The Conservative Cave
Current Events => The DUmpster => Topic started by: landofconfusion80 on August 20, 2014, 07:52:43 AM
-
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10025416337 (http://www.democraticunderground.com/10025416337)
n2doc (33,633 posts)
The 10 Kinds of Trolls You Will Encounter When Talking About Mike Brown
If you're paying attention to the events unfolding in Ferguson -- and by God, you better be -- then you probably already know there is a group of people in this country of ours who are determined to change the focus of the conversation about the killing of Mike Brown and the subsequent protests, attempting to shift the lens away from the Constitutional rights of U.S. citizens and the killing of a black teenager. If you're reading this, you probably already know the folks I'm talking about. But here they are. #Staywoke.
The Full-Blown Racist Troll
Block on sight. Some of them are friends of your Facebook friends -- block them. Some of them are your Facebook friends. Many of them are accounts like the one I have screenshotted below: anonymous and relying on blatantly racist language, such as blackface imagery, monkey references, use of the N-word, etc. These have exploded over the last week. We're talking hundreds. I've been using Twitter avidly for years and I can't recall ever seeing quite this much racist bile taking over an event-related hashtag (#Ferguson) as I have this week. Block them and report them for spam immediately.
The "Wait for Evidence" Troll
This troll may or may not be anonymous and pretends to be focused on respecting and upholding the law. "We don't know what happened yet," they say, "wait for evidence before you lambast an officer of the law." They pretend that things like racism, police brutality, police corruption, etc. don't exist and insist that if concrete evidence is released, they will be swayed to feel "sympathy" for Mike Brown. But they won't. When evidence arises, they find objection to its relevance or veracity. They then transform into The "Mike Brown Shouldn't Have " Troll, to follow.
The "Mike Brown Shouldn't Have " Troll
This troll (and the others as well) will go great lengths to justify the taking of black life. "He shouldn't have run," "he shouldn't have been sagging," "he shouldn't have been walking down the middle of the street," "he shouldn't have stolen something." These trolls come in all races and will insist that when a police officer (or a homeowner, or a security guard) assaults a person of color, that person must have done something to deserve it. The fact that Mike Brown was shot at least 6 times doesn't register as overkill, even when two of those shots were in the head. They will also extend effort to paint Ferguson as a ghetto, where this kind of thing happens all the time. Nope. Ferguson, Missouri had zero murders.
more
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/olivia-cole/the-10-kinds-of-trolls-yo_b_5691405.html
It's extremely important for the primitives to block out any new info at this point. It's the only way to shield from the facts that could change their narrative.
Agschmid (10,382 posts)
1. Seen most of these now...
I wonder why...
BklnDem75 (2,481 posts)
3. I'm seeing a lot of that...
Coincidence that the 'wait and see' people latch onto anything that helps this so called cop? I think not. From believing people who wasn't at the scene to believing the bum rush theory. Seriously, people have to use the imagination side of their brain to make that story work. They also completely ignore that Brown had been shot several times already before this supposed bull charge.
Pots and kettles and so forth...
delphi72 (72 posts)
4. They Left Out The...
Judge, Jury and Executioner troll. These people would take the officer out in a field and shoot him, claiming it is "just" and "right" and "proper". They are no better than those who would lynch an african american 50 years ago for looking at someone wrong.
Poor Delphi, far too young to be eating granite pizzas already.
-
BklnDem75 (2,481 posts)
3. I'm seeing a lot of that...
Coincidence that the 'wait and see' people latch onto anything that helps this so called cop? I think not. From believing people who wasn't at the scene to believing the bum rush theory. Seriously, people have to use the imagination side of their brain to make that story work. They also completely ignore that Brown had been shot several times already before this supposed bull charge.
Wait and See troll......... ? Everything not in line with leftist fantasy narrative is imagination?
Yes sir. Nothing says intelligent like a mad dash to judgement only to constantly run into the brick wall of it all falling apart.
delphi72 (72 posts)
4. They Left Out The...
Judge, Jury and Executioner troll. These people would take the officer out in a field and shoot him, claiming it is "just" and "right" and "proper". They are no better than those who would lynch an african american 50 years ago for looking at someone wrong.
You do realize you are posting on a board, full to overflowing, with these, right?
-
The "Innocent Until Proven Guilty" Troll
Everyone knows that he's guilty, guilty, GUILTY! We here in DU's so0per secw3t Star Chamber proclaimed it so! Evidence? We don't need no steekeen evidence. The cop was white. He was black. That's all the "evidence" we need. All cops are racists! Even the black ones. Now, if you'll excuse me, my car is nearly at full charge and I need to get to the registration office before all the good classes are taken up, like stink sucker, UFO welcomer, esquilax trainer, and sign spinner.
-
The "Innocent Until Proven Guilty" Troll
:hi5:
Yes, the most racist troll of all.
-
Again, I'm compelled to repeat--the primitives have cried "wolf!" so many times that it's getting harder and harder to believe them any more.
And then one of these days, a real injustice will happen, but nobody'll believe it because the primitives cried "wolf!" too many times when there wasn't a wolf.
-
You know what is funny DUmbassses?
While you mouth breathing mutants twist and writhe in idiotic lunacy and your real life counterparts are demonstrating that inner city populations are less civilized then caged animals in a zoo the sane citizenship doesn`t care or is repulsed by your vicious stupidity.
As always,the way you retarded dung beetles are reacting is exactly opposite the way sane people do.
-
Response to delphi72 (Reply #4)
Wed Aug 20, 2014, 07:51 AM
Star Member BklnDem75 (2,489 posts)
7. Do you have a link to that?
All I see are people asking for due process starting with an arrest.
