The Conservative Cave

The Bar => The Lounge => Topic started by: dane on April 08, 2014, 02:47:00 PM

Title: Very short rant on 'me thinks' and 'close proximity'.
Post by: dane on April 08, 2014, 02:47:00 PM
"Methinks", or worse, "Me thinks" is an ostentatious way to begin a sentence or a thought. 

"Just sayin'" should not be appended to the end of a sentence or a thought in an effort to make it more acceptable, or as a subtle way of avoiding the defense of that thought or sentence.

'Methinks that jacket doesn't go well with the rest of your outfit. Just sayin.'

And there is also "close proximity", and with 'proximity' meaning 'near', is there such a thing as "far proximity"?
Title: Re: Very short rant on 'me thinks' and 'close proximity'.
Post by: DLR Pyro on April 08, 2014, 03:01:33 PM
me thinks you have too much time on your hands to worry about such trivial items.   Just sayin'
Title: Re: Very short rant on 'me thinks' and 'close proximity'.
Post by: YupItsMe on April 08, 2014, 03:05:26 PM
"Methinks", or worse, "Me thinks" is an ostentatious way to begin a sentence or a thought. 

"Just sayin'" should not be appended to the end of a sentence or a thought in an effort to make it more acceptable, or as a subtle way of avoiding the defense of that thought or sentence.

'Methinks that jacket doesn't go well with the rest of your outfit. Just sayin.'

And there is also "close proximity", and with 'proximity' meaning 'near', is there such a thing as "far proximity"?

I almost always use proper grammer, just sayin' 
Title: Re: Very short rant on 'me thinks' and 'close proximity'.
Post by: Wayne on April 08, 2014, 03:07:56 PM
   I always go by the general consensus as long as it is in close proximity. Me thinks I'm just sayin' know what I mean?
Title: Re: Very short rant on 'me thinks' and 'close proximity'.
Post by: freedumb2003b on April 08, 2014, 03:20:54 PM
I am unsure why you chose such rarely used phrases.


There is a long list of words that are not modifiable: perfect, flabbergasted, worthless to name a few ("few" is modifiable).

As for "me thinks" (as two words or one), I haven't heard anyone use that term to begin, end or modify a sentence.  What do you think of "I reckon?"

And speaking of strange words which are only modified, when is the last time you have heard of someone being "gruntled," a flag or banner being "furled" (methinks there is a famous poem that uses that term from the 1800's, I reckon).  And outside of a newspaper when is you heard that someone is embattled.


Title: Re: Very short rant on 'me thinks' and 'close proximity'.
Post by: dane on April 08, 2014, 03:31:57 PM
I am unsure why you chose such rarely used phrases.


There is a long list of words that are not modifiable: perfect, flabbergasted, worthless to name a few ("few" is modifiable).

As for "me thinks" (as two words or one), I haven't heard anyone use that term to begin, end or modify a sentence.  What do you think of "I reckon?"

And speaking of strange words which are only modified, when is the last time you have heard of someone being "gruntled," a flag or banner being "furled" (methinks there is a famous poem that uses that term from the 1800's, I reckon).  And outside of a newspaper when is you heard that someone is embattled.



I ran across 'me thinks' today on CC, and because I do have time on my hands, started typing rants.

'Furled' is an old nautical term, along with port, starboard, head (bathroom on a ship or boat - the sanitary facilities on the old sailing vessels was always in the bow area (front) of the vessels due to winds blowing in that direction to propel the ship AND carry away the stench).  'Furl' is to roll up tightly and secure, and later 'unfurl the sails'.

I also enjoy the misuse of something that 'begs the question of', followed by a question.  It doesn't mean that. Just sayin'
Title: Re: Very short rant on 'me thinks' and 'close proximity'.
Post by: freedumb2003b on April 08, 2014, 03:51:06 PM
I ran across 'me thinks' today on CC, and because I do have time on my hands, started typing rants.

