Need help, please. Knuckle-dragger husband of a friend of mine sent me this:

[dutch508]

The smartest people on the interwebs always seen to need help fighting back against the knuckle-dragging retardicans...

calimary (37,025 posts) http://www.democraticunderground.com/10026099492

Need help, please. Knuckle-dragger husband of a friend of mine sent me this:

http://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2015/01/was-2014-really-the-warmest-year-ever.php

Claiming to look at ice samples and other "records" of eons ago: "Rebuttal to yesterday's articles in many newspapers. Personally, I am more impressed by data from twelve thousand year old ice core samples than temperatures gathered from the year 1880. Again the global alarmists are foiled by facts."

I clicked on the link...

"The Earth’s actual temperatures over the last two decades, even as measured by NOAA and NASA, have been well outside the bounds of the models’ predictions. This is why IPCC, the United Nations’ organization of global warming lobbyists, downgraded its temperature predictions in its most recent report. The models have failed.

The bottom line is, don’t buy the hype. The real scientists are not the politically-motivated hysterics."

This dude is such a Neanderthal that one of his recent emails - when you clicked on it - showed either a very well-drawn or photographed gun - pointed directly at you. You were literally looking down the barrel of it. I was so horrified I deleted it before even attempting to read further. This guy disgusts me. I'm glad to say that when they come down to L.A. (they live in Alaska), he despises me so much he refuses to accompany his wife (my friend) when she walks up to our house to stop in for a minute. Won't even deal with me. That's okay, I don't WANT his ass in my house or anywhere near me! They share a single email address so there's no way I can communicate with her without him seeing it. A REAL Creep. He makes teabaggers look like normal, reasonable, sentient beings. He makes ted cruz look like Albert Schweitzer and michele bachmann look like Mother Teresa. I'm afraid I won't be seeing much of my friend anymore. She's pretty well infected, and since her remaining family members have moved out of the area, there's no reason for her to come visiting in the old neighborhood anymore. I regret that, but I'm feeling at this point that it's just gonna have to be a write-off. I can't reach her, and as long as she stays with him, she's infected with that mindset. He's a SCARY guy.

Just wanted to give you guys a heads-up of how the Dark Side is attempting to beat back the increasing evidence and reporting about the REALITY of climate change.

And I would appreciate some rebuttals to this too. I noticed that they do link to other "brainiacs" like hugh hewitt, michelle malkin, Pox Noise, and the Weekly Standard among others. Birds of a feather.

 
First off... You were so scared of an e-mail picture of drawing of a gun you wouldn't couldn't read the e-mail... Holy ****ing shit, Batman. How big of a ****ing ***** do you have to be to be scared of an e-mail with a gun picture in it!

Sounds like he know's exactly how to **** with you. I am suprised your friend even talks with your faming liberal ass.

gratuitous (50,427 posts)
2. My two cents, for what it's worth. Keep e-mailing your friend, knowing that Hubby Meathead is also reading. Tailor part of your message to his knuckle-headedness. Ain't no law against having some fun at his expense.

Sounds like she is getting her ass kicked in the e-mail war. Maybe start sending pictures of white healing lights with hands...

Botany (38,582 posts)
4. The science is done

http://www.grida.no/publications/vg/climate/page/3057.aspx

end of story

BTW you might ask him if he ever took a chemistry class because on of the
universal gas laws that is >200 years old shows that the more CO2 in a body
of gas the more heat that body of gas will hold. I think it is either Boyle's or
Charles Law and it has never been shown wrong.

send em this movie ... a must see
http://play.starflixmovie.com/play.php?movie=1579361

Although one problem is that because of their political and or religious thoughts
some people will never believe in climate change until their world ends.

CLIMATE CHANGE!!!! AHHHH!!!!


****ing retards.

pamela (2,588 posts)
10. Ignore it.

Why engage with someone like that at all? You could give him irrefutable proof that everything he said is wrong and he would ignore it and just move onto the next ignorant thing to send you. Ignore it. Delete it. Ignore him.

I would also send your friend an invitation to her own gmail account and let her know that you will be blocking the joint account. 

You should ignore it... but you are a DUmpmonkey and you can't help yourself.

[landofconfusion80]

First off... You were so scared of an e-mail picture of drawing of a gun you wouldn't couldn't read the e-mail... Holy ****ing shit, Batman. How big of a ****ing ***** do you have to be to be scared of an e-mail with a gun picture in it!

Well, to be fair, it was big, black, had a massive  clip magazine and looked pretty scary

[Carl]

The ones who are desperate seem to be the ones that have financially and politically wedded themselves to the cult of gloBULL warming.

[miskie]

This doesn't surprise me.

I wish I had posted this here, (or If I did, I can't find it.) But I made the prediction that the warmists would find a way to declare the world hotter than ever after the so-called 'polar vortex' -

And here we are, almost exactly a year later, and the world is warmer than ever. 