Here is your link you stupid shit.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=forum&id=1002
Response to delphi72 (Reply #4)
Wed Aug 20, 2014, 07:53 AM
MohRokTah (3,553 posts)
9. .
Really?
You really just posted that?
Truth burns doesn`t it?
Response to delphi72 (Reply #4)
Wed Aug 20, 2014, 08:35 AM
Star Member Tommymac (1,274 posts)
26. Thanks for making the point.
Thanks for proving him right.
Response to delphi72 (Reply #4)
Wed Aug 20, 2014, 08:59 AM
bvf (173 posts)
39. Haven't seen that.
Where? Links?
Stupidity like that should cause you to burst on fire.
Response to delphi72 (Reply #4)
Wed Aug 20, 2014, 09:26 AM
Fantastic Anarchist (4,885 posts)
56. You're an example of the list in the OP.
No one is calling for the officer to be shot, and you know that.
Maybe not in words exactly but that sure is the sentiment.
-
Response to delphi72 (Reply #4)
Wed Aug 20, 2014, 09:26 AM
Fantastic Anarchist (4,885 posts)
56. You're an example of the list in the OP.
No one is calling for the officer to be shot, and you know that.
Maybe not in words exactly but that sure is the sentiment.
Actually, the sentiment I'm sensing from the DUmp mob is for something a little less immediate and final than shooting Darren Wilson. Hanging, drawing and quartering, perhaps. Flaying alive springs to mind. Maybe toss in a little tarring and feathering as an appetizer.
Regardless, mobs rarely want their entertainment to end so quickly. :popcorn:
-
Even the governor stated he wanted a “Vigorous Prosecution†of the police officer. So now you have a democRAT governor playing to the thug masses without looking or waiting for any of the evidence. :banghead:
-
There may be many kinds of "trolls", but apparently there is only one kind of true DUmmy. That's the kind who, in any altercation between a black and white, is always 100% certain that the white was at fault, evidence be damned.
They honed their ability to ignore evidence and jump to conclusions to a fine art in the Zimmerman case. Right now, Al Sharpton could produce a video showing the officer on the ground being beaten with a baseball bat before shooting and they'd still ignore it.
And we're supposed to be the narrow-minded ones.
:mental:
-
Even the governor stated he wanted a “Vigorous Prosecution†of the police officer. So now you have a democRAT governor playing to the thug masses without looking or waiting for any of the evidence. :banghead:
Just a little bit of defense for Jay Nixon. Wanting a vigorous prosecution does not have to imply belief in guilt. It does imply wanting to try and determine the facts to determine guilt or innocence.
George Zimmerman was vigorously prosecuted, but he was found not guilty.
-
Just a little bit of defense for Jay Nixon. Wanting a vigorous prosecution does not have to imply belief in guilt. It does imply wanting to try and determine the facts to determine guilt or innocence.
George Zimmerman was vigorously prosecuted, but he was found not guilty.
Fair enough if there is evidence of a crime (even then it does by tone presume guilt) but if there is none then to prosecute him simply to pacify a bunch of savage throwbacks is a horrible precedent.
-
(http://media.tumblr.com/tumblr_m6ijavCq2G1rr438g.gif)
THE NARRATIVE!! I MUST HAVES ITS I MUST!
-
Fair enough if there is evidence of a crime (even then it does by tone presume guilt) but if there is none then to prosecute him simply to pacify a bunch of savage throwbacks is a horrible precedent.
True, but there does have to be an investigation and probably has to be a grand jury for the fact finding.
-
Fair enough if there is evidence of a crime (even then it does by tone presume guilt) but if there is none then to prosecute him simply to pacify a bunch of savage throwbacks is a horrible precedent.
Ah, the LA/Rodney King model.
-
Just a little bit of defense for Jay Nixon. Wanting a vigorous prosecution does not have to imply belief in guilt. It does imply wanting to try and determine the facts to determine guilt or innocence.
George Zimmerman was vigorously prosecuted, but he was found not guilty.
It was an extremely poor choice of words for a governor to use, especially for one who is a lawyer himself, since it naturally implies the assumption of guilt. Up until today I regarded him as at least tolerable as DemonRats go, but in one speech he's changed my mind and convinced me he really is an idiot.
-
Just a little bit of defense for Jay Nixon. Wanting a vigorous prosecution does not have to imply belief in guilt. It does imply wanting to try and determine the facts to determine guilt or innocence.
George Zimmerman was vigorously prosecuted, but he was found not guilty.
He knew the words he was using, and he knew what it would implied. If he was truly looking for justice (either way) he would have stated that they had to wait on all the facts to come in.
-
Calling for a vigorous prosecution makes a lot of assumptions before all the facts are in and the investigation is completed.
He's signaling the DA to vigorously prosecute the cop, and he's signaling the Grand Jury that he wants the cop indicted.
He's afraid of the rioters and has political ambitions, like being Hillary's running mate.
-
The 10 Kinds of Trolls You Will Encounter When Talking About Mike Brown
This is the type of stuff that confirms that libs have no argument to make. They trot these bloggers and writers, who get something printed in PuffingtonHost and other such sites, and treat them as though what they have to say is the undisputed gospel. This article is nothing more than "I'm going to label everyone a troll and a racist who doesn't follow the template of innocent gentle giant minding his own business, racist cop, dead black kid." That someone would post this and then others would treat it as if it held any meaning shows the depths of their inability to form a cohesive argument. And liberals do this on virtually every topic, and then point at it and say "See! See!" as if it means squat.
Dear Leader's whole administration is built around this tactic. It works to some degree in the USA because the left, it seems, thinks everyone is gullible. And way too many people are; mainly the left. But you notice when it comes to foreign policy that their "appeal to authority" tactics don't work so well, and more often than not, they don't work at all.
.