FBI Won't Call SC Terrorism; DU HOWLS. Entertaining.

[BannedFromDU]

Star Member LovingA2andMI (1,321 posts)

FBI director: Charleston shooting not an act of terrorism [View all]
Source: ABC3340.com - Central Alabama News

FBI director James Comey said Friday that while his agency is investigating the murder of nine people in Charleston, S.C. as a hate crime, it is not an act of terrorism.

He said due to the lack of political motivation for his actions, alleged shooter Dylann Roof is not a domestic terrorist.

"Terrorism is act of violence done or threatens to in order to try to influence a public body or citizenry so it's more of a political act and again based on what I know so more I don't see it as a political act. Doesn't make it any less horrific the label but terrorism has a definition under federal law," he said during a visit to Baltimore.

Read more: http://www.abc3340.com/story/29368499/fbi-director-charleston-shooting-not-an-act-of-terrorism

DU is absolutely fascinated with the descriptor "terrorism". Whenever a white person commits so much as a misdemeanor that makes the news, they howl that it's "terrorism." Gee, I wonder if there have been any comparable events in recent US history that might, you know, expose the rank hypocrisy of the DUmmies. For the millionth time, I mean.

Remember the Fort Hood MURDERS, DUmbasses? I sure do. And looky what I found:


baldguy (33,624 posts)
9. Was Nidal Hasan called a terrorist? Yes, he was.

Was the Ft. Hood shooting terrorism? No, it was not - in spite of what the corporate-owned RW MSM would have you believe.

Why not? Why, because DU SAYS so (and lurking massive faggot Buzz Clik: exactly zero DUmmies disagreed with the above).

Unmoved? OK:

whatchamacallit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore    Tue Nov-10-09 04:16 PM
Original message
If you believe Major Hasan was a terrorist, I've got some WMD I'd like to sell ya
   
After a decade of sexed-up "intelligence", you'd think people could tell when they're being played. Oh well...

How about a third:

hayu_lol Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore    Wed Nov-25-09 11:41 AM
Response to Original message
3. Seems to me that this trial, military or civilian, should be a public...
   
affair available on television worldwide. This man is not a terrorist, he is merely a religious zealot.

And another:

Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore    Tue Nov-10-09 04:21 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. All of that and likely insane, to boot. Just not a terrorist.
   
The Islamic extremists seem to have picked up on what the army missed: the man was crazy.



Here's the point, morons: today's thread is 100% in favor of calling the kid a "terrorist." No dissent. None of the "nuance" DU brags about when something inconvenient happens, like the Fort Hood terror attack (oops, "workplace violence"). When Hasan went crazy, MANY MANY DUmmies insisted it was IN NO WAY terrorism. And I found NO debate about that in the records.

Let's recap:

Hasan shoots up Fort Hood and kills more than that kid killed, after yelling Allahu Akhbar, but in no way is that terrorism.

This kid shoots up a church in a clear case of racial animus, but that IS terrorism?

Only on DU.

Don't even make me remind you assholes about  Seung-Hui Cho, who wasn't considered a terrorist on DU until people connected to the Bush Admin said there were no terror attacks on US soil after 9/11.

This is why you stupid morons aren't in charge of anything, including your own lives. You're craven morons. As the violent Will Pitt says: FULL STOP.

[Fourwinds]

Now they know how we feel about the Ft. Hood massacre.

[thundley4]

Compare an contrast two mass murder events in the US.

The Fort Hood shooting. Nidal Malik Hasan, shouted Allahu Akbar before killing and injuring dozens of soldiers on a military base. The left downplayed the part Islam played in it and preferred to call it workplace violence.
  Their biggest fear was a backlash against other Muslims in this country.

Charleston, SC. The left is quick to call it a terrorist attack, and to blame all white people for the actions of one crazy racist asshole. It's almost like the left wants to instigate revenge attacks against white people.

Fortunately, the caring and loving people are having none of what the race-baiting left is offering, and are calling for calm and forgiveness, not more violence.

[CollectivismMustDie]

The same DU that between 2000 and 2008 accused the administration of using "terrorism" to justify anything under the sun? The same DU that can't forget about accusing that administration of "war crimes"?

What conveniently selective little memories they have.


CMD

[SVPete]

It's Obama's and Holder's FBI. They should take their whines to the White House. You know ... OWN IT!

[98ZJUSMC]

Good job! 

[RayRaytheSBS]

DU is absolutely fascinated with the descriptor "terrorism". Whenever a white person commits so much as a misdemeanor that makes the news, they howl that it's "terrorism." Gee, I wonder if there have been any comparable events in recent US history that might, you know, expose the rank hypocrisy of the DUmmies. For the millionth time, I mean.

Remember the Fort Hood MURDERS, DUmbasses? I sure do. And looky what I found:


baldguy (33,624 posts)
9. Was Nidal Hasan called a terrorist? Yes, he was.

Was the Ft. Hood shooting terrorism? No, it was not - in spite of what the corporate-owned RW MSM would have you believe.

Why not? Why, because DU SAYS so (and lurking massive faggot Buzz Clik: exactly zero DUmmies disagreed with the above).

Unmoved? OK:

whatchamacallit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore    Tue Nov-10-09 04:16 PM
Original message
If you believe Major Hasan was a terrorist, I've got some WMD I'd like to sell ya
   
After a decade of sexed-up "intelligence", you'd think people could tell when they're being played. Oh well...

How about a third:

hayu_lol Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore    Wed Nov-25-09 11:41 AM
Response to Original message
3. Seems to me that this trial, military or civilian, should be a public...
   
affair available on television worldwide. This man is not a terrorist, he is merely a religious zealot.

And another:

Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore    Tue Nov-10-09 04:21 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. All of that and likely insane, to boot. Just not a terrorist.
   
The Islamic extremists seem to have picked up on what the army missed: the man was crazy.



Here's the point, morons: today's thread is 100% in favor of calling the kid a "terrorist." No dissent. None of the "nuance" DU brags about when something inconvenient happens, like the Fort Hood terror attack (oops, "workplace violence"). When Hasan went crazy, MANY MANY DUmmies insisted it was IN NO WAY terrorism. And I found NO debate about that in the records.

Let's recap:

Hasan shoots up Fort Hood and kills more than that kid killed, after yelling Allahu Akhbar, but in no way is that terrorism.

This kid shoots up a church in a clear case of racial animus, but that IS terrorism?

Only on DU.

Don't even make me remind you assholes about  Seung-Hui Cho, who wasn't considered a terrorist on DU until people connected to the Bush Admin said there were no terror attacks on US soil after 9/11.

This is why you stupid morons aren't in charge of anything, including your own lives. You're craven morons. As the violent Will Pitt says: FULL STOP.

Oh by the way lurking DUches, you don't even have the 'workplace violence' meme to fall back on. They don't give purple hearts for 'workplace violence' http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2015/04/10/fort-hood-shooting-victims-receive-purple-heart-awards/

Funny how the adminstration tried to keep THAT one quiet.