[docstew]

I just had to grab this one, since it is so completely ludicrous and worthy of all possible derision:

Botany (38,582 posts)
4. The science is done

http://www.grida.no/publications/vg/climate/page/3057.aspx

end of story

BTW you might ask him if he ever took a chemistry class because on of the
universal gas laws that is >200 years old shows that the more CO2 in a body
of gas the more heat that body of gas will hold. I think it is either Boyle's or
Charles Law and it has never been shown wrong.

send em this movie ... a must see
http://play.starflixmovie.com/play.php?movie=1579361

Although one problem is that because of their political and or religious thoughts
some people will never believe in climate change until their world ends.

NOWHERE in the "universal gas laws" is there even a mention of carbon dioxide. In fact, I do believe that, by definition, a "universal gas law" that talked about a specific gas would no longer be universal. And these people, term used very loosely, claim to be our intellectual superiors.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gas_laws

[SSG Snuggle Bunny]

TRANSLATION: My pre-programmed worldview has been challenged. Quick! Somebody tell me what to think!

[miskie]

I just had to grab this one, since it is so completely ludicrous and worthy of all possible derision:
NOWHERE in the "universal gas laws" is there even a mention of carbon dioxide. In fact, I do believe that, by definition, a "universal gas law" that talked about a specific gas would no longer be universal. And these people, term used very loosely, claim to be our intellectual superiors.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gas_laws

I think the DUmbass is practicing the chemistry equivalent of potatonomics.

After giving this some thought, I think the DUmmy is trying to say that the increase of gasses in the atmosphere can result in an increase of temperature, since the atmosphere is (more or less) a closed system. But the primitive forgets that the system isn't closed as tightly as they would think.

CO2 displaces the much lighter Nitrogen, which ends up in the soil, restoring atmospheric pressure. - Nitrogen is a primary plant fertilizer, which helps to stimulate plant growth. The increase in plant life decreases the CO2 in the atmosphere during daylight hours as the plants absorb the carbon for growth and release oxygen. - returning the carbon to the earth.

[Delmar]

Response to calimary (Original post)Sun Jan 18, 2015, 01:03 AM
pamela (2,588 posts)
10. Ignore it.

Why engage with someone like that at all? You could give him irrefutable proof that everything he said is wrong and he would ignore it and just move onto the next ignorant thing to send you. Ignore it. Delete it. Ignore him.

I would also send your friend an invitation to her own gmail account and let her know that you will be blocking the joint account.

You could give him irrefutable proof--too bad there isn't any, DUmmy.

[DumbAss Tanker]

If you'd rather trust back-projection of models with no track record of accuracy using uncooked data, over actual physical samples from ice-cores, you need a new logic unit, not help arguing with people whose units are still functioning normally.

[Movie buff- The Sequel]

"This dude is such a Neanderthal that one of his recent emails - when you clicked on it - showed either a very well-drawn or photographed gun - pointed directly at you."
That's funny. I was unaware that Neanderthals still existed, let alone were apparently gun enthusiasts.

"You were literally looking down the barrel of it. I was so horrified I deleted it before even attempting to read further."
Seriously? What a chicken!

"I don't WANT his ass in my house or anywhere near me!"
Oh, I see. Being a tolerant liberal, you don't want to associate with "Those kinds of people." Hypocritical vermin.

"Just wanted to give you guys a heads-up of how the Dark Side is attempting to beat back the increasing evidence and reporting about the REALITY of climate change."
You still call it "Climate change"? You haven't gone back to "Global warming" or "Global cooling" or one of the other buzzwords that the Left has to swap out every few months or so, so they don't look like idiots when the weather catastrophes they shriek about never actually happen?

[Karin]

OH MY GOD!  There's a picture of a gun in this thread!!!    I cannot cope.

Tailor part of your message to his knuckle-headedness. Ain't no law against having some fun at his expense.

This would require a subtlety not in Calimary's capabilities.

 

[Tess Anderson]

So a self-described "a veteran broadcaster ad five-time Golden Mike Award winner, who has anchored, reported, and written for the Associated Press Radio Network, NBC Radio "The Source," and many Los Angeles-area stations including KRTH-FM/AM, KLOS-FM, KFWB-AM, and KTLA-TV, and occasional media analyst for ABC Radio News. She began her career as a liberal activist with the Student Coalition for Humphrey/Muskie in 1968, and helped spearhead a regional campaign, "The Power 18," to win the right to vote for 18-year-olds. She remains an advocate for liberal causes, responsibility and accountability in media, environmental education and support of the arts for children, and green living" can't even write her own talking points?

[Big Dog]

OH MY GOD!  There's a picture of a gun in this thread!!!    I cannot cope.

This would require a subtlety not in Calimary's  capabilities.

I just noticed her DU name. Squid Woman!

[freedumb2003b]

I just noticed her DU name. Squid Woman!

Much better like this:

[I_B_Perky]

Hey dummie? You do realize that we are talking about a hundredth of a degree separating 2014 from the last hottest year on record? You don't? Maybe it is because the lamestream media kindly ignored that little fact.

You do realize that not all scientists agree with the methodology that was used to come up with the hottest year on record claim?

