The Conservative Cave

Current Events => The DUmpster => Topic started by: BannedFromDU on October 24, 2014, 04:44:40 PM

Title: Butthurt evidently not covered by 0losercare
Post by: BannedFromDU on October 24, 2014, 04:44:40 PM
Quote
Reter (420 posts)

Health care should be completely free or no more than $20 a month for incomes under 50k/year

Who agrees with me? The rich should just pay more. It is not fair that I have to pay $307 a month for basic bronze healthcare, which is more than a basic car payment. I can't afford my bills anymore. I used to hate people who go off the books to get free benefits, but now I understand why they do it.

I regret signing up. I should have just taken the fine. Sorry to sound like I'm wining, but with rent and everything it hurts.



http://www.democraticunderground.com/10025709828


Oh, no, DUmmy. You get to :ownit: .

And...

Quote
Reter (420 posts)

4. Maybe I'm delusional, but I thought we were getting free health care in 1993/1994 No, you mean someone else was going to pay your way.

It never passed, so I didn't think about it again until ACA. When that was signed into law, I never dreamed I'd have to pay more than a few dollars a week, and thought it would automatically come out of my check.


DUmbass, I give you:

[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hV-05TLiiLU[/youtube]


And once again, :ownit:
Title: Re: Butthurt evidently not covered by 0losercare
Post by: obumazombie on October 24, 2014, 04:48:37 PM
And yet they don't hold owebuma responsible. Let them stew in their misery.
Title: Re: Butthurt evidently not covered by 0losercare
Post by: Big Dog on October 24, 2014, 04:49:46 PM
DUmmy tears are like nectar, so yummy and sweet.
Title: Re: Butthurt evidently not covered by 0losercare
Post by: miskie on October 25, 2014, 11:50:36 AM
lol.

Quote from: Star Member samsingh (12,017 posts) Fri Oct 24, 2014, 06:07 PM

14. did you write to the repugs in congress who scuttled the whole thing with their fear based ads?

Sorry, DUmbass. There is no way that one can pin any of Obamacare on the 'repugs'.  They were locked out of its creation, and none of them voted for it. This is all on you.

Title: Re: Butthurt evidently not covered by 0losercare
Post by: El Jefe on October 25, 2014, 12:12:33 PM
DUmmy tears are like nectar, so yummy and sweet.

 :rofl: :popcorn:
Title: Re: Butthurt evidently not covered by 0losercare
Post by: BattleHymn on October 25, 2014, 12:50:23 PM
$307 a month? 

That is more expensive than my current insurance, but it's also cheaper than a lot of plans out there.  Then again, my insurance has a realistic deductible. 


:ownit:
Title: Re: Butthurt evidently not covered by 0losercare
Post by: Karin on October 25, 2014, 02:02:34 PM
Quote

Response to Reter (Original post)

Fri Oct 24, 2014, 11:25 PM

 meow2u3 (15,515 posts)

24. K&R for fairness

I strongly agree that health care should cost no more than $20/mo. if you make $50K/yr or less. It should be on a sliding scale, including mental health care.
 

Of course, gotta have that. 
Title: Re: Butthurt evidently not covered by 0losercare
Post by: BannedFromDU on October 25, 2014, 02:09:09 PM
Of course, gotta have that.

     Just wait til after the election (of course) when the new 0losercare rates come out. It's one thing for King 0****lenuts to hold off until after the election debacle to post the increases, but DUmmies are still going to have to actually pay them, including the increases in deductibles. And so begins the death spiral of 0losercare, which will, Allah willing, bankrupt a lot of liberals along the way. And the death spiral will be in full effect right around, oh, 2016, when a GOP-controlled Congress can prevent Lord Zero from delaying bad news.
   
     You pricks better enjoy the extremely meager benefits of suppressing bad information before this election, because it will be in your face like a bad news bukkake in 2016.
Title: Re: Butthurt evidently not covered by 0losercare
Post by: obumazombie on October 26, 2014, 11:23:23 AM
Even though it's almost impossible to believe that there are those out there defending the steaming pile, they still are.
Title: Re: Butthurt evidently not covered by 0losercare
Post by: lastparker on October 28, 2014, 01:29:28 PM
Of course there are the obligatory accusations of "Troll!", but when you look more closely, you REALLY get a picture of their parasitic mentality:

Quote
nomorenomore08 (11,586 posts)
9. Paying a little more in taxes is not "class warfare."

No one wants to take all your money away, but those who've disproportionately benefited from society should disproportionately contribute to it.

No asshole, most wealthy people have benefited from their own hard work.

Quote
SheilaT (16,084 posts)
6. Basic health care needs to be completely free.
<snip to remove endless blather.....>
Companies that research new drugs or devise new kinds of surgeries need to be able to benefit from that. But how much? Maybe all such companies should be in effect public utilities, allowed to make a limited but reasonable profit. It's an idea, anyway.

Great idea! See how eager the drug companies are to cure the next sexually transmitted disease that you DUmmies germinate when their profits are throttled by the government, while the endless regulations on testing expand with every baseless lawsuit.

