The Conservative Cave

Current Events => The DUmpster => Topic started by: franksolich on August 19, 2014, 05:04:52 PM

Title: primitives discuss HUGE inconsistency, VAST HOLE
Post by: franksolich on August 19, 2014, 05:04:52 PM
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10025413082

Oh my.

Ho-hum, the primitives are still obsessed with it.

One hopes another shiny toy pops up to distract them, and entertain us; this story's stale.

Quote
MohRokTah (3,527 posts)   Tue Aug 19, 2014, 04:43 PM

I found a HUGE inconsistency in the cop narrative. VAST HOLE!

Okay, so the cops friend hears from the cop that the cop and Mr. Brown are struggling for the gun while the cop is still in the vehicle.
 
The gun then "goes off".

Guns don't just "go off". Somebody's hand is on the pistol when it "goes off".

Why did the autopsy show absolutely no gunpowder residue on Mike Brown's hands or body if he was struggling with the cop over the gun and the gun "goes off"?
 
Remember, Mr. Brown was wearing a short sleeve T-shirt at the time. If he was struggling with the cop for that gun and it "goes off", there would be gunshot residue on his hand and arm.

Quote
Rex (45,523 posts)    Tue Aug 19, 2014, 04:46 PM

1. Is the friend in the truck or is this second hand information from the friend?

Citizen patrol ride?

Quote
MohRokTah (3,527 posts)    Tue Aug 19, 2014, 04:49 PM

2. There was nobody in the car.

This is the friend who gave the third hand account to Dana Loesch's wingnut radio show.
 
This is the narrative the PD, the Prosecutor, and Wilson are running with and it's what will be presented to the grand jury.

Quote
JI7 (47,825 posts)    Tue Aug 19, 2014, 04:52 PM

7. "friend who gave the third hand account to Dana Loesch's wingnut radio show"

and this is the shit that CNN is spewing ?

Quote
dballance (5,236 posts)    Tue Aug 19, 2014, 04:51 PM

6. Second hand info.

Aka "hearsay," not good enough for court but good enough for TV Ratings and clicks.

Quote
NYC_SKP (60,243 posts)    Tue Aug 19, 2014, 04:49 PM

3. Respectfully, before others follow this pattern, I don't think you would survive a jury selection.

You know nothing, I know nothing, about the clothing or the wounds, etc.

Please read, and then re-read, Dr. Baden's report and conclusions.

Then, maybe, delete your OP, or revise it.

Quote
MohRokTah (3,527 posts)    Tue Aug 19, 2014, 04:50 PM

4. Balden specifically stated there is no gunpowder residue on Brwon. NONE.

I refuse to delete this. This is a huge hole in the BS cop story.

You, however, are free to use the trash thread or ignore functionality at your personal discretion.

^^^Uh oh.  A lowly lumpenunterprimitiven, one of the faceless lynch mob, mouthing off to Skippy, a PoP (primitive of prominence).

<<<doesn't like it when a lesser primitive argues with a greater primitive.

Quote
cwydro (13,452 posts)    Tue Aug 19, 2014, 04:50 PM

5. Good luck with logic here.

But I'm glad to read your post.
Title: Re: primitives discuss HUGE inconsistency, VAST HOLE
Post by: ChuckJ on August 19, 2014, 06:20:23 PM
Christine Byers: Crime reporter for the St. Louis Post-Dispatch.

Police sources tell me more than a dozen witnesses have corroborated cop's version of events in shooting

https://twitter.com/ChristineDByers/statuses/501556693382094848


The narrative that the DUmp longs for seems to have shakier legs each day.
Title: Re: primitives discuss HUGE inconsistency, VAST HOLE
Post by: thundley4 on August 19, 2014, 06:40:30 PM
Quote
NYC_SKP (60,243 posts)    Tue Aug 19, 2014, 04:49 PM

3. Respectfully, before others follow this pattern, I don't think you would survive a jury selection.

You know nothing, I know nothing, about the clothing or the wounds, etc.

Quite the contrary you idiot.  They would prefer to have juries that don't "know the facts" before the trial.  That is why so many lawyers try to get a change of venue in high profile cases.

The so-called facts known before a trial are often prejudicial to one side or the other.
Title: Re: primitives discuss HUGE inconsistency, VAST HOLE
Post by: franksolich on August 19, 2014, 07:00:54 PM
The narrative that the DUmp longs for seems to have shakier legs each day.

You know, the primitives have cried "wolf!" so many times that some day there's going to be a real instance of injustice, but nobody's going to pay attention because the primitives have overdone it to where no one'll believe it, even if it's true.

The primitives got to learn to restrain themselves before hollering "wolf!"
Title: Re: primitives discuss HUGE inconsistency, VAST HOLE
Post by: JohnnyReb on August 19, 2014, 07:11:11 PM
You know, the primitives have cried "wolf!" so many times that some day there's going to be a real instance of injustice, but nobody's going to pay attention because the primitives have overdone it to where no one'll believe it, even if it's true.

