The Conservative Cave

Current Events => The DUmpster => Topic started by: BannedFromDU on December 04, 2014, 05:05:49 PM

Title: SoCalDem spins yet another bouncy...they can't just agree, they have to lie
Post by: BannedFromDU on December 04, 2014, 05:05:49 PM
Quote
Star Member SoCalDem (101,904 posts)


4 black teens, 1 white kid, an Escalade & 1 highway patrolman

When my son (the white kid) was a junior in high school (1996), he and 4 friends went on their merry way to a Laker's game.. They had only gone about 30 minutes down the road when the driver saw the lights & heard the "whoop". How do you know this detail if you weren't there? 18 years later? Um, because you made it up.

The trooper approached the car, gun drawn,Bullshit and asked the driver for his drivers' license & registration. He made him turn on the overhead light , and asked if there was a gun in the glove box. Of course there was no gun, but the officer took offense at the "tone" when the driver answered him.Again, you remember this detail despite this being 18 years ago and you not being there. Right.

He then told the others to get out of the car and put their hands on the vehicle. By this time, another trooper had shown up, and as my son started to exit the car, he was told to stay in the car. Being 17, and seeing his friends getting hassled, he mouthed off, and was told that he could wait in the Escalade or in the back seat of the cop car..So let me get this straight: a LEO thought enough of this traffic stop to have his GUN DRAWN when he approached the car (and approached the car in the first place! Anyone thinking they needed their gun wouldn't have approached the car!), and was suspicious that there was a gun in the glove box, BUT ONE OF THE CAR'S OCCUPANTS WAS ORDERED TO STAY INSIDE? BULLSHIT.

The cops asked them to empty their pockets, and the driver was questioned about why his name was not the same as on the registration.. It was his Dad & Mom's car (same last name)..
Oh, brother.

These kids were basically detained briefly for "driving erratically" (but mostly for DWB)
Basically? You remember minute detail, but not what they were detained for and for how long?

My son was pissed because if he stood up for his football teammates, he was likely to be put in a cop car and then what?..and it killed him to see them being rousted for nothing.
Sounds like a real Freedom Rider.

The second cop to arrive, left, and the original one told them to drive carefully, and did not ticket them..

The general consensus was that 4 black teens in a new Escalade, had to mean that they stole it..The other general consensus is that you're a lying sack of shit.


http://www.democraticunderground.com/10025910242





ZERO BONGS.
Title: Re: SoCalDem spins yet another bouncy...they can't just agree, they have to lie
Post by: Zathras on December 04, 2014, 05:38:18 PM
Wow, those black kids were really lucky to have a brand new Cadilac Escalade in 1996. Especially when the first models didn't go on sale till the 1999 model year.
Title: Re: SoCalDem spins yet another bouncy...they can't just agree, they have to lie
Post by: BannedFromDU on December 04, 2014, 05:44:36 PM
Wow, those black kids were really lucky to have a brand new Cadilac Escalade in 1996. Especially when the first models didn't go on sale till the 1999 model year.


I thought of that too. Stories like this that get sopped up like gravy on DU yet cannot possibly be true really give me pause. Last night I saw that "hands up don't shoot" is now the thing around the entire world, despite it having no basis in fact. Liberals just make shit up, repeat it, and insist it's true based on repetition alone.

I'm starting to think a bunch of things are just liberal bullshit. Rosa Parks probably could have sat wherever she wanted. MLK probably died on the toilet, watching F Troop. So on, so forth.
Title: Re: SoCalDem spins yet another bouncy...they can't just agree, they have to lie
Post by: HawkHogan on December 04, 2014, 06:02:16 PM
Wow, those black kids were really lucky to have a brand new Cadilac Escalade in 1996. Especially when the first models didn't go on sale till the 1999 model year.

Exactly the first thing I thought about when I read this bouncy.  I don't remember any Escalades on the road before 2000.
Title: Re: SoCalDem spins yet another bouncy...they can't just agree, they have to lie
Post by: CC27 on December 04, 2014, 06:06:42 PM
Exactly the first thing I thought about when I read this bouncy.  I don't remember any Escalades on the road before 2000.

Anyone got a sock they want to burn and tell that bitch no Escalades in 1996?  :fuelfire:
Title: Re: SoCalDem spins yet another bouncy...they can't just agree, they have to lie
Post by: Ralph Wiggum on December 04, 2014, 08:24:19 PM
Anyone got a sock they want to burn and tell that bitch no Escalades in 1996?  :fuelfire:

That would be a thing of beauty.
Title: Re: SoCalDem spins yet another bouncy...they can't just agree, they have to lie
Post by: Carl on December 04, 2014, 08:40:09 PM
Quote
Response to ChisolmTrailDem (Reply #18)

Thu Dec 4, 2014, 06:16 PM

 SoCalDem (101,912 posts)
21. Mea culpa.. I thought he told me it was an escalade

It was a luxury model SUV..obviously not a Caddy.. so sorry.. It must have been a Lincoln Navigator..