'Furled' is an old nautical term, along with port, starboard, head (bathroom on a ship or boat - the sanitary facilities on the old sailing vessels was always in the bow area (front) of the vessels due to winds blowing in that direction to propel the ship AND carry away the stench).  'Furl' is to roll up tightly and secure, and later 'unfurl the sails'.

I also enjoy the misuse of something that 'begs the question of', followed by a question.  It doesn't mean that. Just sayin'

That is another favorite of mine.  I always ask "how does that question answer itself?"

And let us not forget the almost complete retirement of the word "few" for countable objects ("less taxes," "less songs," "less clouds").  I have seen and heard that in news (print and broadcast), advertising, academic papers, and damn near everywhere English is used.
Title: Re: Very short rant on 'me thinks' and 'close proximity'.
Post by: thundley4 on April 08, 2014, 03:55:00 PM
"The lady doth protest too much, methinks."
Title: Re: Very short rant on 'me thinks' and 'close proximity'.
Post by: DumbAss Tanker on April 08, 2014, 05:36:19 PM
Don't really care for 'Methinks,' unless the rest of the post is in Elizabethan English, in which case I wouldn't read it anyway, it strikes me as an unnecessary affectation.  The other two idioms don't bother me, though.
Title: Re: Very short rant on 'me thinks' and 'close proximity'.
Post by: Big Dog on April 08, 2014, 07:16:47 PM
What not to say:

"Methinks those pants do make your butt look big. Just sayin'."

Which begs the question, "If I had been in close proximity when I said it, would she have been gruntled, or would she have furled me?"
Title: Re: Very short rant on 'me thinks' and 'close proximity'.
Post by: Eupher on April 08, 2014, 08:15:59 PM
Methinks I'm one of those who, whilst standing upright and smelling the London fog, tend to use "methinks."

It's one of those useless words that, curiously, I like. So methinks I'll use it.   :-)
Title: Re: Very short rant on 'me thinks' and 'close proximity'.
Post by: obumazombie on April 08, 2014, 11:41:27 PM
Irregardless.
Title: Re: Very short rant on 'me thinks' and 'close proximity'.
Post by: IassaFTots on April 09, 2014, 08:32:30 AM
Irregardless.


 :argh:

Pacifically.  Jus' Sayin'.
Title: Re: Very short rant on 'me thinks' and 'close proximity'.
Post by: DefiantSix on April 09, 2014, 09:17:49 AM

 :argh:

Pacifically.  Jus' Sayin'.

Care to guess how many times I've been accused of being a "statistic bastard"?  Methinks it's enough to drive a saint to swear. Just sayin'...
Title: Re: Very short rant on 'me thinks' and 'close proximity'.
Post by: njpines on April 09, 2014, 11:18:54 AM
intents and purposes . . . and all that, just sayin'
Title: Re: Very short rant on 'me thinks' and 'close proximity'.
Post by: Chris_ on April 09, 2014, 11:21:25 AM
"in actuality"

 :banghead:
Title: Re: Very short rant on 'me thinks' and 'close proximity'.
Post by: Happy Fun Ball on April 09, 2014, 12:30:17 PM
The word "solutions" when used in advertising
Title: Re: Very short rant on 'me thinks' and 'close proximity'.
Post by: dane on April 09, 2014, 01:57:51 PM
Methought this topic might be fun, and it has been.  Just sayin'
Title: Re: Very short rant on 'me thinks' and 'close proximity'.
Post by: njpines on April 09, 2014, 02:14:44 PM
Sports talk radio -- throwing out a prevailing opinion after which the phrase "I get that" comes. Then an opposing opinion is given.
Title: Re: Very short rant on 'me thinks' and 'close proximity'.
Post by: obumazombie on April 09, 2014, 02:26:10 PM
The word "solutions" when used in advertising


(http://ak7.picdn.net/shutterstock/videos/3650141/preview/stock-footage-solutions-d-highway-exit-sign.jpg)