The primitives got to learn to restrain themselves before hollering "wolf!"
Just what Obama and crowd would love to have happen, then they could do no wrong.
Title: Re: primitives discuss HUGE inconsistency, VAST HOLE
Post by: J P Sousa on August 19, 2014, 07:21:18 PM
Certain things run through my mind when I see a thread topic.

This thread "primitives discuss HUGE inconsistency, VAST HOLE " lead me to believe it was about one of the DU's females.  :shrug:

.
Title: Re: primitives discuss HUGE inconsistency, VAST HOLE
Post by: Fourwinds on August 19, 2014, 07:59:27 PM
Funny how they treat the story of Michael Brown as the gospel. No holes there at all right libs?
Title: Re: primitives discuss HUGE inconsistency, VAST HOLE
Post by: Delmar on August 19, 2014, 08:01:48 PM
Some enterprising DUmmy needs to build a Gentle Giant model out of chicken wire and cinder blocks and perform ballistic tests on it.  Nail the cop's ass to the wall.
Title: Re: primitives discuss HUGE inconsistency, VAST HOLE
Post by: landofconfusion80 on August 19, 2014, 08:53:38 PM
Certain things run through my mind when I see a thread topic.

This thread "primitives discuss HUGE inconsistency, VAST HOLE " lead me to believe it was about one of the DU's females.  :shrug:

.
In all fairness... it could apply to a good percentage of their "males" too
Title: Re: primitives discuss HUGE inconsistency, VAST HOLE
Post by: Vagabond on August 19, 2014, 09:15:12 PM
If the officer has an injury consistent with what has been reported, isn't it more likely that Saint Micheal of Hands-in-the-air sucker punched the LEO through the window tried to run and the LEO got out and shouted to stop, then MB turned and charged.
Title: Re: primitives discuss HUGE inconsistency, VAST HOLE
Post by: USA4ME on August 19, 2014, 10:03:20 PM
Quote from:
MohRokTah

I found a HUGE inconsistency in the cop narrative. VAST HOLE!

The only VAST HOLE is between your ears, primitive.

.
Title: Re: primitives discuss HUGE inconsistency, VAST HOLE
Post by: Zathras on August 19, 2014, 11:42:58 PM
DUmbasses watch one episode of CSI and they think they're experts on the subject.
Title: Re: primitives discuss HUGE inconsistency, VAST HOLE
Post by: 98ZJUSMC on August 20, 2014, 08:14:47 AM
Quote
dballance (5,236 posts)    Tue Aug 19, 2014, 04:51 PM

6. Second hand info.

Aka "hearsay," not good enough for court but good enough for TV Ratings and clicks.

.... but more than sufficient to drive you drooling infants into fits of hysteria or believe the most ridiculous fairy tales.
Title: Re: primitives discuss HUGE inconsistency, VAST HOLE
Post by: 98ZJUSMC on August 20, 2014, 08:18:39 AM
If the officer has an injury consistent with what has been reported, isn't it more likely that Saint Micheal of Hands-in-the-air sucker punched the LEO through the window tried to run and the LEO got out and shouted to stop, then MB turned and charged.

(http://ts1.mm.bing.net/th?id=HN.607999427563291618&pid=1.7)
Title: Re: primitives discuss HUGE inconsistency, VAST HOLE
Post by: Tess Anderson on August 20, 2014, 07:10:54 PM
Funny how they treat the story of Michael Brown as the gospel. No holes there at all right libs?

Yeah, but the DUmmies don't want their narrative ruined. These are the three "witnesses" that claimed Brown was shot in the back with his hands up in the air, surrendering:

(http://ts1.mm.bing.net/th?&id=HQ.275919937561&w=330&h=300&c=0&pid=1.9&rs=0&p=0)

They lied.
Title: Re: primitives discuss HUGE inconsistency, VAST HOLE
Post by: JakeStyle on August 20, 2014, 09:23:21 PM
MohRokTah joined the DUmp the same day that the Cliven Bundy protests started in NV.  He/she/it is definitely a formerly banned DUmmy, but I'm not sure whose.
Title: Re: primitives discuss HUGE inconsistency, VAST HOLE
Post by: GOBUCKS on August 21, 2014, 08:56:31 PM
Yeah, but the DUmmies don't want their narrative ruined. These are the three "witnesses" that claimed Brown was shot in the back with his hands up in the air, surrendering:

(http://ts1.mm.bing.net/th?&id=HQ.275919937561&w=330&h=300&c=0&pid=1.9&rs=0&p=0)

They lied.

Reminder of the Zim trial.

Any bets on whether they can read cursive?