Nutcase nadin Lectures On Primaries (Again), And Introduces A New nadinism

[GOBUCKS]

Wed May 13, 2015, 02:58 PM
nadinbrzezinski (136,744 posts)

Imagine a Primary Season where voters actually hear from all qualified candidates

let me take you back to 2007. Back then we had a small, vocal, group of supporters of one candidate telling us why that candidate was the best ever.

Then something curious happened on the way to the forum... we had first one, then two, then three others declare.

blah, blah, blah...

Yet we also had posts that told us how the rest of the field, in particular one of them, was unelectable. We also started to see something else, how NADER ruined it all for Gore. It was kind of textbooks.

We are following the precise same story line right at the moment.

To be frank, I don't care who emerges from the primary season.

But there are a few things that should be clear from US Political history in the modern period.

blah, blah, blah...

So, at this point seeing the same exact story line as deployed in 2007 is kind of cute, and very amusing, but just cute. I hope candidates run a muscular, very strong, issues based campaign. That is what Americans should be hoping for. There is nothing short than climate change, and economic stagnation in our futures.

In the meantime, back to work with me, speaking of issues... quite frankly these attacks as unelectable, or NADER, are quite unimpressive, and boring. The fear campaign is even less so.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/10026666792

Wed May 13, 2015, 03:09 PM
Star Member Agschmid (13,645 posts)
6. Determining whether Vermin Supreme is qualified to be President...

I think most of us can figure that one out for ourselves?

Response to Agschmid
Wed May 13, 2015, 03:14 PM
nadinbrzezinski (136,744 posts)
8. I think that you are ignoring the constitution at your peril

being qualified for president is a constitutional test.

For example, I am not a qualified candidate for the Presidency of the United States. I am not a natural born citizen. So if I went to the FEC and filed, they would laugh, properly so, in my general direction.

I will repeat what I said in the OP, I don't give two shits who emerges from the contest. I reached that state of zen a while ago, where I am back in Mexico where YOU ARE TOLD WHO TO VOTE FOR and you'll like it.

The birth of a new nadinism:

Wed May 13, 2015, 03:20 PM
nadinbrzezinski (136,744 posts)


The problem I am having is that people are stuck in NOT having a primary, but rather a detape and dedazo. I know we are close to that, but still. Let me still enjoy the illusion that there are TWO candidates for POTUS, both serious, in the Democratic party right at this moment.

We are stuck in both a detape AND a dedazo!! What?

Response to nadinbrzezinski
Wed May 13, 2015, 03:18 PM
Star Member Agschmid (13,645 posts)
12. Yes we both get that.

But again Vermin Supreme, I expect he will be at the national debates... It seems to be what you are suggesting.

Response to Agschmid
Wed May 13, 2015, 03:23 PM
nadinbrzezinski (136,744 posts)
16. If you read that, it is due to my poor communication skills

I wil try to make it damn clear right now for you.

At the moment we have TWO, that is TWO candidates who are serious for the Presidency of the US on the Democratic Ballot. We might still get more. Both are SERIOUS candidates.

We have 17 on the Republican side... I expect that to go down to 10 by the time of the first debate,

We will have a candidate from minor parties who have not been invited to Presidential debates in decades. I do not see that changing anytime soon, since none of them will be qualified in all individual state contests. There are many reasons for that. They are problematic, but I do not see that changing anytime soon.

We have 50 state elections, not one national election.

Is this clear enough for you, or shall I write it further down?

Another nut shows up:

Wed May 13, 2015, 03:39 PM
Angry Dragon (24,153 posts)
21. I think it should be time for ALL politicians

to have to have a license to run for office

One needs a license to cut hair but not one to decide the fate of millions

Wed May 13, 2015, 03:49 PM
Angry Dragon (24,153 posts)
25. There would be tests ...lots of tests

Nutcase nadin explains Nader and the 2000 election:      

Wed May 13, 2015, 05:03 PM
nadinbrzezinski (136,744 posts)
34. Whether right or wrong in your view he had a right

to run as the candidate of the Green Party.

Your **** Nader school ignores the actual RW coup that happened. I will not bother posting AGAIN, all the details of that coup. Suffice to say, that NOT learning from that coup, makes it very possible to be done again. It was in many respects, old CIA tricks used in places like El Salvador and Guatemala in the past and included CIA retired operatives. Now that was the piece d'resistance to be honest.

au cntrainere

[Carl]

Yeah DUmbasses,that kind of idiocy and lunacy is all yours.

[GOBUCKS]

You know you're in trouble when you're stuck in both a detape and a dedazo.

[FlippyDoo]

    Wed May 13, 2015, 03:20 PM
    nadinbrzezinski (136,744 posts)


    The problem I am having is that people are stuck in NOT having a primary, but rather a detape and dedazo. I know we are close to that, but still. Let me still enjoy the illusion that there are TWO candidates for POTUS, both serious, in the Democratic party right at this moment.

I think this is a case of nads showing her versatility by being atrocious at two languages simultaneously.

I checked the Spanish-to-English Bing Translator and "detape" returns as "uncover" and "dedazo" returns as "handpick". Just keep in mind that Bing has not yet released the Nadinese-to-English Translator so "detape" could be what holds together deplane and "dedazo" could be one of the DUmmies claiming to be disabled.

[obumazombie]

Vermin Supreme ?
Any dem candidate fits that bill.