Author Topic: DUmmies Discuss The 2000 Election, nadin Demonstrates Ignorance  (Read 1743 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline GOBUCKS

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 24186
  • Reputation: +1812/-339
  • All in all, not bad, not bad at all
Quote
Wed May 13, 2015, 01:16 PM
Backwoodsrider (100 posts)

Sanders might do to Hillary what Nader did to Gore in 2000


I am telling you I have seen this game before.

"In the 2000 presidential election in Florida, George W. Bush defeated Al Gore by 537 votes. Nader received 97,421 votes, which led to claims that he was responsible for Gore's defeat. Nader, both in his book Crashing the Party and on his website, states: "In the year 2000, exit polls reported that 25% of my voters would have voted for Bush, 38% would have voted for Gore and the rest would not have voted at all." Michael Moore at first argued that Florida was so close that votes for any of seven other candidates could also have switched the results, but in 2004 joined the view that Nader had helped make Bush president. When asked about claims of being a spoiler, Nader typically points to the controversial Supreme Court ruling that halted a Florida recount, Gore's loss in his home state of Tennessee, and the "quarter million Democrats who voted for Bush in Florida."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ralph_Nader#2000

I don't think for a second that Sanders is going to get elected in 2016, not after claiming for years that he was a socialist so what is he doing right now? He is stealing the fire from Hillary just like Nader did to Gore in 2000 but sucking in many of the motivated young people and money and TV time that could be used to attack the right but instead he is using them to attack Hillary. I don't know what is motivating Sanders but I am going to suspect he has a problem with authority and see's Hillary as fruit ripe for the picking. You don't think he is motivated by ego google 'sanders angry response'.

No I don't think Hillary is perfect but she is the best we got. Or we could join a losing cause and possibly get the GOP candidate elected and those suckers are crazy!
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10026666147

      
Quote
Wed May 13, 2015, 01:19 PM
morningfog (10,835 posts)
2. Gore won. Bush stole it.

And more Dems voted for Bush than the differential of the first count, some 40 times over.

This is a lazy, dribbling OP.


I challenge anyone to translate the nadinese in this post:
Quote
Wed May 13, 2015, 01:30 PM
nadinbrzezinski (136,722 posts)
20. El dedazo y el destape

no wonder I see PRI insignia everywhere, oh wait. That tricolor is red white and blue, not red white and green.

Some people though would prefer that...I suspect.


And now, the nutcase demonstrates her ignorance of primary vs. nomination:
Quote
Wed May 13, 2015, 01:28 PM
nadinbrzezinski (136,722 posts)
17. Odd given that Sanders is running for the democratic primary.

I did not realize Nader ran for the Democratic primary in 2000...oh wait, he did not.

Nice adorable try though.


Quote
Wed May 13, 2015, 01:31 PM
greenman3610 (3,213 posts)
22. I still remember "There's not a dimes worth of difference between Al Gore and George Bush"

thanks for 8 years of hell, death destruction, and Citizen's United, Nader voters!!!

You should also thank the idiots who voted for Ross Perot, and gave us eight years of Willy and the Hildebeast.

Without Perot we would have no Hildebeast today.

Offline Chris_

  • Little Lebowski Urban Achiever
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 46845
  • Reputation: +2028/-266
Re: DUmmies Discuss The 2000 Election, nadin Demonstrates Ignorance
« Reply #1 on: May 13, 2015, 02:41:44 PM »
Quote
El dedazo y el destape
Quote
The handpick and the uncover
:mental:
If you want to worship an orange pile of garbage with a reckless disregard for everything, get on down to Arbys & try our loaded curly fries.

Offline Gina

  • Tinker Twat
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13088
  • Reputation: +830/-102
  • Short Bus bound!
Re: DUmmies Discuss The 2000 Election, nadin Demonstrates Ignorance
« Reply #2 on: May 13, 2015, 02:44:03 PM »
 :rotf: Oh gNat!  you never fail to entertain.






"An army of deer led by a lion is more to be feared than an army of lions led by a deer." Phillip of Macedonia, father to Alexander.