Read the truth:

"Even former NASA global warming chief scientist  James Hansen, the leading proponent of man-made global warming in the U.S., conceded in 2011 that the “hottest year” rankings are essentially meaningless. Hansen explained that 2010 differed from 2005 by less than 2 hundredths of a degree F (that’s 0.018F). “It’s not particularly important whether 2010, 2005, or 1998 was the hottest year on record,” Hansen admitted on January 13."

"Climatologist Dr. Judith Curry, former chair of the school of earth and atmospheric sciences at Georgia Institute of Technology, had this to say about 2014 being the ‘hottest year’: “The ‘warmest year’ is noticeably missing in the satellite data sets of lower atmospheric temperatures,” Curry wrote on January 16"

"Climatologist Dr. John Christy, professor of atmospheric sciences, University of Alabama-Huntsville, noted satellites do not agree with “warmest year” claims. “The satellite and balloon data of the deep atmosphere have 2014 in a cluster of warmish years well below the hottest two of 1998 and 2010″, Christy said.

Christy continued: “With the government agencies reporting that the surface temperature as highest ever, we have a puzzle. The puzzle is even more puzzling because theory (i.e. models) indicate the opposite should be occurring – greater warmth in the deep atmosphere than the surface. So, there are just many very basic and fundamental aspects of the global climate we have yet to comprehend.”

http://www.climatedepot.com/2015/01/16/scientists-balk-at-hottest-year-claims-we-are-arguing-over-the-significance-of-hundredths-of-a-degree-the-pause-continues/

[Carl]

Does anyone not think for a moment that a year from now 2015 will be declared the warmest ever?
The UN wants 100-500 billion dollars PER year for its so called climate fund.
There are literally trillions of dollars in play and those pushing the scam are all in on it while the lemmings see it as a means to an end,the destruction of American economics.

[fatboy]

I just had to grab this one, since it is so completely ludicrous and worthy of all possible derision:
NOWHERE in the "universal gas laws" is there even a mention of carbon dioxide. In fact, I do believe that, by definition, a "universal gas law" that talked about a specific gas would no longer be universal. And these people, term used very loosely, claim to be our intellectual superiors.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gas_laws

The various gas laws are used to determine the various influence (for lack of a better term) of a gas or gases in a system. Suppose you know temperature and pressure but need to determine volume. Or maybe you know temperature, pressure and concentration at sea level but want to know temperature at 40,000 feet.

A problem is that there are literally hundreds maybe thousands of gases in the atmosphere, all have different properties. Even if you could determine by using a gas law or laws that there is an increase in temperature (of the gas), that still wouldn't prove global warming. It would only prove an increase in temperature in one or more of the gases. As one gas increases in temperature, another if it reacts, might decrease (exothermic vs. endothermic reactions in dynamic equilibrium).

The whole arguement always ends with the primitives calling the rest of us anti-science or thumpers. It is so childish. Where I live, right up the road from me a this dude who is president of the county democrat club . My wife gave him some chickens a few year ago and when he picked the up (free mind you) he took the opportunity to mock conservatives. My wife (a public school teacher) basically ripped the meat right off his bones. Fun to watch, but I digress.

The reason I'm mentioning him is because a company wants to put a natural gas pipeline through the county and every proposed route I've seen has the line going right smack through his old historic family "farmstead". If the pipeline gets built, it goes through his yard or the pipeline grows an extra 5 miles to get around a mountain and a lake. He is either going to accept an offer or take whatever emminent domain cooks up but what fun!

Emminent Domain gave him basically waterfront property in the 1970s and now it's likely going to put a pipeline in his back yard. I would feel bad for him if he wasn't such a prick. Karma baby!

[jukin]

If you look through the NASA report that only has 38% confidence level of NASA scientists, you will see that the the .03C rise has a +/-.09C accuracy.

I leave it to the smartest people on the interwebs to figure that out.

[HawkHogan]

All the global warming bull shit is based on a movie that made Al Gore rich.
Al Gore used footage from "A Day After Tomorrow" to support his claims. 

http://newsbusters.org/blogs/noel-sheppard/2008/04/22/abc-s-20-20-gore-used-fictional-film-clip-inconvenient-truth

[obumazombie]

If you look through the NASA report that only has 38% confidence level of NASA scientists, you will see that the the .03C rise has a +/-.09C accuracy.

I leave it to the smartest people on the interwebs to figure that out.

That did not prevent the owebumaManiaMedia from proclaiming 2014 was the hottest as if it was gospel...

http://newsbusters.org/blogs/pj-gladnick/2015/01/18/nasa-scientists-admit-only-38-chance-2014-was-hottest-year-record

One problem though. The lame stream never retracted their claims that are now shown to have only a 38% chance of being true.

[docstew]

If you look through the NASA report that only has 38% confidence level of NASA scientists, you will see that the the .03C rise has a +/-.09C accuracy.

I leave it to the smartest people on the interwebs to figure that out.

I don't think they can add that well, seeing as they keep saying 1+1=potato. I'll break it down for them: NASA doesn't believe its own report, but in that report they estimate that the temperature will either rise by up to .12 degree C (about .25 degree F, for you DUmmies who can't do math) or will FALL by up to .06 degree C. IOW, their margin of error is bigger than the expected change, meaning that they don't know what the **** is going on.