The Conservative Cave
Current Events => Politics => Topic started by: obumazombie on December 14, 2014, 07:49:53 AM
-
Paulbots like to think that Ron's son is an ever better version...
http://newsbusters.org/blogs/ann-coulter/2014/12/04/black-people-media-hate-and-rand-paul-isnt-wild-about (http://newsbusters.org/blogs/ann-coulter/2014/12/04/black-people-media-hate-and-rand-paul-isnt-wild-about)
But sometimes nutty is hard to escape from, and liberalism can set in.
-
Rand Paul is just another career politician wannabe who panders to whatever audience is in front of him. No more, no less.
-
Rand Paul is just another career politician wannabe who panders to whatever audience is in front of him. No more, no less.
A good conservative would know that no amount of pandering to the hard lib base will get one vote from them.
-
A good conservative would know that no amount of pandering to the hard lib base will get one vote from them.
No argument from me. I have problems with Rand Paul going back to his campaign. This article summarizes the BS that is Rand Paul:
http://www.nationaljournal.com/magazine/the-truthiness-of-rand-paul-20131017
-
I couldn't do very in depth research on National Journal.
Being as I don't believe I have heard of National Journal I did make a cursory attempt to analyze it.
It claims to be non partisan.
So do Time and Newsweek.
Over the years I have found Time and Newsweek to be consistently liberal.
But the cursory analysis I did gave me the impression that the Journal was liberal.
I naturally suspect all who claim to be moderate or non partisan because my experience has led me almost invariably to observe those groups to be liberal.
When I read the article I noticed the author was defensive about owebumacare.
I'm not a fan of Ron.
I thought Rand would be able to get out from his Dad's shadow.
But it looks like that's not going to happen.
-
I couldn't do very in depth research on National Journal.
Being as I don't believe I have heard of National Journal I did make a cursory attempt to analyze it.
It claims to be non partisan.
So do Time and Newsweek.
Over the years I have found Time and Newsweek to be consistently liberal.
But the cursory analysis I did gave me the impression that the Journal was liberal.
I naturally suspect all who claim to be moderate or non partisan because my experience has led me almost invariably to observe those groups to be liberal.
When I read the article I noticed the author was defensive about owebumacare.
I'm not a fan of Ron.
I thought Rand would be able to get out from his Dad's shadow.
But it looks like that's not going to happen.
In essence, I agree with you -- the apple doesn't fall far from the tree. Rand Paul is his father's son, and blood is thicker than media bullshit.
In short, I don't trust Rand Paul for the reasons stated in that article, and a few others. He's an opportunist, he's ambitious (it's that power thing again -- it's not enough being a surgeon and having the power over a person's vision and life in his hands), and ultimately he'll say whatever it takes to get elected.
There aren't many politicians -- especially career politicians -- that I would say I "trusted". Maybe even none. But I distrust Rand Paul more than usual.
-
Rand is not as crazy as Ron, but he's too crazy for me.
Still, if it came down to it, if it came down to a choice between him and Hitlery, I could at least hold my nose and vote for him, which I can't say about everyone who's been mentioned as a possible Republican candidate.