Offline thundley4

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 40571
  • Reputation: +2224/-127
Re: DUmmies Discuss The 2000 Election, nadin Demonstrates Ignorance
« Reply #3 on: May 13, 2015, 02:46:05 PM »
Quote
And now, the nutcase demonstrates her ignorance of primary vs. nomination:
Quote
Wed May 13, 2015, 01:28 PM
nadinbrzezinski (136,722 posts)
17. Odd given that Sanders is running for the democratic primary.

I did not realize Nader ran for the Democratic primary in 2000...oh wait, he did not.

Nice adorable try though.

For a change, gNads is right. Bernie is running as a democrat for the democrat nomination. If Hillary beats him there, he won't be running against her in the general election. The OP expressing concern that Sanders could do the same as Nader did, is totally misplaced.

Offline BlueStateSaint

  • Here I come to save the day, because I'm a
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 32553
  • Reputation: +1560/-191
  • RIP FDNY Lt. Rich Nappi d. 4/16/12
Re: DUmmies Discuss The 2000 Election, nadin Demonstrates Ignorance
« Reply #4 on: May 13, 2015, 03:46:14 PM »
For a change, gNads is right. Bernie is running as a democrat for the democrat nomination. If Hillary beats him there, he won't be running against her in the general election. The OP expressing concern that Sanders could do the same as Nader did, is totally misplaced.

Let them go . . . :whistling:
"Timid men prefer the calm of despotism to the tempestuous sea of Liberty." - Thomas Jefferson

"All you have to do is look straight and see the road, and when you see it, don't sit looking at it - walk!" -Ayn Rand
 
"Those that trust God with their safety must yet use proper means for their safety, otherwise they tempt Him, and do not trust Him.  God will provide, but so must we also." - Matthew Henry, Commentary on 2 Chronicles 32, from Matthew Henry's Commentary on the Whole Bible

"These anti-gun fools are more dangerous to liberty than street criminals or foreign spies."--Theodore Haas, Dachau Survivor

Chase her.
Chase her even when she's yours.
That's the only way you'll be assured to never lose her.

Offline SVPete

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 29634
  • Reputation: +3297/-248
Re: DUmmies Discuss The 2000 Election, nadin Demonstrates Ignorance
« Reply #5 on: May 13, 2015, 03:59:14 PM »
What's with "adorable"? A Malaprop? Some sort of personal snip at a fellow DU-member?
If The Vaccine is deadly as anti-Covid-vaxxers claim, millions now living would have died.

Offline JakeStyle

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3146
  • Reputation: +359/-39
Re: DUmmies Discuss The 2000 Election, nadin Demonstrates Ignorance
« Reply #6 on: May 13, 2015, 04:01:37 PM »
What's with "adorable"? A Malaprop? Some sort of personal snip at a fellow DU-member?

It's just her latest way of being condescending to the other DUmmies; they are all cute and adorable, while her opinions are above reproach.

Offline Big Dog

  • ^^Smokes cigars and knows things.
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 15581
  • Reputation: +1954/-213
Re: DUmmies Discuss The 2000 Election, nadin Demonstrates Ignorance
« Reply #7 on: May 13, 2015, 06:10:56 PM »
It's just her latest way of being condescending to the other DUmmies; they are all cute and adorable, while her opinions are above reproach.

It's the Mexi-Polush version of 'Now, ain't that special?'
Government is the negation of liberty.
  -Ludwig von Mises

CAVE FVROREM PATIENTIS.

Offline obumazombie

  • Siege engine to lib fortresses
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 21814
  • Reputation: +1661/-578
  • Last of the great minorities
Re: DUmmies Discuss The 2000 Election, nadin Demonstrates Ignorance
« Reply #8 on: May 13, 2015, 11:14:49 PM »
It's just her latest way of being condescending to the other DUmmies; they are all cute and adorable, while her opinions are above reproach.

I wanted to comment very similarly, but...GMTA.
There were only two options for gender. At last count there are at least 12, according to libs. By that standard, I'm a male lesbian.