The Conservative Cave

Current Events => The DUmpster => Topic started by: Mr Mannn on October 08, 2014, 07:05:35 AM

Title: Does VIOLENCE belong in the liberal toolkit?
Post by: Mr Mannn on October 08, 2014, 07:05:35 AM

http://www.democraticunderground.com/10025636382

Quote

reddread (2,380 posts)

Does VIOLENCE belong in the liberal toolkit?
I believe the big difference between conservative and liberal values is most simply stated as-
CONSERVATIVE = "WHAT'S IN IT FOR ME?"
LIBERAL = "WHAT'S IN IT FOR EVERYBODY?"

If people are going to die, thats simply not a liberal value.
and there really is no such thing as "neoliberal" anymore than
"libertarian". there arent that many shades between
RIGHT and WRONG.

Hmmm. Not a single reply. Wonder why?

Quote

If people are going to die, thats simply not a liberal value.

Unless you are a baby, elderly or mentally handicapped, then a liberal will kill you, or withhold medical care until you die.

Title: Re: Does VIOLENCE belong in the liberal toolkit?
Post by: DumbAss Tanker on October 08, 2014, 07:33:30 AM

Quote

If people are going to die, thats simply not a liberal value.

History demonstrates they're perfectly fine with it, even all for it, as long as it's people who disagree with them, are of no further use to them, or otherwise 'Not them.'

Title: Re: Does VIOLENCE belong in the liberal toolkit?
Post by: miskie on October 08, 2014, 07:45:47 AM

Sure...

That's why none of you at DU have this printed on something you own...

(http://bkpk.me/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/Che_Guevara_by_purposemaker.jpg)

Title: Re: Does VIOLENCE belong in the liberal toolkit?
Post by: FiddyBeowulf on October 08, 2014, 07:50:19 AM

Quote

reddread (2,380 posts)

Does VIOLENCE belong in the liberal toolkit?
I believe the big difference between conservative and liberal values is most simply stated as-
CONSERVATIVE = "WHAT'S IN IT FOR GONNA COST ME?"
LIBERAL = "WHAT'S IN IT FOR EVERYBODY THE AGGRIEVED GROUP I BELONG TO?"

Fixed.

Title: Re: Does VIOLENCE belong in the liberal toolkit?
Post by: USA4ME on October 08, 2014, 08:17:28 AM

Quote from:

reddread

LIBERAL = "WHAT'S IN IT FOR EVERYBODY?"

What evidence do you have that's the case?

Here's what I see: Your attitude kills any message you claim you're trying to get out. If you really wanted what's best for everybody (as you claim), then you wouldn't be name-calling or saying the nasty things you say about your opposition. You certainly wouldn't be telling lies about who and what they stand for (racist, homophobes, hates women, etc...) That you do those things alone is enough to tell people that you really AREN'T "what's in it for everybody." People who are in it for everybody don't behave the way you do. When you libs read what I just wrote, you take it to heart and determine not to ever be that way again. That's the beginning of convincing others that you're "in it for everybody."

I've pointed this out to libs before and WHOOSH!!.... they just don't get it.

.

Title: Re: Does VIOLENCE belong in the liberal toolkit?
Post by: Carl on October 08, 2014, 08:36:21 AM

Odd how the more they proclaim that they care about everyone the louder they wail about not getting stuff given to them.