We drive older used cars, so I am not very car-conscious

Quote
Response to SoCalDem (Reply #21)

Thu Dec 4, 2014, 06:26 PM

 ChisolmTrailDem (5,073 posts)
22. Good enough for me. I don't know much about cars either and often if I speaking with

someone and I don't know the model of some relevant vehicle, I'll offer something that is similar to the one I'm referring to or say it was an SUV, or two-door sports car, or pickup truck, for example.

My ability to ramble off car models off the top of my head (and even if I'm looking right at one) stops at about 1982, lol.

Quote
Response to ChisolmTrailDem (Reply #22)

Thu Dec 4, 2014, 06:30 PM

 SoCalDem (101,912 posts)
23. I remembered that it went by a single name and jumped to a wrong conclusion

and of course the nearly a decade in-between the event and now may not have helped either


2014-1996 =less then 10 years.

 :lmao:
Title: Re: SoCalDem spins yet another bouncy...they can't just agree, they have to lie
Post by: DLR Pyro on December 04, 2014, 08:50:41 PM

2014-1996 =less then 10 years.

 :lmao:

common core math
Title: Re: SoCalDem spins yet another bouncy...they can't just agree, they have to lie
Post by: CC27 on December 04, 2014, 09:29:32 PM
She drives older cars but her son has a new SUV? I don't Lincoln made that model in 1996.
Title: Re: SoCalDem spins yet another bouncy...they can't just agree, they have to lie
Post by: diesel driver on December 04, 2014, 09:31:12 PM
Problem #2:  The first Lincoln Navigator wasn't built until 1998.   :rotf:

Keep trying, DUmbass SoCalDUmb!   :lol:
Title: Re: SoCalDem spins yet another bouncy...they can't just agree, they have to lie
Post by: DLR Pyro on December 04, 2014, 09:55:51 PM
Problem #2:  The first Lincoln Navigator wasn't built until 1998.   :rotf:

Keep trying, DUmbass SoCalDUmb!   :lol:
did I saw Lincoln navigator?   

Mea culpa. I meant a Chevrolet  suburban.
Title: Re: SoCalDem spins yet another bouncy...they can't just agree, they have to lie
Post by: CC27 on December 04, 2014, 10:00:54 PM
did I saw Lincoln navigator?   

Mea culpa. I meant a Chevrolet  suburban.


This never happened. She saw it on an episode of law and order in 1996.
Title: Re: SoCalDem spins yet another bouncy...they can't just agree, they have to lie
Post by: diesel driver on December 04, 2014, 10:10:15 PM
did I saw Lincoln navigator?   

Mea culpa. I meant a Chevrolet  suburban.
.  :lol:

Mea culpa.  Is that like DUmmie speak for "Hey, I'm an F'N IDIOT!"
Title: Re: SoCalDem spins yet another bouncy...they can't just agree, they have to lie
Post by: HawkHogan on December 04, 2014, 10:12:02 PM
Next it will change the OJ's White Bronco
Title: Re: SoCalDem spins yet another bouncy...they can't just agree, they have to lie
Post by: Dori on December 04, 2014, 10:58:08 PM
Next it will change the OJ's White Bronco

That's what I was going to say.... :rofl:



Title: Re: SoCalDem spins yet another bouncy...they can't just agree, they have to lie
Post by: obumazombie on December 04, 2014, 11:30:30 PM
She tawt
She taw
A puddy
atat.
Title: Re: SoCalDem spins yet another bouncy...they can't just agree, they have to lie
Post by: GOBUCKS on December 04, 2014, 11:32:42 PM
Oh, and those four black kids were actually white.

Oh, and they didn't actually get stopped by the police.

But there was a Lakers game that night.

Oh, but they couldn't get tickets.

The rest of the story is true.
Title: Re: SoCalDem spins yet another bouncy...they can't just agree, they have to lie
Post by: dutch508 on December 05, 2014, 01:32:14 AM
The Escalade was introduced for the 1999 model year in response to German and Japanese competitors and to Ford's 1998 release of the Lincoln Navigator.

The DUmp monkey remembers tiny details to the story from 'over a decade ago' but not the right car...

 ::)

Title: Re: SoCalDem spins yet another bouncy...they can't just agree, they have to lie
Post by: RobJohnson on December 05, 2014, 01:42:49 AM
Wow, those black kids were really lucky to have a brand new Cadilac Escalade in 1996. Especially when the first models didn't go on sale till the 1999 model year.

You beat me to it. They must of stole the prototype! LOL
Title: Re: SoCalDem spins yet another bouncy...they can't just agree, they have to lie
Post by: RobJohnson on December 05, 2014, 01:44:42 AM
Next it will change the OJ's White Bronco

 :lol: :lol: :lol:
Title: Re: SoCalDem spins yet another bouncy...they can't just agree, they have to lie
Post by: obumazombie on December 05, 2014, 03:53:01 AM
The Escalade was introduced for the 1999 model year in response to German and Japanese competitors and to Ford's 1998 release of the Lincoln Navigator.

The DUmp monkey remembers tiny details to the story from 'over a decade ago' but not the right car...

 ::)

They can't even get that part of the bouncy straight(the decade of the escalade).