte goes there
« Reply #6 on: July 07, 2015, 12:17:11 PM »
Quote
shaayecanaan (5,946 posts)

Monogamy wasn't invented for the benefit of women
   
it was invented for the benefit of men. Specifically, it was pioneered about three thousand years ago by the Greek city states who found it was necessary, for the sake of social stability, to minimise the number of discontented, socially unattached men. This was best done by maximising each man's prospects of marriage by limiting all men to one wife each. Of course, it was still perfectly fine for men to sleep with other women on the side (and it still is). But such women only had the status of concubines, floozies, prostitutes or slaves. They needed to marry to obtain any sort of station in life.

In a society without any kind of government safety net (which remains the case for three-quarters of humans living today) women typically need to marry in order to survive. Given that men die more often from infant mortality, war and famine, this means that generally women have a relatively limited pool of men from which to make their selection. It also means that in a society with strictly enforced monogamy, every man, no matter how violent or impoverished has a decent shot at obtaining a spouse.

Polygamy naturally affords women a greater variety of choices. A prospective bride doesn't necessarily have to resign herself to being the first wife of a destitute and desperate alcoholic if she has the alternative of becoming the second or third wife of a more stable and prosperous partner. It also means that in the event of war or famine depleting the pool of available men, that a woman will not necessarily have to resign herself to a life of solitude on society's margins. It is for these reasons that even the mainline Christian churches in Africa endorse polygamy, realising that it is the only viable social solution for these women.

Polygamy also tends to function as a crude form of socialism. It enables the more prosperous to have more children, which results in wealth being divided amongst more people and a tendency to avoid the over-concentration of wealth that has occurred in western societies. 


Discontented, socially unattached men need sammiches made too.  :drool:
NRA Benefactor member
G.O.A. Life member
G.O.A.L. Life member
Certified Law Enforcement Sig Armorer

Offline USA4ME

  • Evil Capitalist
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 14601
  • Reputation: +2298/-76
Re: Proglodyte goes there
« Reply #7 on: July 07, 2015, 04:24:09 PM »
Polygamyy = socialism.

That should convince 'em!

They shouldn't need to be convinced. Expanding the definition of marriage to be as many people who want to be involved is a foundation of liberal ideology. They told us those same concepts about twinkie marriage.

Those libs who are against it are only doing so in order to save face from those of us who told them about the slippery slope they were on opening up marriage to involve twinkies.

.
« Last Edit: July 07, 2015, 10:08:37 PM by USA4ME »
Because third world peasant labor is a good thing.

Offline 98ZJUSMC

  • The Most Deplorable
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8424
  • Reputation: +436/-76
  • Now, with 99% less yellow!
Re: Proglodyte goes there
« Reply #8 on: July 07, 2015, 04:25:23 PM »
Quote
Polygamy also tends to function as a crude form of socialism.

              

Liberal thinking is a two-legged stool and magical thinking is one of the legs, the other is a combination of self-loating and misanthropy.  To understand it, you would have to be able to sit on that stool while juggling two elephants, an anvil and a fragmentation grenade, sans pin.

"Accuse others of what you do." - Karl Marx

Offline obumazombie

  • Siege engine to lib fortresses
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 21814
  • Reputation: +1659/-578
  • Last of the great minorities
Re: Proglodyte goes there
« Reply #9 on: July 07, 2015, 09:58:10 PM »
My general experience is that less then 1% of the female population will accept polygamy in practice.

You could sweeten the offer.
I can't wait for the perverts to start banging the drum for gay polygamy.
They deserve what they have wrought.
There were only two options for gender. At last count there are at least 12, according to libs. By that standard, I'm a male lesbian.

Offline jukin

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 15765
  • Reputation: +1737/-170
Re: Proglodyte goes there
« Reply #10 on: July 08, 2015, 03:11:11 PM »
Quote
Monogamy wasn't invented for the benefit of women

Complete BS. Monogamy is a huge plus for women. Otherwise the man leaves the woman with the kid(s). For example see black community. Also a huge benefit for the kids.

99 out of 100 times the DUchebags will not just be wrong but wildly wrong. That 1/100 time the DUchebag is right but for the wrong reasons.
When you are the beneficiary of someone’s kindness and generosity, it produces a sense of gratitude and community.

When you are the beneficiary of a policy that steals from someone and gives it to you in return for your vote, it produces a sense of entitlement and dependency.

Offline catsmtrods

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2216
  • Reputation: +229/-24
Re: Proglodyte goes there
« Reply #11 on: July 08, 2015, 05:40:18 PM »
bend over, bitch
"Liberalism is an essentially feminine, submissive world view. Perhaps a better adjective than feminine is infantile. It is the world view of men who do not have the moral toughness, the spiritual strength to stand up and do single combat with life, who cannot adjust to the reality that the world is not a huge, pink-and-blue, padded nursery in which the lions lie down with the lambs and everyone lives happily ever after."


~ Dr. William Pierce


 

"How many more times are we going to cower under tables and chairs, whimpering like mindless dogs, thinking that someone else has the responsibility to save and protect us?"