Title: Re: Very short rant on 'me thinks' and 'close proximity'.
Post by: Wineslob on April 09, 2014, 02:27:32 PM
Methinks this thread is crunchy in actuality............perhaps.
Title: Re: Very short rant on 'me thinks' and 'close proximity'.
Post by: Bad Dog on April 09, 2014, 02:35:02 PM
This thread seems to be taking a turn for the worst.
Title: Re: Very short rant on 'me thinks' and 'close proximity'.
Post by: obumazombie on April 09, 2014, 02:37:36 PM
This thread seems to be taking a turn for the worst.
Put it between 2 pieces of bread, don't knock it...


(http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/7/70/Knackwurst.jpg)


Title: Re: Very short rant on 'me thinks' and 'close proximity'.
Post by: dane on April 09, 2014, 04:42:34 PM
Mesaw another one today - 'my personal opinion'.  If I express "my opinion", can it be anything other than "personal"?
Title: Re: Very short rant on 'me thinks' and 'close proximity'.
Post by: Eupher on April 10, 2014, 08:24:53 PM
Sports talk radio -- throwing out a prevailing opinion after which the phrase "I get that" comes. Then an opposing opinion is given.

It ain't just sports talk. Corporate America is full of that phrase these days. Along with "leverage." And "calibrate" -- as if to understand a point of view or idea, we need to "calibrate."  :whatever:
Title: Re: Very short rant on 'me thinks' and 'close proximity'.
Post by: IassaFTots on April 10, 2014, 09:30:57 PM
It ain't just sports talk. Corporate America is full of that phrase these days. Along with "leverage." And "calibrate" -- as if to understand a point of view or idea, we need to "calibrate."  :whatever:

If I get told one more time to drill something down, well.....I will just spit!
Title: Re: Very short rant on 'me thinks' and 'close proximity'.
Post by: dane on April 11, 2014, 04:47:21 PM
I just saw another one in an online article, "must of".  Why must people use 'should of', 'would of', etc. rather than '... have'? Using 'of' really makes no sense at all.
Title: Re: Very short rant on 'me thinks' and 'close proximity'.
Post by: obumazombie on April 12, 2014, 10:39:44 PM
I just saw another one in an online article, "must of".  Why must people use 'should of', 'would of', etc. rather than '... have'? Using 'of' really makes no sense at all.
the proper terms are...
Shoulda
Woulda
Coulda (do not think of the Hemi homonym)
Title: Re: Very short rant on 'me thinks' and 'close proximity'.
Post by: Splashdown on May 18, 2014, 03:49:54 PM
irregardless of what you think, I'm glad you're proactive in your approach. Just saying.

 :hammer:
Title: Re: Very short rant on 'me thinks' and 'close proximity'.
Post by: Thor on May 18, 2014, 05:15:41 PM
Let us not forget the use of the determiner, "an" before words that start with a vowel.  Most people, even seasoned Journalists, only use the determiner, "a" before words which start with a vowel any more.  :hammer: :hammer: :hammer:

Irregardless, my personal opinion is that these people need to be furled within a sail!! :p
Title: Re: Very short rant on 'me thinks' and 'close proximity'.
Post by: Dori on May 18, 2014, 05:29:23 PM
Has there, they're and their been covered yet?

Title: Re: Very short rant on 'me thinks' and 'close proximity'.
Post by: Thor on May 18, 2014, 05:53:48 PM
Has there, they're and their been covered yet?

Theiry're...... now it has!!  :p
Title: Re: Very short rant on 'me thinks' and 'close proximity'.
Post by: GOBUCKS on May 18, 2014, 08:11:43 PM
Add "very unique" and "most unique".

There are no degrees of unique.
Title: Re: Very short rant on 'me thinks' and 'close proximity'.
Post by: obumazombie on May 19, 2014, 10:50:36 AM
Add "very unique" and "most unique".

There are no degrees of unique.

How do you catch a unique rabbit, with a cleft palate ?
U neek up on him