The Conservative Cave

Current Events => Politics => Topic started by: mrclose on June 25, 2014, 09:22:38 PM

Title: For Your Viewing Pleasure
Post by: mrclose on June 25, 2014, 09:22:38 PM
While I was looking around for news on Obama's approval/disapproval numbers, I ran into an interesting poll!

So many forums where the 'Rats' are still defending their Saviour ..  They can only defend Obama's low numbers by repeating the mantra ... "Bush's numbers were lower"!

While that is true (The dark skinned toned are Always going to vote favorably for the dark skinned toned Obama), the real story is in the Gallup (Yup, Gallup) poll that I discovered!

Enjoy!

(http://i61.tinypic.com/2vn06cl.jpg)

(http://i39.tinypic.com/34po1z5.jpg) (http://i39.tinypic.com/34po1z5.jpg) (http://i39.tinypic.com/34po1z5.jpg) (http://i39.tinypic.com/34po1z5.jpg)

Title: Re: For Your Viewing Pleasure
Post by: JohnnyReb on June 25, 2014, 09:30:10 PM
Obama is #1 .......in the unfavorable column.
Title: Re: For Your Viewing Pleasure
Post by: franksolich on June 25, 2014, 09:38:50 PM
Obama is #1 .......in the unfavorable column.

The Big Zero's also the only one who's "favorable" is less than his "unfavorable."
Title: Re: For Your Viewing Pleasure
Post by: Tess Anderson on June 26, 2014, 12:17:29 AM
This poll shows the greying of America - some of those polled probably weren't even alive during the Carter years.

The 47% number for Obama is disturbing, it's Romney's old number. Maybe he was right.
Title: Re: For Your Viewing Pleasure
Post by: Chris_ on June 26, 2014, 12:27:38 AM
16% had no opinion of Jimmy Carter?

I remember H.W's administration and the recession that followed... it was right when I graduated from high school and had to find work.  Not that Clinton was any better eight years later.
Title: Re: For Your Viewing Pleasure
Post by: DumbAss Tanker on June 26, 2014, 07:15:26 PM
16% had no opinion of Jimmy Carter?

I remember H.W's administration and the recession that followed... it was right when I graduated from high school and had to find work.  Not that Clinton was any better eight years later.

Democrats never tire of bragging about Clinton's economy, even though it actually ended in a short recession.  In real life, the reason the economy boomed under Clinton was the entirely-coincidental synchronicity with the internet boom, and the fact his Leftie agenda in the first two years pissed people off so much that he totally lost control of the Congress for the remaining six years and so could not get any of moonbat crap passed into law.   
Title: Re: For Your Viewing Pleasure
Post by: obumazombie on June 27, 2014, 12:13:50 AM
Democrats never tire of bragging about Clinton's economy, even though it actually ended in a short recession.  In real life, the reason the economy boomed under Clinton was the entirely-coincidental synchronicity with the internet boom, and the fact his Leftie agenda in the first two years pissed people off so much that he totally lost control of the Congress for the remaining six years and so could not get any of moonbat crap passed into law.
The internet stock market boom under Clinton took on a lot of his personality. Deceptive, no depth, no solid fundamentals, very promiscuous.
Title: Re: For Your Viewing Pleasure
Post by: Chris_ on June 27, 2014, 01:25:04 AM
Anyone who lived through the Clinton administration fondly remembers gas @ 75 cents a gallon thanks to Reagan/Bush energy and foreign policies.  People were lining up for weeks to fill up their cars.

It was the only bright spot, because trying to get through the last 18 months of Clintonomics sucked ass.