Quote
onethatcares (7,657 posts)
7. another aspect of an answer

medical school should be free for those that graduate but upon graduation those folks should spend the same period of time working for the U.S. government providing healthcare to the citizens. When they finish their stretch they are home free. Of course while treating citizens they should receive a good income

For specialty areas there would be an increase in the amount of time serving the country.

it's a win/win. Jobs for the grads, no large medical school bills and healthcare for all of us at a reasonable rate.
Quote
Prophet 451 (8,948 posts)
15. Excellent idea

Medical training is, IIRC, about six years. So they do their training and then spend six years working for the USHS (for lack of a better name) and, at the end of that, their tuition fee loans get written off. While they're working for the USHS, they receive a decent upper-middle income. Not the lap of luxury but enough for a nice upper-mid life. New car every five years or so, couple of weeks holiday a year, that sort of life. That's how doctors here (UK) are paid.

Just wait until it comes time to define terms like "upper-middle income" and "new car"....

 :hammer:
Title: Re: Butthurt evidently not covered by 0losercare
Post by: Texacon on October 28, 2014, 01:54:06 PM
All I have to say is ... DUmmie must have one hell of a cell phone bill!!

Quote
While extolling the benefits of Obamacare less than 10 days before the opening of the new health insurance marketplaces, the president said that "you can offer your family the security of health care ... for less than your cell phone bill."

http://www.weeklystandard.com/blogs/obama-obamacare-offers-health-insurance-less-your-cell-phone-bill_756593.html

September the 23rd, 2013

My how things have changed since, huh?  Was that the Republicans lying to you?  Nope, that's your man.
KC
Title: Re: Butthurt evidently not covered by 0losercare
Post by: BlueStateSaint on October 28, 2014, 02:04:43 PM
All I have to say is ... DUmmie must have one hell of a cell phone bill!!

http://www.weeklystandard.com/blogs/obama-obamacare-offers-health-insurance-less-your-cell-phone-bill_756593.html

September the 23rd, 2013

My how things have changed since, huh?  Was that the Republicans lying to you?  Nope, that's your man.
KC

Dead on . . .

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BUSRZo1BE5o[/youtube]

Hey, Dems . . .

:ownit:
Title: Re: Butthurt evidently not covered by 0losercare
Post by: freedumb2003b on October 28, 2014, 02:33:00 PM
Dead on . . .

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BUSRZo1BE5o[/youtube]

Hey, Dems . . .

:ownit:

Wow -- it looks like obozo's support went down .0001%

But these guys get it.
Title: Re: Butthurt evidently not covered by 0losercare
Post by: obumazombie on October 28, 2014, 02:37:12 PM
At least a few left the reservation after first owning it.
Title: Re: Butthurt evidently not covered by 0losercare
Post by: BannedFromDU on October 28, 2014, 02:39:35 PM
Wow -- it looks like obozo's support went down .0001%

Don't worry. Someone's dead relatives will vote Dem in the next several elections to offset the loss.
Title: Re: Butthurt evidently not covered by 0losercare
Post by: Gina on October 28, 2014, 02:54:50 PM
Quote
Reter (420 posts)

Health care should be completely free or no more than $20 a month for incomes under 50k/year

Who agrees with me? The rich should just pay more. It is not fair that I have to pay $307 a month for basic bronze healthcare, which is more than a basic car payment. I can't afford my bills anymore. I used to hate people who go off the books to get free benefits, but now I understand why they do it.

I regret signing up. I should have just taken the fine. Sorry to sound like I'm wining, but with rent and everything it hurts.

WOW, just WOW.  I can't believe someone would actually type that out. 
Title: Re: Butthurt evidently not covered by 0losercare
Post by: Gina on October 28, 2014, 03:09:38 PM
Dead on . . .

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BUSRZo1BE5o[/youtube]

Hey, Dems . . .

:ownit:

THIS is awesome.  It needs to go viral EVERYWHERE.
Title: Re: Butthurt evidently not covered by 0losercare
Post by: DLR Pyro on October 28, 2014, 03:13:31 PM
Quote
I regret signing up. I should have just taken the fine. Sorry to sound like I'm wining, but with rent and everything it hurts.

First off, you don't sound like you are wining, you sound like you are whining.

Next, if rent is such a hardship, who don't you and  20 losers in the same position as you are move into a commune and live in bliss and harmony.  It worked out so well for the hippies in the '60's so why not revive the tradition.  And you can thank your beloved messiah,  barrack hussein obama for bringing all of you people together so you can all equally live in misery and squalor.
Title: Re: Butthurt evidently not covered by 0losercare
Post by: lastparker on October 28, 2014, 07:23:14 PM
Wow -- it looks like obozo's support went down .0001%

But these guys get it.

You reminded me of this gem....

[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nI0ib11evdU[/youtube]
Title: Re: Butthurt evidently not covered by 0losercare
Post by: Ptarmigan on October 28, 2014, 11:26:32 PM
Time to stock up on butthurt cream come the Election Day. That stuff is not cheap. I also need to get cleaning supplies for exploding heads. God, I do not want to do that ghastly job of cleaning up after them.